Click here to get your FREE sticker!
3/16/10
Since Glenn Beck left Headline News for Fox, CNN executives apparently feel that their staff is short on unbalanced hatemongers. To make up the gap, they've just hired Erick Erickson as a political commentator.

Action Alert: CNN Scrapes Bottom of Right-Wing Barrel With Erickson Hire (3/16/10)
CounterSpin: Lynn Paltrow on Utah miscarriage law, Susan Linn on Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (3/12/10)
Action Alert: NYT and the ACORN Hoax : Why can't paper admit its mistakes? (3/11/10)
Extra!: Letters to the Editor (November 2009)
| Other Recent Additions

Disasters
Economy
Haiti
FROM THE ARCHIVES
Move Over—Over and Over
Media’s rightward push for Democrats (July/August 2006)
You'll be hearing a lot in this vein.
FROM THE ARCHIVES
Demonizing the Victims of Katrina
Coverage painted hurricane survivors as looters, snipers and rapists (November/December 2005)
FROM THE ARCHIVES
Not So Fast, Filibuster
Quietly changing the rules of democracy (December 2009)
How 41 votes came to be seen as a controlling interest in the Senate.
FROM THE ARCHIVES
Invisible Violence
Ignoring murder in post-coup Haiti (July/August 2006)
Some background on the role of U.N. "peacekeepers" in promoting violence in Haiti.
| Recent Posts:
- Posted by Jim Naureckas on 03/18/10 at 11:57 amWashington Post columnist Dana Milbank (3/18/10) returns from his excursion into mocking right-wingers to return to his natural role of ridiculing single-payer advocates. His target today is Rep. Dennis Kucinich. You know what's funny about him? He's short! Or, in Milbank's words, he's a "little man," a "little guy," a "diminutive figure" and--because he announced [...] Read more»
- Posted by Julie Hollar on 03/18/10 at 10:19 amBroadcasting & Cable (3/17/10) spoke with the head of PBS's flagship New York station about the recent hire of Newsweek editor Jon Meacham and former MTV and NPR host Alison Stewart for PBS's forthcoming program Need to Know, which is replacing Now and the Bill Moyers Journal:
WNET.org president Neal Shapiro did not rule out the possibility of future synergies between Newsweek and Need to Know.
"We haven't talked about anything specific," he said. "But I think all kinds of natural synergies may happen."
Shapiro said he is not concerned that Stewart and Meacham, who has been a frequent guest on Charlie Rose as well as MSNBC's Morning Joe, will bring ideological baggage to the program.
"They are both are incredibly smart. And I think, given their intellect, neither are people you can pigeonhole left or right. I think they have a history of asking probing questions on all sides."
"Given their intellect" they can't be placed on the left or the right? Yeah, smart people are all centrists, I guess. [...] Read more»
- Posted by Jim Naureckas on 03/18/10 at 9:12 amBoy, the folks at Amazon.com sure are mean--to hear the New York Times tell it.
A March 18 story by Motoko Rich and Brad Stone begins:
Amazon.com has threatened to stop directly selling the books of some publishers online unless they agree to a detailed list of concessions regarding the sale of electronic books, according to two industry executives with direct knowledge the discussions.
It's very clear who's the villain in the story, tabbed on the website as "Amazon May Impede Access to Some Publishers' Books": The story talks about how the online bookseller is "pressuring publishers" with its "hardball approach," shortly after it was "widely accused of abusing its position" with similar tactics that "shocked the publishing world." If Amazon keeps it up, "it could harm its reputation in the eyes of customers and the publishing industry" and (in the words of a source) do "serious long-term damage to their own brand."
By implication, the hero would be Apple, which is also entering the electronic book market. Apple's business model, at any rate, doesn't get the harsh spin from the Times that Amazon receives.
Which is funny, because Apple's plan would result in consumers paying from 30 percent to 50 percent more to buy most e-books, and prevent publishers from allowing anyone else to undercut Apple's inflated prices. It's a terrible deal for consumers, whom you would think make up the majority of readers even in the Times' Business section--but the piece is written with the unstated assumption that we're all rooting for the publishers.
[...] Read more» - Posted by Jim Naureckas on 03/17/10 at 3:21 pmVia Climate Progress (3/16/10), Scientific American guest blogger John Horgan (3/16/10) makes a disturbing claim:
Two sources at the Science Times section of the New York Times have told me that a majority of the section's editorial staff doubts that human-induced global warming represents a serious threat to humanity.
Now, reviews of climate research literature show universal support for the notion that human-caused climate change is happening (Nature, 12/3/04), and surveys of climate scientists find the same unanimity (Science Daily, 1/19/09). Major scientific organizations around the world have endorsed the consensus of the climate research field, and have expressed alarm at the dangers to humanity posed by climate change.
So if a majority of the staff of Science Times nonetheless doubts that human-caused climate change is a real danger, that means one of two things: Either the journalists at one of the nation's most visible sources of science news consider scientists to be a dubious lot who may well not know what they're talking about, or those journalists have not been paying attention to what the scientists are saying. Either way, it's troubling.
[...] Read more»
| More Blog posts







