<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Morning Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/morning-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NPR Debate: &#039;False Distortion&#039; vs. &#039;Fact-Based Statement&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/05/npr-debate-false-distortion-vs-fact-based-statement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/05/npr-debate-false-distortion-vs-fact-based-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Ignani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mytwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Horsely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hess]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR Check blogger mytwords has taken the time (8/4/09) to closely "consider [Scott] Horsely's verbal sleight of hand" on National Public Radio's August 4 Morning Edition:
He equates a completely false distortion--characterizing the tepid Democratic health reform proposals as "government-run healthcare" in opposition to "the free market"--with a completely fact-based statement--"we have a system today that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NPR Check</strong> blogger mytwords has taken the time (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/08/bedeviled.html" target="_blank">8/4/09</a>) to closely "consider [Scott] Horsely's verbal sleight of hand" on <strong>National Public Radio</strong>'s <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111527054" target="_blank">August 4</a> <strong>Morning Edition</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>He equates a completely false distortion--characterizing the tepid Democratic health reform proposals as "government-run healthcare" in opposition to "the free market"--with a completely fact-based statement--"we have a system today that works well for the insurance industry but it doesn't work well for you [the public]." Yes, the system works well (insurance profits <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/06/healthcare_market_characterized_by_consolidation_n.php?ref=fpblg" target="_blank">more than quadrupled</a> from 2000 to 2007) but not for the public, which pays <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/report/2009062623/health-insurance-coverage-keeps-shrinking-premiums-family-costs-climb-even-higher" target="_blank">more for less</a> and suffers about <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jul/30/bill-pascrell/pascrell-says-22000-americans-die-yearly-because-t/" target="_blank">22,000 deaths</a> a year from the insurance industry's commitment to not covering people. How could anyone cast them as the villain?<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Having set up this falsehood, Horsely turns to health insurance industry <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">vampire</span> representative, Karen Ignani (no stranger at at <strong>NPR</strong>--see <a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/03/smooth-operators.html" target="_blank">March 7, 2009</a> and <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105366952" target="_blank">June 13, 2009</a>), so she can claim how wrong Obama's statement is because <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">the mob</span> her industry supports "reforms."</p></blockquote>
<p>But that's not all--"Horsely ends this report with a bit of moralizing against the Democrats, noting that 'Brookings scholar [Stephen] Hess thinks it's unfortunate the Democrats have chosen to demonize health insurance companies.'" Leading mytwords to ponder: "Demonizing the health insurance companies, now <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3845">why</a> would anyone do that?"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/05/npr-debate-false-distortion-vs-fact-based-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR&#039;s Single-Payer-Free Healthcare Reportage</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/02/nprs-single-payer-less-healthcare-reportage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/02/nprs-single-payer-less-healthcare-reportage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dartmouth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Rovner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mytwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-payer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=10471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critiquing some more of National Public Radio's healthcare reportage, blogger Mytwords (NPR Check, 6/29/09) highlights Julie Rovner of Morning Edition "reporting this morning for the private health insurance lobby": "The healthcare cost debate pretty much comes down to this: 'You can't cut costs without hurting someone.'"
Rovner then backs up her "analysis" with "a little Meet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critiquing some <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/20/npr-airs-all-important-underwritten-views/">more</a> of <strong>National Public Radio</strong>'s healthcare reportage, blogger Mytwords (<strong>NPR Check</strong>, <a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/06/between-fred-thompson-and-american.html" target="_blank">6/29/09</a>) highlights Julie Rovner of <strong>Morning Edition</strong> "<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106028653" target="_blank">reporting</a> this morning for the private health insurance lobby": "The healthcare cost debate pretty much comes down to this: 'You can't cut costs without hurting someone.'"</p>
<p>Rovner then backs up her "analysis" with "a little <strong>Meet the Press</strong> sound-bite from <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=9033">Fred Thompson</a>"--"The only way to really save cost is to have rationing or it can be done by a cram-down by the government and take it out of the hides of doctors, hospitals":<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>Rovner's report mainly serves to highlight and promote the research of Elliott Fisher of the Dartmouth Institute. The big deal is that Fisher has found that some areas in the U.S. with lower cost prices for healthcare have better outcomes. Funny thing is that on <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105263204" target="_blank">June 11</a>, 2009, <strong>NPR</strong> featured this exact research. An interesting thing not mentioned on <strong>NPR</strong> is the chief "<a href="http://tdi.dartmouth.edu/about/partners/">partners</a>" of the Dartmouth Institute. On the list are</p>
<ul>
<li>Wellpoint Foundation</li>
<li>Aetna Foundation</li>
<li>United Health Foundation</li>
</ul>
<p>I do smell a conflict of interest, eh?</p>
