<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; tea parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/tea-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tea Party News Proves MSM Still &#039;Wired for the GOP&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/15/tea-party-news-proves-msm-still-wired-for-the-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/15/tea-party-news-proves-msm-still-wired-for-the-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Benen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Monthly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In citing how Talking Points Memo creator Josh Marshall "has talked many times about the ways in which the Washington establishment is 'wired for the GOP,'" Steve Benen (Political Animal, 9/13/09) notes that "the Washington Post offers a helpful example today"--as posted on Media Matters: "Behold the media's glaring double standard. Today, the Post puts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In citing how <strong>Talking Points Memo</strong> creator Josh Marshall "has talked many times about the ways in which the Washington establishment is '<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/02/wired.php" target="_blank">wired for the GOP</a>,'" Steve Benen (<strong>Political Animal</strong>, <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_09/019916.php" target="_blank">9/13/09</a>) notes that "the <strong>Washington Post</strong> offers a helpful <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909130006" target="_blank">example</a> today"--as posted on Media Matters: "Behold the media's glaring double standard. Today, the <strong>Post</strong> puts the 'tens of thousands' of Obama-hating tea bagger protesters on A1; makes it the lead story as a matter of fact."</p>
<blockquote><p>Compare and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/columns/200908250002" target="_blank">contrast</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>And just so there's no doubt in people's mind, the blanket coverage the mini-mobs are lapping up (i.e., the mobs are hugely important!) stands in stark contrast to the way the press often did its best to ignore liberal protesters who spoke out against the war in Iraq.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
For instance, in October 2002, when more than 100,000 people gathered in Washington, D.C., to oppose the war, the Washington Post put the story not on the front page, but in the Metro section with, as the paper's ombudsman later lamented, "a couple of ho-hum photographs that captured the protest's fringe elements."</p></blockquote>
<p>Not that crowd size is the be-all, end-all of an event's significance, but it's worth remembering that no credible count of yesterday's right-wing protest puts it in the 100,000 range. (And the anti-war protesters didn't have the advantage of a highly-rated cable network <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/tea-parties-and-false-balance/">promoting</a> their event every day for months.)...</p>
<p>But I still think it gets back to the fact that D.C. is just "wired" for Republicans. Anti-war protesters, the thinking goes, were liberal hippies out of step with the mainstream. After all, there was a Republican president and Republican House in 2002, and polls showed reasonably strong support for the war in Iraq. Why pretend the liberal protesters are important?</p>
<p>In contrast, seven years later, Tea Baggers have to be considered a major political movement. There's a Democratic president and a Democratic Congress in 2009, and polls show reasonably strong support for the administration's economic agenda, but the right-wing cries can't be relegated to a few throw-away paragraphs in the Metro section.</p></blockquote>
<p>Benen further quotes Barack Obama's <strong>60 Minutes</strong> statement that "in the era of 24-hour cable news cycles, the loudest shrillest voices get the attention," but explains "that's only partially true--it depends on what the shrill voices are saying and from what perspective." See the FAIR Action Alert: "Fox Hunting Trumps Peace Activism at Washington Post &amp; NYT" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1644">9/30/02</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/15/tea-party-news-proves-msm-still-wired-for-the-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greg Mitchell on Fox&#039;s &#039;Grassrootsy&#039; Astroturf</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/05/greg-mitchell-on-foxs-grassrootsy-astroturf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/05/greg-mitchell-on-foxs-grassrootsy-astroturf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor & Publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just one highlight in Brad Jacobson's wide-ranging interview of Editor &#38; Publisher's Greg Mitchell (Media Bloodhound, 5/5/09) is Mitchell's scorn for "media coverage of the anti-tax tea parties":
Greg Mitchell: Most amazing was that they tended to treat it like protests in the past. There have been national abortion rights protests and immigration rights protests and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one highlight in Brad Jacobson's wide-ranging interview of <strong>Editor &amp; Publisher</strong>'s Greg Mitchell (<strong>Media Bloodhound</strong>, <a href="http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/weblog/2009/05/the-mbh-interview-greg-mitchell-editor-of-editor-publisher-magazine.html" target="_blank">5/5/09</a>) is Mitchell's scorn for "media coverage of the anti-tax tea parties":</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Greg Mitchell:</strong> Most amazing was that they tended to <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/16/the-liberal-media-blackout-of-right-wing-tea-parties-continues/">treat it</a> like protests in the past. There have been national abortion rights protests and immigration rights protests and of course anti-war protests and everything spread out around the country. But never, that I'm aware of, has there ever been protests like this that were essentially <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/tea-parties-and-false-balance/">promoted</a> by a major news organization, that is <strong>Fox</strong>, who were actually promoting it, not just saying we're going to cover this. And so it was almost like the mainstream media was afraid to sort of say, "Look, this is not just grassrootsy or even sponsored by a national organization." It was also promoted by talk radio and promoted by the leading cable news network, which makes it a completely different thing than local activists who want to speak out. They're going to a rally to see <a title="Extra! Update: Flirting With Fascism" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3551" target="_self">Glenn Beck</a>. It's a whole different thing.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
