<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Marcus Brauchli</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/marcus-brauchli/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WaPo &#039;Screw-You&#039; Video Follows &#039;Mad Bitch&#039; Offense</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/wapo-screw-you-video-follows-mad-bitch-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/wapo-screw-you-video-follows-mad-bitch-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adele M. Stan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcus Brauchli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WashingtonPost.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women In Media & News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Women In Media &#38; News blogger Adele M. Stan (8/5/09) has some more to say about the WashingtonPost.com's "now-infamous 'Mad Bitch' video":
Last Friday, Talking Points Memo's Brian Beutler shone a light on a video produced by the Washington Post that featured one of the two columnists hosting the piece suggesting that, at a future [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guest <strong>Women In Media &amp; News</strong> blogger Adele M. Stan (<a href="http://www.wimnonline.org/WIMNsVoicesBlog/2009/08/05/responding-to-womens-concerns-washington-post-kills-offensive-video-series-cillizza-apologizes-milbank-whines/" target="_blank">8/5/09</a>) has some more to say about the <strong>WashingtonPost.com</strong>'s "now-infamous 'Mad Bitch' video":</p>
<blockquote><p>Last Friday, <strong>Talking Points Memo</strong>'s Brian Beutler <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/in-beer-summit-spoof-milbank-suggests-hillary-drink-mad-bitch-beer.php" target="_blank">shone a light</a> on a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907310026" target="_blank">video</a> produced by the <strong>Washington Post</strong> that featured one of the two columnists hosting the piece suggesting that, at a future White House beer summit, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton be given a brew called "Mad Bitch." Then all hell broke loose.</p>
<p>The <strong>Post</strong> apparently thought it could fix the problem by simply pulling the video. A note was posted above the hole where the video used to be, reading that the piece had been removed because it contained material that was "inappropriate" for the <strong>Post</strong> website. As if it had landed there from Mars. As if it hadn't been written and produced in the <strong>Washington Post</strong> building by <strong>Washington Post</strong> staffers.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Then, yesterday, the two columnists, Chris Cillizza and Dana Milbank, had the effrontery to post what amounts to a "screw-you" <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2009/07/06/VI2009070601109.html" target="_blank">response video</a> to the criticism they had received from bloggers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Stan reports that, in the fallout, "the series has been canceled," but "Milbank remains pretty unrepentant, instead <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/">whining</a> about the drubbing he took at the hands of blogosphere denizens."</p>
<p>Even after receiving a <a href="http://www.centerfornewwords.org/wam/wapoletter.php" target="_blank">critical letter</a> signed by Stan, Jennifer Pozman, Katha Pollitt and many others, <strong>Post</strong> executive editor Marcus "Brauchli, for his part, did not exactly apologize," and "it does not appear that there will be any disciplinary action."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/wapo-screw-you-video-follows-mad-bitch-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Much Truth in Advertising at the WaPo?</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/02/too-much-truth-in-advertising-at-the-wapo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/02/too-much-truth-in-advertising-at-the-wapo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katharine Weymouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcus Brauchli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=10524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The business department at the Washington Post has gotten into trouble in what may be a case of too much truth in advertising.
As reported by Politico (7/2/09), the Post circulated a flyer offering--for the low, low cost of $25,000--an "intimate and exclusive Washington Post salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The business department at the <strong>Washington Post</strong> has gotten into trouble in what may be a case of too much truth in advertising.</p>
<p>As reported by <strong>Politico</strong> (<a title="Politico: WashPost offers off-rec access to admin figures, journos for lobbyists" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/WashPost_offers_offrec_access_to_admin_figures_journos_for_lobbyists.html?showall">7/2/09</a>), the <strong>Post</strong> circulated a flyer offering--for the low, low cost of $25,000--an "intimate and exclusive<strong> Washington Post</strong> salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and publisher Katharine Weymouth." The circular promised the participation of "key Obama administration and congressional leaders" as well as "healthcare reporting and editorial staff members of the <strong>Washington Post</strong>."</p>
<p>Lest anyone be confused as to why dinner at the <strong>Post</strong>'s publisher's house would be worth $25,000, the flyer helpfully points out that  "an evening with the right people can alter the debate." It calls the event "an exclusive opportunity to participate in the healthcare reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done." It's quite straightforward: The Post is offering to help a deep-pocketed customer an opportunity to alter the healthcare reform process by granting access to government officials and its own journalists.</p>
<p>Naturally, one is not allowed to be that honest about the relationship between money, power and journalism in Washington, D.C.  A <strong>Post</strong> spokesperson told <a title="Politico: WashPost offers off-rec access to admin figures, journos for lobbyists" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/WashPost_offers_offrec_access_to_admin_figures_journos_for_lobbyists.html?showall" target="_blank"><strong>Politico</strong></a> that the advertisement was released "before it was properly vetted," and that the "draft does not represent what the company's vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers." Boy, that doesn't sound as much like it's worth 25 grand, does it?</p>
<p><strong>Post</strong> publisher Katharine Weymouth then did an <a title="WaPo: Post Publisher Cancels Plans for Off-the-Record 'Salons'" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070201563.html" target="_blank">interview</a> with employee Howard Kurtz in which she vowed they were "not going to do any dinners that would impugn the integrity of the newsroom." But she was aware "of the plans to host small dinners at her home and to charge lobbying and trade organizations for participation." And <strong>Post</strong> executive editor Marcus Brauchli said that "he had been involved in discussions, stretching back to last year, about newsroom participation in conferences"--but the good kind of conference, not the kind that makes you look like a sleazy influence-peddler.</p>
<p>So it looks like they're going to go ahead with these things--"We do believe there is an opportunity to have a conferences and events business, and that the <strong>Post</strong> should be leading these conversations," the <strong>Post</strong> statement to <strong>Politico</strong> said--but presumably next time they won't market them so nakedly as an exchange of money for power.  Don't worry, <strong>Post Co.</strong>, your clients will still know what they're buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/02/too-much-truth-in-advertising-at-the-wapo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