<p>Rovner fills out the report by going to a solid centrist--Len Nichols (<a href="http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/modest_proposal_competing_public_health_plan" target="_blank">no single-payer</a>, he)--of the New America Foundation (as far left as <strong>NPR</strong> dare venture).</p></blockquote>
<p>Don't worry, though--"the wrap-up is provided by Joe Antos of the far-right <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/nonpartisan-aei/" target="_blank">American Enterprise Institute</a>, who concludes that real change to healthcare is a cultural/behavioral issue more than a cost issue." Read the new issue of FAIR's magazine <strong>Extra!:</strong> "Media Quarantine of Single-Payer Continues: Fifteen Years Later, Public Health Insurance Still Taboo" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3793">6/09</a>) by Julie Hollar and Isabel Macdonald.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/02/nprs-single-payer-less-healthcare-reportage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR: &#039;Justifying and Sanitizing the U.S. Torture Regime&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/06/npr-justifying-and-sanitizing-the-us-torture-regime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/06/npr-justifying-and-sanitizing-the-us-torture-regime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 03:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Things Considered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mytwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogging on how May 4 and 5 broadcasts "feature NPR continuing its function of justifying and sanitizing the U.S. torture regime," dedicated public radio critic Mytwords (NPR Check, 5/5/09) plumbs the depths of NPR's aversion to "human rights or international law advocates or experts"--instead preferring "members or former members of various U.S. government agencies," even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging on how <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103787285" target="_blank">May 4</a> and <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103792752" target="_blank">5</a> broadcasts "feature <strong>NPR</strong> continuing its function of justifying and sanitizing the U.S. torture regime," dedicated public radio critic Mytwords (<strong>NPR Check</strong>, <a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/05/tick-tick-tick.html" target="_blank">5/5/09</a>) plumbs the depths of <strong>NPR</strong>'s aversion to "human rights or international law advocates or experts"--instead preferring "members or former members of various U.S. government agencies," even "the very ones implicated in formulating and carrying out torture":</p>
<blockquote><p>For a long time <strong>NPR</strong> news has minimized (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2006/06/inskeeps-sympathies.html" target="_blank">June 2006</a>), dismissed (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2007/02/truth-goggled-and-gagged.html" target="_blank">February 2007</a>), ignored (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2007/04/i-am-padilla.html" target="_blank">April 2007</a>), covered over (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2007/10/skipping-dirty-details.html" target="_blank">October 2007</a>) and collaborated with (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2007/12/this-is-pro-agency-story.html" target="_blank">December 2007</a>) the use of torture by agencies and agents of the U.S. government. You can search <strong>NPR</strong> news in vain for any original investigative work on exposing torture or on any serious elucidation of the laws and conventions that prohibit the U.S. from committing torture and require prosecution for violators.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
See the FAIR publication <strong>Extra! Update:</strong> "Tortured Justifications for Bad Journalism" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3413">12/07</a>) by Jim Naureckas &amp; Candice O'Grady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/06/npr-justifying-and-sanitizing-the-us-torture-regime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cokie Roberts: Bad Beyond Sports Analogies</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/04/cokie-roberts-bad-beyond-sports-analogies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/04/cokie-roberts-bad-beyond-sports-analogies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cokie Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Shafer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slate's Jack Shafer (5/1/09) has had his fill of NPR senior news analyst Cokie Roberts' "four minutes of on-air blather about politics, the economy and world events with whichever unlucky Morning Edition host has drawn the short straw" on Mondays. Shafer writes of how, "drained of controversy and conflict, the Cokie minutes provide perfect editorial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Slate</strong>'s Jack Shafer (<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2216890/" target="_blank">5/1/09</a>) has had his fill of <strong>NPR</strong> senior news analyst Cokie Roberts' "four minutes of on-air blather about politics, the economy and world events with whichever unlucky <strong>Morning Edition</strong> host has drawn the short straw" on Mondays. Shafer writes of how, "drained of controversy and conflict, the Cokie minutes provide perfect editorial balance if your idea of balance is zero":<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>I can think of no comparably sized media space that's as void of original insight and information as Roberts'. <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/archives/archive.php?thingId=2101090&amp;startNum=1" target="_blank">Her segments</a>, though billed as "analysis" by <strong>NPR</strong>, do little but speed-graze the headlines and add a few grace notes. If you're vaguely conversant with current events, you're already cruising at Roberts' velocity. Roberts doesn't just voice the conventional wisdom; she is the conventional wisdom.</p></blockquote>
<p>Initially wanting to "blame <strong>NPR</strong> for the segment's wretchedness or <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/02/nprs-5th-grade-math-exercise/">Morning Edition</a></strong> hosts Renee Montagne and Steve Inskeep for pitching her nothing but giant, slo-mo softballs," Shafer then reconsiders: "No, softball isn't the right sports analogy, if only because Roberts never puts wood on the questions. The segment really unfolds like a brief set of air tennis, with Roberts and a host play-acting a vigorous volley"--which might in some sense be lucky for listeners, considering <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/03/320/">what comes out</a> when Roberts actually tries to say something....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/04/cokie-roberts-bad-beyond-sports-analogies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

