<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; National Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/national-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conservative Exclusion Is a Right-Wing Delusion</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/06/25/conservative-exclusion-is-a-right-wing-delusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/06/25/conservative-exclusion-is-a-right-wing-delusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathleen Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Harvey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whittaker Chambers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=14933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Review senior editor Jay Nordlinger (Corner, 3/24/10), responding to CNN pairing disgraced Democratic Gov. Eliot Spitzer with a not-conservative-enough-for-National-Review Kathleen Parker, muses:
I'm reminded why conservatives had to build their own media outlets. It's sort of like Jews and country clubs. Jews built their own, not because they wanted to, necessarily, but because the other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>National Review</strong> senior editor Jay Nordlinger (Corner, 3/24/10), responding to <strong>CNN</strong> pairing disgraced Democratic Gov. <a title="FAIR Blog: Oxymoron: Murdoch Media Ethics" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/06/25/oxymoron-murdoch-media-ethics/" target="_self">Eliot Spitzer</a> with a not-conservative-enough-for-<strong>National-Review</strong> <a title="FAIR Blog: Kathleen Parker's Mainstream Isn't About the Ballet Shoes" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/05/12/kathleen-parkers-mainstream-isnt-about-the-ballet-shoes/" target="_self">Kathleen Parker</a>, muses:</p>
<blockquote><p>I'm reminded why conservatives had to build their own media outlets. It's sort of like Jews and country clubs. Jews built their own, not because they wanted to, necessarily, but because the other clubs wouldn't let them in. They weren't being "clannish." They wanted to play golf, on first-class courses....</p>
<p>Well, we conservatives built our own media outlets--because the other clubs wouldn't let us in. I guess it's working out OK.</p></blockquote>
<p>Blogger Ryan McNeely (<strong>Yglesias</strong>, <a title="Yglesias: Discrimination Against Minorities and Conservatives is “Sort of” The Same" href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/06/discrimination-against-minorities-and-conservatives-is-sort-of-the-same/" target="_blank">3/24/10</a>) takes issue with the comparison of put-upon conservative pundits with ethnic discrimination. But the idea that conservatives were ever excluded from corporate media in the first place is nothing but a delusion.</p>
<p>Presumably one of the outlets conservatives built that Nordlinger has in mind was his own <strong>National Review</strong>.  One of the writers founding editor William F. Buckley first recruited for his staff was <a title="Heritage Foundation: Whittaker Chambers" href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2001/04/Whittaker-Chambers-Man-of-Courage-and-Faith" target="_blank">Whittaker Chambers</a>, the famous former Communist turned arch-conservative. <!--preview-break--> Chambers' previous perch was at <strong>Time</strong> magazine,  where he was considered the magazine's most important writer. He had already made his conversion to the right when he went to <strong>Time</strong> ("Pinkos who did not  bat an eye when the Soviet government exterminated 3,000,000 peasants  by famine will go for a good cry over the hardships of the Okies," he wrote in a movie review of <em>The Grapes of Wrath</em>--<a title="Time: The New Pictures" href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,884004,00.html" target="_blank">2/12/40</a>), but Henry Luce had no problem taking him on board. (Buckley himself, of course, had a prominent 33-year-career on that notorious <a title="Extra!: Time to Unplug CPB" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2671" target="_self">suppressor of conservatives</a>, <strong>PBS</strong>.)</p>
<p>In the bad old days, when no one would let conservatives work in the media, who was the country's most prominent columnist? Walter Winchell, defender of Joseph McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover. Similar politics didn't stop <a title="FAIR Blog: Paul Harvey's Attempted Hoax Was Beginning of Beautiful Friendship" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/01/23/paul-harveys-attempted-hoax-was-beginning-of-beautiful-friendship/" target="_self">Paul Harvey</a> from getting a daily slot for commentary on the <strong>ABC Radio Network</strong>.</p>
<p>The fact is that many of the people who owned newspapers, magazines and radio stations--as you might expect of millionaire businessmen--were quite conservative: people like Robert McCormick, Harry Chandler and <a title="Slate: The Obama/Fox War Ain't Nothing" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2233605/pagenum/2" target="_blank">Frank Gannett</a>. These are the bosses who would have been barring conservatives from working in the media industry.  Doesn't make a whole lot of sense, does it?</p>
<div style="overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"><a style="color: #003399;" href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,884004,00.html#ixzz0rtqdS3X7"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/06/25/conservative-exclusion-is-a-right-wing-delusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Part of the National Psyche</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/11/a-part-of-the-national-psyche/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/11/a-part-of-the-national-psyche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramesh Ponnuru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Lowry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Victor Davis Hanson notes that one reason for American exceptionalism may be that we did not inherit from England "a large underclass of only quasi-free people attached to barons as serfs." Sadly, a worse institution took root here, but never became part of the national psyche.
