<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Michael Clemente</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/michael-clemente/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fox&#039;s Flawed Football Analogy</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/23/foxs-flawed-football-analogy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/23/foxs-flawed-football-analogy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Clemente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House's beef with Fox News Channel continues, as do the right-wing cable channel's bizarre attempts to defend their journalistic integrity. Take this example from today's New York Times (10/22/09). Obviously the White House is most offended by the likes of Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck; this is unfair, according to Fox:
But Michael Clemente, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House's beef with <strong>Fox News Channel</strong> continues, as do the right-wing cable channel's bizarre attempts to defend their journalistic integrity. Take this example from today's <strong>New York Times</strong> (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us/politics/23fox.html?_r=1&amp;sq=journalism&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1&amp;pagewanted=print">10/22/0</a>9). Obviously the White House is most offended by the likes of Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck; this is unfair, according to <strong>Fox</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>But Michael Clemente, senior vice president for news and editorial programming at <strong>Fox</strong>, said the White House was conflating the network’s commentary with its news coverage. That, Mr. Clemente said, "would be like <strong>Fox News</strong> blaming the White House senior staff for the Washington Redskins' losing record."</p></blockquote>
<p>Last time I checked, there were no White House staffers moonlighting in the Redskins' front office. Beck and Hannity, on the other hand, actually work at <strong>Fox News Channel</strong>--and were put there by <strong>Fox </strong>bosses. The analogy makes no sense, but then again it's hard to imagine a better defense for <strong>Fox</strong>'s behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/23/foxs-flawed-football-analogy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

