Media Views
Guardian.co.uk: U.S. Media Poodles (11/19/07) by Norman Solomon
Compiling a long list of U.S. hostilities in which "after laying the big flagstones on the path to war, mainstream U.S. media outlets resolve[d] to be more independent next time," the author and Media Beat critic sees fit to quote Mark Twain's quip that "it's easy to quit smoking. I've done it hundreds of times." While "superficial self-critiques have become periodic rituals at big news organizations,"the basic and chronic failures to engage in independent journalism routinely elude serious examination, whether by the "public editor" at the New York Times or by the Washington Post's in-house media columnist, Howard Kurtz, who has long double dipped as a punch-pulling media critic on the CNN payroll. Such media institutions have no use for analyzing deep-seated patterns of war reporting. The belated and fuzzy outlines of the U.S. media's second thoughts are apt to appear long after the real-time coverage has aided and abetted Washington's war planners. So, today, with few murmurs of concern from the powerhouse U.S. media, the quality of reporting on the Iranian "threat" is scarcely more of a departure from the official White House line than what we were getting five years ago in countless stories about the menace of Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Solomon specifically names the "pivotal assumption" that "continues to hold in America's high journalistic places: If you're pro-war, you can be objective; if you're anti-war, you're biased."
FAIR does not endorse every opinion expressed or vouch for facts presented here, except by ourselves. Send link suggestions to jnaureckas@fair.org.
Email to a friend