<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Michael Shear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/michael-shear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Election Lesson: Hoover Was Right!</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/the-election-lesson-hoover-was-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/the-election-lesson-hoover-was-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Shear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Kane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reported (11/5/09) that some Democrats are "questioning whether they should emphasize job creation over some of the more ambitious items on the president's agenda." A couple paragraphs later, reporters Michael Shear and Paul Kane elaborate:
Moderate and conservative Democrats took a clear signal from Tuesday's voting, warning that the results prove that independent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Washington Post</strong> reported (<a title="WP: For parties, the soul-searching begins" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/04/AR2009110404833.html" target="_blank">11/5/09</a>) that some Democrats are "questioning whether they should emphasize job creation over some of the more ambitious items on the president's agenda." A couple paragraphs later, reporters Michael Shear and Paul Kane elaborate:</p>
<blockquote><p>Moderate and conservative Democrats took a clear signal from Tuesday's voting, warning that the results prove that independent voters are wary of Obama's far-reaching proposals and mounting spending, as well as the growing federal debt.</p></blockquote>
<p>The implication that  "job creation" is somehow at odds with "mounting spending" and "ambitious" or "far-reaching" government proposals is a another example of the <a title="FAIR Blog: Do 'Economists Say' Herbert Hoover Was Asked?" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/24/do-economists-say-herbert-hoover-was-right-really/" target="_self">neo-Hooverism</a> that corporate reporters seem to <a title="FAIR Blog: Obama Misleads by Not Promising Austerity" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/30/ap-obama-misleads-by-not-promising-austerity/" target="_blank">instinctively</a> <a title="FAIR Blog: WPost: Sacrifice for Sacrifice's Sake" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/09/wpost-sacrifice-for-sacrifices-sake/" target="_blank">subscribe</a> to.  In reality, spending money is one of the basic tools governments have for creating jobs during a recession--and cutting government spending is one of the surest ways to make that recession deeper.</p>
<p>It's worth noting that none of the sources actually quoted in the article makes the case that cutting federal spending would be a good way of creating jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/the-election-lesson-hoover-was-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
