<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; NPR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/npr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NPR, Lisa Simeone and Biased Opera Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/20/npr-lisa-simeone-and-biased-opera-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/20/npr-lisa-simeone-and-biased-opera-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Simeone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Public Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=19575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's quite a controversy brewing over freelance radio host Lisa Simeone for her participation with an  activist group occupying a park in Washington, D.C. It's a worth a look at how this unfolded-- especially since it appears to have cost her one of her jobs.
A report at the Roll Call website (10/18/11) noted that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's quite a controversy brewing over freelance radio host Lisa Simeone for her participation with an  activist group occupying a park in Washington, D.C. It's a worth a look at how this unfolded-- especially since it appears to have cost her one of her jobs.</p>
<p>A report at the <strong>Roll Call </strong>website (<a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_43/Breaking-the-Code-of-Ethics-209564-1.html">10/18/11</a>) noted that Simeone was acting as a spokesperson for the group, which goes by the name October 11. <strong>Roll Call </strong>wondered if this violated <strong>NPR</strong> ethics guidelines, since Simeone acts as a host on two programs that air on some <strong>NPR</strong> affiliates: the long-running documentary series <strong>Soundprint</strong> and the <strong>NPR World of Opera</strong>. (Neither show is produced by <strong>NPR</strong>; <strong>World of Opera</strong> is distributed by the network.)</p>
<p>Shortly after the <strong>Roll Call </strong>story appeared (and was picked up by other outlets like the conservative <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/19/npr-host-a-spokeswoman-for-occupy-d-c-possible-ethics-violation/"><strong>Daily Caller</strong></a>), <strong>NPR</strong> sent this internal memo, which was posted by activist David Swanson (Warisacrime.org, <a href="http://warisacrime.org/content/npr-gets-producer-fired-occupying">10/20/11</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>From: <strong>NPR </strong>Communications</p>
<p><strong>Sent:</strong> Wednesday, October 19, 2011 6:12 PM<br />
<strong>Subject:</strong> From Dana Rehm: Communications Alert<br />
<strong>To: </strong>      All Staff<br />
<strong>Fr: </strong>       Dana Davis Rehm<br />
<strong>Re:</strong>      Communications Alert</p>
<p>We recently learned of <strong>World of Opera</strong> host Lisa Simeone’s participation in an Occupy DC group. <strong>World of Opera</strong> is produced by <strong>WDAV</strong>, a music and arts station based in Davidson, North Carolina. The program is distributed by <strong>NPR</strong>. Lisa is not an employee of <strong>WDAV</strong> or <strong>NPR</strong>; she is a freelancer with the station.</p>
<p>We're in conversations with <strong>WDAV</strong> about how they intend to handle this. We of course take this issue very seriously.</p>
<p>As a reminder, all public comment (including social media) on this matter is being managed by <strong>NPR</strong> Communications.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
All media requests should be routed through <strong>NPR</strong> Communications at 202.513.2300 or mediarelations@npr.org. We will keep you updated as needed. Thanks.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>NPR </strong>posted the first two paragraphs of the memo as a <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thisisnpr/2011/10/19/141527202/clarification-regarding-lisa-simeone">blog item</a> shortly thereafter. Within a few hours, <strong>Soundprint</strong> fired Simeone (<strong>AP</strong>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-radio-host-fired-from-show-after-npr-questions-her-involvement-in-dc-protest/2011/10/20/gIQALtkG0L_print.html">10/20/11</a>), citing <strong>NPR</strong> ethics guidelines. It is not clear why the show, which has no apparent formal connection to <strong>NPR</strong>, would make this move. <strong>AP</strong> reported that Simeone was fired "after <strong>NPR</strong> questioned her involvement in a Washington protest," though <strong>NPR </strong>claims it had "no contact with the management of the program prior to their decision" (<strong>Poynter.org</strong>, <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/150174/npr-investigating-host-who-has-become-spokesperson-for-occupy-dc/">10/20/11</a>).</p>
