<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; London Guardian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/london-guardian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#039;No Worries&#039; in Fox Coverage of Murdoch Crimes</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/13/no-worries-in-fox-coverage-of-murdoch-crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/13/no-worries-in-fox-coverage-of-murdoch-crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corpse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Group Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=10887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Corpse blogger Mark Howard (7/8/09) has linked to a London Guardian "story that simply must be read":
Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers has paid out more than £1m to settle legal cases that threatened to reveal evidence of his journalists' repeated involvement in the use of criminal methods to get stories.
The payments secured secrecy over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News Corpse</strong> blogger Mark Howard (<a href="http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=1328" target="_blank">7/8/09</a>) has linked to a London <strong>Guardian</strong> "<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/murdoch-papers-phone-hacking" target="_blank">story</a> that simply must be read":</p>
<blockquote><p>Rupert Murdoch’s <strong>News Group Newspapers</strong> has paid out more than £1m to settle legal cases that threatened to reveal evidence of his journalists' repeated involvement in the use of criminal methods to get stories.</p>
<p>The payments secured secrecy over out-of-court settlements in three cases that threatened to expose evidence of Murdoch journalists using private investigators who illegally hacked into the mobile phone messages of numerous public figures and to gain unlawful access to confidential personal data, including tax records, social security files, bank statements and itemised phone bills. Cabinet ministers, MPs, actors and sports stars were all targets of the private investigators.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break-->Cautioning that "the rest of the story just gets more lurid," Howard then updates with what he deems a "shocking look into the way that Murdoch and his accomplices <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/03/fox-fortifying-for-dirtiest-political-assaults-ever/">operate</a>" on this side of the Atlantic--namely, through absolutely shameless toadyism:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rupert Murdoch appeared on his own <strong>Fox Business Network</strong> today where <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/15/tea-parties-and-false-balance/">Stuart Varney</a>, who is notorious for aggressively challenging (i.e., interrupting) liberals, <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&amp;streamingFormat=FLASH&amp;referralObject=6697582&amp;referralPlaylistId=8e68cac0753d4e8bd71174d41c674e48f15e1331" target="_blank">attempted</a> to ask him a question:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Varney:</strong> The story that is really buzzing all around the country, and certainly right here in New York, is that the <strong>News of the World</strong>, a <strong>News Corporation</strong> newspaper in Britain…<br />
<strong>Murdoch:</strong> No, I'm not talking about that issue at all today.<br />
<strong>Varney:</strong> OK. No worries, Mr. Chairman. That's fine with me.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/13/no-worries-in-fox-coverage-of-murdoch-crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall St. Cheerleaders &#039;Abandon Economic Reporting&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/03/wall-st-cheerleaders-abandon-economic-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/03/wall-st-cheerleaders-abandon-economic-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=9686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at last week's "whole series of bad reports on the state of the economy," Dean Baker of Beat the Press and the Center for Economic and Policy Research tells readers of London's Guardian (6/1/09) if they think "these reports might have led to gloomy news stories," such assessments are to be found "not in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at last week's "whole <a href="http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=131207" target="_blank">series</a> of bad <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/29/manufacturing-gdp-jcrew-markets-transcript-tiffany.html" target="_blank">reports</a> on the state of the economy," Dean Baker of <strong>Beat the Press</strong> and the Center for Economic and Policy Research tells readers of London's <strong>Guardian</strong> (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jun/01/us-economy-media" target="_blank">6/1/09</a>) if they think "these reports might have led to gloomy news stories," such assessments are to be found "not in the U.S. media": "The folks who <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3646">could not see</a> an $8 trillion housing bubble are still determined to find the silver lining in even the worst economic news":</p>
<blockquote><p>For example, <strong>National Public Radio</strong> <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/beat_the_press_archive?month=05&amp;year=2009&amp;base_name=npr_says_investors_are_out_to" target="_blank">told listeners</a> that the new home sales figure reported for April was up from the March level. While this was true, the April figure was only 1,000 higher than a March level that had just been revised down by 5,000. April new home sales were 4,000 below the sales level that had originally been reported for March. <strong>USA Today</strong> <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-05-28-econ-roundup_N.htm" target="_blank">touted</a> a "surge" in durable goods orders, which was also based on a sharp downward revision to the prior month's data.</p>
<p>The media have obviously abandoned economic reporting and instead have adopted the role of cheerleader, touting whatever good news it can find and inventing good news when none can be found. This leaves the responsibility of reporting on the economy <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/category/economy/">to others</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break-->Predicting that "at some point it will be impossible to conceal the bad news, and Congress' attention will return to <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/04/media-whats-this-spending-doing-in-my-stimulus/">stimulus</a>," for now Baker notes that "media's reality defying happy talk on the economy is delaying this moment." Read the recent issue of FAIR's magazine <strong>Extra!:</strong> "Stimulus Snake Oil: Media Promote Nonsensical GOP Talking Points (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3798">3/09</a>) by Peter Hart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/03/wall-st-cheerleaders-abandon-economic-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

