<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Newsday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/newsday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Media Side With &#039;Cognoscenti&#039; Over &#039;Broad Support for Single-Payer&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/09/media-cite-cognoscenti-over-broad-support-for-single-payer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/09/media-cite-cognoscenti-over-broad-support-for-single-payer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Bonham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpEd News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-payer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=6858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest installment of a Columbia Journalism Review series on "special interest groups... at Obama's table" and "how the media are covering them," Trudy Lieberman (CJR.org, 3/6/09) reports that 
Saul Friedman, who writes a popular column called Gray Matters for Newsday, has been almost alone in writing about what he has called a "blackout" [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest installment of a <strong>Columbia Journalism Review</strong> <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/who_will_be_at_the_table_archi" target="_blank">series</a> on "special interest groups... at Obama's table" and "how the media are covering them," Trudy Lieberman (<strong>CJR.org</strong>, <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/who_will_be_at_the_table_5.php?page=all&amp;pri" target="_blank">3/6/09</a>) reports that </p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=9600">Saul Friedman</a>, who writes a popular column called <strong>Gray Matters</strong> for <strong>Newsday</strong>, has been almost alone in writing about what he has called a "blackout" on discussions of a single-payer health system. <!--preview-break--> Last month, AARP's chief (and super influential) lobbyist, John Rother, <a href="http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/saturday/act2/ny-saul6043524feb21,0,3289349.column" target="_blank">told Friedman</a> that although there is broad support for single-payer, the cognoscenti didn’t feel that it was a pragmatic solution.</p></blockquote>
<p>While stating that "there are vocal pockets of single-payer activism around the country," Lieberman turns to an independent outlet when noting that "a woman named Laura Bonham wrote an <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Americans-Should-Not-Stand-by-by-Laura-Bonham--090207-542.html" target="_blank">impassioned piece</a> for <strong>OpEdNews.com</strong> urging Americans to reject the lockdown on a single-payer discussion." See our Media Advisory about the new FAIR Study: "Media Blackout on Single-Payer Healthcare: Proponents of Popular Policy Shut Out of Debate" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3733">3/6/09</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/09/media-cite-cognoscenti-over-broad-support-for-single-payer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tragedy of Gail Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/12/the-tragedy-of-gail-collins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/12/the-tragedy-of-gail-collins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gail Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times columnist Gail Collins is really kind of a tragic figure. She used to write for the Long Island paper Newsday, finding a way to cover New York State politics from Albany in a way that was both informative and funny--no mean feat.  Then she went to work for the Times and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New York Times</strong> columnist Gail Collins is really kind of a tragic figure. She used to write for the Long Island paper <strong>Newsday</strong>, finding a way to cover New York State politics from Albany in a way that was both informative and funny--no mean feat.  Then she went to work for the <strong>Times</strong> and has never been the same since.  <a title="NYT: The Stump Theory" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/opinion/12collins.html" target="_blank">Today</a> she's got a piece about how an old dog won a dog show and how a number of people in public life are old.</p>
<p>She used to be a writer whose work could be compared to that of <a title="Extra: Molly Ivins, 1944-2007" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3494" target="_self">Molly Ivins</a>. Now she seems like she's trying to understudy for <a title="The Daily Howler" href="http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh013009.html">Maureen Dowd</a>.  It's a warning to us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/12/the-tragedy-of-gail-collins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