<p>Simeone is not an <strong>NPR</strong> host or employee, but the network did seem to be taking some sort of active role in the decisions about her employment status.</p>
<p><strong>NPR</strong>'s <a href="http://www.npr.org/about/aboutnpr/ethics/ethics_code.html">Ethics Code</a> forbids journalists from participating "in marches and rallies involving causes or issues that <strong>NPR</strong> covers," and it also states that "<strong>NPR</strong> journalists may not engage in public relations work." The code "also applies to material provided to <strong>NPR</strong> by independent producers." But <strong>NPR</strong> there are exceptions, such as a "freelancer who primarily does arts coverage." The <strong>NPR </strong>code also states, "There may be instances in which the type of programming may not demand the application of a particular principle in this code."</p>
<p><strong>WDAV</strong>, the station that produces <strong>World of Opera</strong>, <a href="http://blogs.wdav.org/2011/10/20/more-on-wdav-world-of-opera/">decided</a> today that Simeone could continue to host the show:</p>
<blockquote><p>As host of <em>World of Opera</em>, Lisa Simeone is an independent  contractor of <strong>WDAV Classical Public Radio</strong>. Ms. Simeone’s activities  outside of this job are not in violation of any of WDAV's employee codes  and have had no effect on her job performance at <strong>WDAV</strong>. Ms. Simeone  remains the host of <em>World of Opera</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>That would seem like good news.</p>
<p>But <strong>NPR</strong>'s handling of this is a reminder that it has never been entirely clear what kind of political positions <strong>NPR</strong> deems objectionable.  News reporter Mara Liasson once denounced antiwar Democratic politicians on <strong>Fox News Channel</strong> (10/3/02): "These guys are a disgrace. Look, everybody knows it's Politics 101 that you don't go to an adversary country, an enemy country, and badmouth the United States, its policies and the president of the United States. I mean, these guys ought to, I don't know, resign."</p>
<p>The comments caused some controversy (<strong>NPR</strong>'s ombud wrote a column on <a href="http://www.npr.org/yourturn/ombudsman/2003/030730.html">7/20/03</a>), but obviously Liasson was not removed from her job as a reporter. Cokie Roberts is apparently free to take political stances, given her role as an analyst.</p>
<p><strong>NPR</strong>'s new president Gary Knell has stated his desire to "calm the waters" and "depoliticize" the debate over public radio (<strong>FAIR Blog</strong>, <a href="../2011/10/07/you-cant-take-politics-out-of-the-public-broadcasting-debate/">10/7/11</a>) in response to Republican politicians' desire to cut funding for public broadcasting. Incidents like the revelation of Simeone's activism are likely to provide fodder for right-wing complaints about the "liberal bias" of <strong>NPR</strong>. One understandable response is derision. <strong>Time</strong>'s James Poniewozik <a href="http://entertainment.time.com/2011/10/20/npr-listeners-may-finally-be-protected-from-opera-bias/?iid=ent-main-lede">writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Public radio listeners! Have you long worried that your station was  undermining capitalism through its broadcasts of the Ring Cycle? Tired  of having your children brainwashed by the socialistic messages of <em>La Traviata</em>?</p></blockquote>
<p>Poniewozik argues that firing Simeone "would be a stupid, stupid decision"--but that due to the politicization of the funding debate <strong>NPR</strong> is "practically obligated to overreact when a staff member or even freelancer comes within 200 feet of a political opinion."</p>
<p>It's beyond absurd that there's really even a controversy over whether the freelance host of an opera show should be fired for political activism. But let it be a reminder to<strong> NPR</strong>'s new president: It's going to be nearly impossible to  "depoliticize" this debate, given the vehemence of your right-wing critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/20/npr-lisa-simeone-and-biased-opera-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR Studies NPR&#039;s Gender Balance</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/04/05/npr-studies-nprs-gender-balance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/04/05/npr-studies-nprs-gender-balance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=14136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR ombud Alicia Shepard has posted an article (4/2/10) headlined "Where Are the Women?,"  a summary of a study of the gender diversity of high-profile NPR programs.
