<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Everyone Could Have a Mark Halperin Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/05/everyone-could-have-a-mark-halperin-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/05/everyone-could-have-a-mark-halperin-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Halperin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza's curious take on the Mark Halperin affair:
The truth of the Halperin matter is that all reporters (or others) who go on television frequently are forever in a “there but for the grace of God go I” situation.... We know of what we speak, having found ourselves tongue-tied or worse on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Washington Post</strong>'s Chris Cillizza's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/todays_paper/Outlook/2011-07-03/B/2/22.0.4107711835_epaper.html">curious take</a> on the Mark Halperin affair:</p>
<blockquote><p>The truth of the Halperin matter is that all reporters (or others) who go on television frequently are forever in a “there but for the grace of God go I” situation.... We know of what we speak, having found ourselves tongue-tied or worse on any number of occasions while staring into a camera. And in an ill-fated 2009 video venture known as <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/05/AR2009080502394.html">“Mouthpiece Theater,”</a> The Fix had to live down an inappropriate reference to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.</p></blockquote>
<p>For those who <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/">might be unaware</a>, he's referring to the skit where he and <strong>Post</strong> colleague Dana Milbank likened Hillary Clinton to a "mad bitch." This was a scripted satirical video; the "bitch" reference came in the form of an image, which would suggest they'd thought about it well in advance. There's something utterly predictable-- and pathetic-- about reporters who react to these scandals by suggesting that if you talk into a microphone often enough you're bound to say something stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/05/everyone-could-have-a-mark-halperin-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo Discovers UK Anti-Austerity Protests</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/01/wapo-discovers-uk-anti-austerity-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/01/wapo-discovers-uk-anti-austerity-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Uncut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports today on a one day walkout by public sector workers:
The strikes are the first major uprising over the Conservative-led government’s ambitious plans to slash $128 billion in spending over the next four years.
I don't know how one defines "major uprising," but on March 26 hundreds of thousands hit the streets to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Washington Post</strong> reports <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/todays_paper/A%20Section/2011-07-01/A/6/22.0.4102271857_epaper.html">today</a> on a one day walkout by public sector workers:</p>
<blockquote><p>The strikes are the first major uprising over the Conservative-led government’s ambitious plans to slash $128 billion in spending over the next four years.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don't know how one defines "major uprising," but on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_for_the_Alternative#Hyde_Park_rally">March 26</a> hundreds of thousands hit the streets to protest the government's austerity plans.  The <strong>Post</strong> didn't find them terribly newsworthy when they happened, running a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/crowds-march-in-london-against-proposed-cuts/2011/03/27/AFtBLMgB_story.html">brief item</a> alongside other international news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/01/wapo-discovers-uk-anti-austerity-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo Defines Obama&#039;s Afghan War Mission</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/22/wapo-defines-obamas-afghan-war-mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/22/wapo-defines-obamas-afghan-war-mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War/Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen DeYoung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The headline in today's Post, previewing Obama's speech tonight:
Obama’s challenge: Leaving, but not too quickly
 
Funny how it's not the other way around-- leaving too slowly would seem to be a larger political problem, given the state of public opinion.
The Post reports:
President Obama will face a stiff political challenge Wednesday in presenting his plan for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/todays_paper/A%20Section/2011-06-22/A/3/22.0.3908936824_epaper.html">today</a>'s<strong> Post</strong>, previewing Obama's speech tonight:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Obama’s challenge: Leaving, but not too quickly</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Funny how it's not the other way around-- leaving too slowly would seem to be a larger political problem, given the state of public opinion.</p>
<p>The <strong>Post </strong>reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>President Obama will face a stiff political challenge Wednesday in presenting his plan for a gradual end to the U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan. <strong>His prime-time</strong> <strong>address must remind a skeptical electorate and a concerned Congress that the country’s longest war remains worth fighting — and funding — for several more years.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Why is it that Obama must "remind" the public that the war is worth fighting--and not <em><strong>convince</strong></em>? You can't really remind people of something they disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/22/wapo-defines-obamas-afghan-war-mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo&#039;s Very Balanced Coverage of Netroots Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/20/wapos-very-balanced-coverage-of-netroots-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/20/wapos-very-balanced-coverage-of-netroots-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netroots Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post had a report on Sunday (6/19/11) from the left-liberal Netroots Nation conference. Actually, it's a report from two conferences: The Netroots event and a smaller right-wing affair which schedules its conference to coincide with the larger, liberal get-together--for a reason:
RightOnline’s conference is smaller (about 1,200 people to Netroots’ 2,500) and more focused [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Washington Post</strong> had a report on Sunday (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/todays_paper/A%20Section/2011-06-19/A/4/22.0.3849168231_epaper.html">6/19/11</a>) from the left-liberal Netroots Nation conference. Actually, it's a report from two conferences: The Netroots event and a smaller right-wing affair which schedules its conference to coincide with the larger, liberal get-together--for a reason:</p>
<blockquote><p>RightOnline’s conference is smaller (about 1,200 people to Netroots’ 2,500) and more focused on strategy than policy. RightOnline always makes sure to be in the same city,<strong> so the get-together is guaranteed more media attention</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mission accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/20/wapos-very-balanced-coverage-of-netroots-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