Well worth reading, the interview also hits upon coverage of the McCain/Palin ticket, Internet media's effect on for-profit journalism and Jon Stewart's "boiling point."  Also listen to any of Mitchell's <strong>CounterSpin</strong> appearances--on topics as varied as media presentations of the U.S. bombing of <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2610">Hiroshima</a>, friendly fire-victim <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2525">Pat Tillman</a> and the <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1944"><strong>New York Times</strong>' mea culpa</a> for pre-Iraq War misreportage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/05/greg-mitchell-on-foxs-grassrootsy-astroturf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Liberal Media Blackout of Right-Wing Tea Parties Continues&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/16/the-liberal-media-blackout-of-right-wing-tea-parties-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/16/the-liberal-media-blackout-of-right-wing-tea-parties-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVNewser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nice round-up from TVNewser of the evening newscasts. Will conservatives ever catch a break from the left-wing media? 

How The Evening Newscasts Covered the Tea Parties


• NBC Nightly News led with two stories on tax day. Lee Cowan reported on the tea parties while Savannah Guthrie reported on the White House message of middle-class tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">A nice round-up from <strong><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/network_newsing/how_the_evening_newscasts_covered_the_tea_parties_114118.asp">TVNewser</a></strong> of the evening newscasts. Will conservatives ever catch a break from the left-wing media? </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><strong>How The Evening Newscasts Covered the Tea Parties</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">• <strong>NBC Nightly News</strong> led with two stories on tax day. Lee Cowan reported on the tea parties while Savannah Guthrie reported on the White House message of middle-class tax cuts. In his open, Brian Williams said the tea parties were "organized on the Internet and by some cable TV personalities."</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">• <strong>ABC's World News</strong> made it the third story. First a soundbite from President Obama and a Dan Harris story on the tea parties which were "cheered on by <strong>Fox News</strong> and talk radio," Harris explained. The Charles Gibson broadcast led with two stories on the pirate attacks--Jim Sciutto in Kenya with the crew of the Maersk Alabama and David Muir with a story on the attack of another U.S. ship.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">• <strong>CBS Evening News</strong> led with tax day--a soundbite from President Obama, a live picture of a rally in Arlington, Texas and a tea party story from Dean Reynolds. Reynolds referenced "a fistful of rightward leaning websites and commentators...embraced the cause," while showing Neil Cavuto and Glenn Beck at two different rallies.<br />
</span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/16/the-liberal-media-blackout-of-right-wing-tea-parties-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Boston Tea Party&#039;s Actual Successors</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/the-boston-tea-partys-actual-successors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/the-boston-tea-partys-actual-successors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the fuss about tea parties today, it's worth noting again that the original Boston tea party was not, as is often claimed, a protest against the British imposing a tax on tea.  What the colonists were actually objecting to was the British lowering the tax on tea in order to favor the East [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the fuss about <a title="FAIR Blog: Tea Parties and False Balance" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/tea-parties-and-false-balance/" target="_self">tea parties</a> today, it's worth noting <a title="Extra!: Reagan Revisionism" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3453" target="_self">again</a> that the original Boston tea party was not, as is often <a title="Fox Business: Where's My Money?!" href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/video-search/m/22101314/where-s-my-money-tax-tea-parties.htm" target="_blank">claimed</a>, a protest against the British imposing a tax on tea.  What the colonists were <a title="Common Dreams: The Real Boston Tea Party Was an Anti-Corporate Revolt" href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/15-10" target="_blank">actually</a> objecting to was the British <em>lowering</em> the tax on tea in order to favor the East India Company, the era's corporate giant, and undercut illegal tea smugglers. The real successors to the civil disobedience initiated by Samuel Adams in 1773 are not today's media-boosted events, but the protests against corporate globalization, big business monopolies and the war on drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/the-boston-tea-partys-actual-successors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