The most important findings:
With the aid of NPR librarian Hannah Sommers, we compiled a list of regular commentators, who are not NPR employees but are paid to appear on air. There are 12 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NPR</strong> ombud Alicia Shepard has posted an article (<a href="http://www.npr.org/ombudsman/2010/04/where_are_the_women.html?ft=1&amp;f=17370252">4/2/10</a>) headlined "Where Are the Women?,"  a summary of a study of the gender diversity of high-profile <strong>NPR</strong> programs.</p>
<p>The most important findings:</p>
<blockquote><p>With the aid of <strong>NPR</strong> librarian Hannah Sommers, we compiled a list of regular commentators, who are not <strong>NPR</strong> employees but are paid to appear on air. There are 12 outside commentators who appeared at least 20 times in the last 15 months. The only woman is former <strong>NPR</strong> staffer, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=2101090%20">Cokie Roberts</a> (51 times), who is on <strong>ME</strong> [<strong>Morning Edition</strong>] most Mondays talking politics.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
And:</p>
<blockquote><p>We also looked at the number of people from outside <strong>NPR</strong> who were interviewed by <strong>NPR</strong> news shows, or whose voices appeared in reporters' stories. For this analysis, we examined 104 shows, using a "constructed week" sampling technique from April 13, 2009 to January 9, 2010.</p>
<p>Those figures are equally discouraging.</p>
<p><strong>NPR</strong> listeners heard 2,502 male sources and 877 female sources on the shows we sampled. In other words, only 26 percent of the 3,379 voices were female, while 74 percent were male.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shepard pointed out that women are much more prominent as reporters and hosts on <strong>NPR</strong>--close to 50-50.</p>
<p>The findings about <strong>NPR</strong> sources reflect only a slight improvement over the gender imbalance documented in previous FAIR studies of <strong>NPR</strong> programming: A study looking at shows from 1991 (<strong>Extra!</strong>, 4-5/93; press release, <a title="Press Release: Study Finds National Public Radio Fails To Reflect Public" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2605" target="_self">3/29/93</a>) found only 19 percent female sources, while a study of 2003 sources (<strong>Extra!</strong>, <a title="Extra!: How Public Is Public Radio?" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1180" target="_self">5-6/04</a>) turned up 21 percent. In terms of commentators, <strong>NPR</strong> might have been doing slightly better in 1991, when four of 27 commentators featured more than once were women.</p>
<p><strong>Morning Edition</strong> host <a title="Extra!: No Children in Palestine" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2635" target="_self">Steve Inskeep</a> expresses his problems with the survey; he calls it "unsatisfying," though the same could be said for his criticism. He suggests, without offering evidence, that <strong>NPR</strong>'s lengthier in-studio interviews are more often with female guests; when public broadcasters have offered similar rationalizations in response to FAIR criticism in the past, such objections haven't held up (Activism Update, <a title="Activism Update: PBS Responds to FAIR NewsHour Study" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2977" target="_self">10/18/06</a>).</p>
<p>The upshot is that <strong>NPR</strong> says it's trying hard to make improvements in this area, and they'll try even harder. But given the fact that 11 of the top 12 commentators on <strong>NPR</strong> are men, and that the only woman is <a title="Extra!: Field Guide to TV's Lukewarm Liberals" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2499" target="_self">Cokie Roberts</a>, it looks like they're not trying hard enough. Kudos to Shepard for doing this work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/04/05/npr-studies-nprs-gender-balance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive History on the Public Airwaves: U.S. vs. U.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/05/progressive-history-on-the-public-airwaves-us-vs-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/05/progressive-history-on-the-public-airwaves-us-vs-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rendall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Zinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday marked the 25th anniversary of the end of the historic British miners strike of 1984-85. The BBC has a special broadcast in commemoration, The Ballad of the Miners Strike, featuring the voices of miners.