--Rich Lowry &#38; Ramesh Ponnuru (National Review Online, 3/8/10, via [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a title="Media Views: Horse's Mouth: Washington Post Scrapes Bottom of Barrel" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=8752" target="_self">Victor Davis Hanson</a> notes that one reason for American exceptionalism may be that we did not inherit from England "a large underclass of only quasi-free people attached to barons as serfs." Sadly, a worse institution took root here, but never became part of the national psyche.</p>
<p>--<a title="FAIR Blog: Palin Smiles, Winks--Pundit 'Mesmerized'" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/09/palin-smiles-winks-pundit-mesmerized/">Rich Lowry</a> &amp; Ramesh Ponnuru (<strong>National Review Online</strong>, <a title="NRO: America the Exceptional, Again" href="http://article.nationalreview.com/427178/america-the-exceptional-again/rich-lowry-ramesh-ponnuru?page=2" target="_blank">3/8/10</a>, via <strong>Crooked Timber</strong>, <a title="Crooked Timber: America's Brush With Slavery" href="http://crookedtimber.org/2010/03/09/americas-brush-with-slavery/" target="_blank">3/9/10</a>)</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>So, David Paterson will become the massa who gets to appoint whoever gets to take [Rep. Eric] Massa's place. So, for the first time in his life, Paterson's gonna be a massa. Interesting, interesting.</p>
<p>--<a title="LAT: Limbaugh A Color Man Who Has a Problem With Color?" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2549" target="_self">Rush Limbaugh</a> (<strong>Rush Limbaugh Show</strong>, 3/9/10, via Media Matters, <a title="Media Matters: Limbaugh: &quot;For the first time in his life, Paterson is gonna be a massa&quot; if he chooses Massa's replacement" href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201003090035" target="_blank">3/9/10</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/11/a-part-of-the-national-psyche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Calls to Bomb (Any) Somalians</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/22/more-calls-to-bomb-any-somalians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/22/more-calls-to-bomb-any-somalians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Huber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholars and Rogues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Cropsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Davis Hanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking the brave position (ScholarsAndRogues.com, 4/20/09) that the National Review Online is so bad that it makes William F. Buckley's print version look "semi-respectable" by comparison, former U.S. Navy Commander Jeff Huber writes that in his April 11 NRO post, "military historian and former classics professor Victor Davis Hanson comes across like a rabid war [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking the brave position (<strong>ScholarsAndRogues.com</strong>, <a href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/20/scurvy-dogs-of-war/" target="_blank">4/20/09</a>) that the <strong>National Review Online</strong> is <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/09/palin-smiles-winks-pundit-mesmerized/">so bad</a> that it makes <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3406">William F. Buckley</a>'s print version look "semi-respectable" by comparison, former U.S. Navy Commander Jeff Huber writes that in his <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTc3NjU4NGU2YzQ4MDNhMTZjNmU4NTdmZjNmZWU4OGI=" target="_blank">April 11</a> <strong>NRO</strong> post, "military historian and former classics professor <a title="Media Views" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=8752" target="_self">Victor Davis Hanson</a> comes across like a rabid war mongrel":</p>
<blockquote><p>Frothing over the recent Somali pirate caper involving a U.S. flagged merchant ship, Davis insists that, "To end Somali piracy, disproportionate measures against the shore should be taken--for every one pirate assault, a lethal air assault should immediately follow." It's perhaps understandable that Hanson doesn’t mention what Somalia offers in the way of suitable air strike targets; underdeveloped nations like Somalia don't have any. <!--preview-break--> Hanson probably doesn't understand that, because like so many hawkish military historians, he doesn't understand anything about the military. He doesn't know much about warfare theory, either. He calls for extreme (though ineffectual) military measures in response to something he admits "may not be a matter of American national security" committed not by a peer competitor or a group of global extremists but by "two-bit pirates." When a giant purposely crushes an anthill, he's not pursuing a political objective; he's feeding his perversions. That, like waterboarding someone <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/20/abcs-2007-pro-waterboarding-propaganda/">183 times</a>, is not the sort of thing a global hegemon needs to be doing, Victor.</p></blockquote>
<p>Calling things "even wackier at the other end of the nut farm," Huber further points to one issue of the <strong>Weekly Standard</strong> in which both "<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/876qyutv.asp" target="_blank">Barnacle Bill Kristol</a>" and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Cropsey" target="_blank">Seth Cropsey</a> call for U.S. troops "going ashore in Africa to destroy the pirates' safe havens"--a bellicose position <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/14/bill-oreillys-pirate-solution/">lamentably popular</a> across many right-wing media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/22/more-calls-to-bomb-any-somalians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

