<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Winslow Wheeler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/winslow-wheeler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Plane Crash Begets Military Budget &#039;Booster-Baloney&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/31/plane-crash-yields-military-budget-booster-baloney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/31/plane-crash-yields-military-budget-booster-baloney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winslow Wheeler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News reports on a March 25 F-22 crash in Mojave, Calif., that "contained some strange assertions about the cost of the F-22" have budget myth-buster Winslow Wheeler (Military.com, 3/28/09) decrying the "utter hogwash" that reporters printed "possibly based on the price asserted in the Air Force's 'fact' sheet on the F-22 that was linked to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News reports on a March 25 F-22 crash in Mojave, Calif., that "contained some strange assertions about the cost of the F-22" have budget <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=6843">myth-buster</a> Winslow Wheeler (<strong>Military.com</strong>, <a href="http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,187737,00.html" target="_blank">3/28/09</a>) decrying the "utter hogwash" that reporters printed "possibly based on the price asserted in the Air Force's '<a href="http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=199" target="_blank">fact</a>' sheet on the F-22 that was linked to a Pentagon 'news' story on the crash." Wheeler demonstrates how the uncritical <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510588,00.html" target="_blank">dissemination</a> of the assertion therein--that "the cost per aircraft was typically described in many media articles as about $140 million"--means that "the tragic event was apparently used to disseminate some booster-baloney":<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>The latest "Selected Acquisition Report" from the Defense Department is the most definitive data available on the costs for the F-22. The SAR shows a "Current Estimate" for the F-22 program in "Then-Year" dollars of $64.540 billion, which includes both R&amp;D and procurement. That $64.5 billion has bought a grand total of 184 aircraft.</p>
<p>Do the arithmetic: $64.540/184 = $350.1. Total program unit price for one F-22, what approximates the "sticker price," is $350 million per copy.</p>
<p>So, where does the bogus $143 million per copy come from? Most will recognize that as the "flyaway" cost: the amount we pay today, just for the current production costs of an F-22. (Note, however, the "flyaway" cost does not include the gas, pilot etc. needed to fly the aircraft away.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Striking at the heart of such military budget <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/07/on-the-pentagons-soaring-propaganda-budget/">propaganda</a>, Wheeler responds to credulous reporters: "OK, so the F-22 is really pricey and the Air Force and its boosters are full of baloney on the cost, but it's a great airplane, a real war winner, right? Oh, please. Consider <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/28/breaking-medias-military-budget-taboo/">the source</a>."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/31/plane-crash-yields-military-budget-booster-baloney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