But where can Americans turn for commemorations of our progressive history? There is always Howard Zinn's excellent book, A People's History [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday marked the 25th anniversary of the end of the historic British miners strike of 1984-85. The <strong>BBC</strong> has a special broadcast in commemoration, <em><a href="The Radio Ballads - Ballad of the Miners' Strike">The Ballad of the Miners Strike</a></em>, featuring the voices of miners.</p>
<p>But where can Americans turn for commemorations of our progressive history? There is always Howard Zinn's excellent book, <em>A People's History of the United States</em>.  But turn on <strong>NPR</strong>, the closest thing the U.S. has to the <strong>BBC</strong>, and the closest you'll get to the people's history is the <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4009">denunciation of Zinn</a>.<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/05/progressive-history-on-the-public-airwaves-us-vs-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR Boosts &#039;Dominance of Private Health Insurance&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/01/npr-boosts-dominance-of-private-health-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/01/npr-boosts-dominance-of-private-health-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Things Considered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Seabrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of six]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mytwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR Check]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analyzing "The Art of Framing at NPR" on his NPR Check blog, Mytwords (8/29/09) thinks that "there are many ways you could frame the role of Sen. Kent Conrad, one of the gang of six senators who are working very hard to preserve the profitable dominance of private health insurance in the U.S.--such as "marvel[ing] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analyzing "The Art of Framing at <strong>NPR</strong>" on his <strong>NPR Check</strong> blog, Mytwords (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/08/art-of-framing-at-npr.html" target="_blank">8/29/09</a>) thinks that "there are many ways you could frame the role of Sen. Kent Conrad, one of the gang of six senators who are working very hard to preserve the profitable dominance of private health insurance in the U.S.--such as "marvel[ing] at why <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/53115/gang-of-six-not-quite-the-voice-of-the-nation" target="_blank">six senators</a> representing less than 3 percent of the U.S. population are <a title="ad-viewing required" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/08/23/gang_of_six/index.html" target="_blank">controlling</a> the fate of health insurance reform," or possibly by taking a serious "look at the <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/eades/2009/07/gang-of-sickos-six-us-senators.php" target="_blank">obscene amounts</a> of campaign cash flowing into these senators' <a href="http://boldprogressives.org/PublicOption/factsheet.html" target="_blank">coffers</a> from the for-profit health insurance industry and its allies."</p>
<p>"Ah, but not on <strong>NPR</strong>," writes Mytwords, when citing how <strong>All Things Considered</strong>'s Andrea Seabrook "<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112345146" target="_blank">explains</a> Kent Conrad's opposition to the pubic option and offer of health insurance co-ops as the result of his expertise on fighting government deficits and his commitment to centrism and bipartisanship."<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Mytwords' response:</p>
<blockquote><p>There's just one little, tiny problem with all this emphasis on expertise, budget deficits and BIG, NEW PROBLEMS, great co-ops, and winning Republican votes: It doesn't wash. First, there is <a href="http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/08/dont-succumb-to-deficit-hysteria.html" target="_blank">no consensus</a> that deficit spending is a bad thing. As far as the danger of a BIG, NEW GOVERNMENT PROGRAM costing sooooo much more money than what we've got--that's a <a href="http://www.correntewire.com/upping_ante_how_much_money_medicare_all_would_save_more_500_billion_way_more" target="_blank">factually challenged</a> assertion, too. But <a href="http://pnhp.org/blog/2009/08/17/exchanges-co-ops-and-cop-outs-on-health-care-reform/" target="_blank">Health Insurance Co-ops</a> are a good thing, like Credit Unions, right? <a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/142049/the_co-op_model_would_mostly_suceed_in_protecting_the_insurance_industry/" target="_blank">Wrong</a>, they are a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/opinion/21krugman.html?_r=1" target="_blank">sham</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tempted to throw the public broadcaster a bone by considering that, "Well, at least the bit about getting Republicans on board makes sense"? Mytwords points out how that is just "<a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/142041/surprise,_surprise_--_republicans_even_opposed_to_watered_down_health_reform/?comments=view&amp;cID=1296463&amp;pID=1296263" target="_blank">Wrong again</a>." Listen to the FAIR radio program <strong>CounterSpin:</strong> "Trudy Lieberman on Healthcare Reform" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3858">8/14/09</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/01/npr-boosts-dominance-of-private-health-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

