<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Merck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/merck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Big Pharma&#039;s Big Deception</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/15/big-pharmas-big-deception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/15/big-pharmas-big-deception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fosamax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laika Spoetnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laika's MedLibLog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vioxx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical librarian blogger Laika Spoetnik (Laika's MedLibLog, 5/8/09) has taken a long look at the international media "tsunami" generated by the Australian paper's one sentence on "a fake Elsevier/Merck journal. It says: 'The drug company also allegedly produced an entire journal--called the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine--and passed it off as an independent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medical librarian blogger Laika Spoetnik (<strong>Laika's MedLibLog</strong>, <a href="http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/mercks-ghostwriters-haunted-papers-and-fake-elsevier-journals/" target="_blank">5/8/09</a>) has taken a long look at the international media "<a href="http://blog.bioethics.net/2009/05/merck-makes-phony-peerreview-journal/" target="_blank">tsunami</a>" generated by the <strong>Australian</strong> paper's one <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25311725-5013871,00.html" target="_blank">sentence</a> on "a fake <strong>Elsevier</strong>/Merck journal. It says: 'The drug company also allegedly produced an entire journal--called the <strong>Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine</strong>--and passed it off as an independent peer review publication.'" Among Spoetnik's findings:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>It had the looks of a peer-reviewed medical journal, but contained only reprinted or summarized articles</li>
<li>Most of the articles presented data favorable to the Merck products Fosamax (for osteoporosis) and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/24/business/24drug.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=1" target="_blank">Vioxx</a>...</li>
<p><!--preview-break--></p>
<li>There are several ads for Fosamax and Vioxx</li>
<li>It is unclear who wrote the editorials...</li>
<li>There is no disclosure of company sponsorship</li>
<li>Merck paid an undisclosed sum to <strong>Elsevier</strong> to produce several volumes (confirmed by <strong>Elsevier</strong>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=7201">Unsurprised</a> by such <a title="Puffing Merck" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1520">odious</a> behavior from a pharmaceutical giant like Merck, Spoetnik still thinks it "remarkable that 'the reliable and authorative' <strong>Elsevier</strong>, publisher of journals like the <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2978">Lancet</a></strong> [and <a href="http://www.reedbusiness.com/index.asp?layout=productsAlpha" target="_blank">tons</a> of U.S. periodicals], lends itself to a biased publication of articles that only serve as promotional material."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/15/big-pharmas-big-deception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

