USA Today's point in covering this weekend's anti-choice "March for Life" is is to note that, 40 years after the Roe v. Wade decision, the country is divided on abortion rights. That's an odd way of describing a 24-point spread in public opinion
The national media watch group
Get FAIR’s Action Alerts
Topics
- anonymity (20)
- Barack Obama (175)
- Books (9)
- Cable TV (270)
- CounterSpin (3)
- Crime (20)
- Economy (540)
- Budget (78)
- Labor (29)
- Social Security (57)
- Taxes (70)
- Trade (3)
- Education (27)
- Election (340)
- Environment (141)
- Climate Change (49)
- Energy (20)
- Nuclear power (12)
- Factchecking (25)
- First Amendment (35)
- Gender (91)
- Healthcare (130)
- Medicare (13)
- International (765)
- Africa (26)
- Asia (122)
- Afghanistan (87)
- China (4)
- Japan (3)
- Pakistan (19)
- Europe (23)
- Latin America (49)
- Mideast (383)
- United Nations (2)
- Internet (47)
- Huffington Post (7)
- Politico (8)
- WikiLeaks (11)
- Islamophobia (17)
- LGBT (11)
- magazines (139)
- New York (3)
- New Yorker (7)
- Newsweek (50)
- Time (62)
- Media Activism (47)
- Media Business (172)
- Advertisers (49)
- Media Criticism (634)
- Media policy (5)
- Mitt Romney (40)
- Network TV (332)
- News services (47)
- newspapers (876)
- L.A. Times (27)
- New York Post (3)
- New York Times (522)
- USA Today (72)
- Wall Street Journal (23)
- Washington Post (329)
- Politics (228)
- Polling (47)
- protest (35)
- Race (152)
- Immigration (22)
- radio (49)
- Clear Channel (4)
- NPR (38)
- social media (1)
- sports (4)
- War/Military (150)
