<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Lanny Davis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/lanny-davis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Debate, Washington Post Style</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/22/debate-washington-post-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/22/debate-washington-post-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Schnur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Perino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Schoen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've talked about these "Topic A" debates in the Washington Post before, and today's installment is a doozy. The topic on the table is Obama's media strategy. And, as before, the important people are on the political right,
Here are the right-wingers: Karl Rove, Dan Schnur (communications director of John McCain's 2000 presidential campaign), Ed Rogers  (White [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/01/advice-for-obama-from-republicans/">talked</a> about these "Topic A" <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/01/the-washington-posts-afghanistan-debate/">debates</a> in the <strong>Washington Post</strong> <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/17/the-washington-posts-non-debate-on-afghanistan/">before</a>, and today's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/21/AR2009092102025_pf.html">installment</a> is a doozy. The topic on the table is Obama's media strategy. And, as before, the important people are on the political right,</p>
<p>Here are the right-wingers: Karl Rove, Dan Schnur (communications director of John McCain's 2000 presidential campaign), Ed Rogers  (White House staffer to Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush), Dana Perino (White House press secretary for George W. Bush),  Linda Chavez (chair  of the Center for Equal Opportunity, former member of the Reagan administration).</p>
<p>They're matched by two Democrats: pollster Douglas Schoen and Clinton adviser Lanny Davis (who's most recently been noteworthy for <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8/7/honduras">defending pro-coup forces </a>in Honduras). Apparently the best media strategy comes from the right or the mushy middle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/22/debate-washington-post-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Debate as Lobbyist&#039;s Own &#039;Business Interests&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/19/healthcare-debate-as-lobbyists-own-business-interests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/19/healthcare-debate-as-lobbyists-own-business-interests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mackey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald (8/18/09, ad-viewing required), pro-coup lobbyist and frequent news show guest Lanny Davis is merely "masquerading as a 'political analyst' and Democratic media pundit," when really he "is unmoored from any discernible political beliefs other than: 'I agree with whoever pays me.'"
Greenwald's present example is a new Politico and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <strong>Salon</strong> blogger Glenn Greenwald (<a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/18/davis/index.html" target="_blank">8/18/09</a>, ad-viewing required), <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/15/honduras" target="_blank">pro-coup</a> lobbyist and frequent news show guest Lanny Davis is merely "masquerading as a 'political analyst' and Democratic media pundit," when really he "is unmoored from any discernible political beliefs other than: 'I agree with whoever pays me.'"</p>
<p>Greenwald's present example is a new <strong>Politico</strong> and the <strong>Hill</strong> <a href="http://pundits.thehill.com/2009/08/15/the-dangerous-joining-of-the-far-right-and-far-left/" target="_blank">commentary</a> in which Davis warns of "The Dangerous Joining of the Far Right and Far Left" and declares it "time for the vast center-left and center-right of this country to speak up and call them out" because "silence is no longer acceptable by responsible liberals towards the reckless far left or by responsible conservatives towards the reckless far right.  Silence is complicity."</p>
<p>Greenwald breaks down this fraudulent balance, and Davis' true motivations for positing it:<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>As for the monsters of the Right, Davis lists "the shouters shouting down other people who wish to speak at town meetings, whacko 'birthers,' and liars inventing 'death panels' and obscenely and recklessly mentioning Adolph Hitler and Nazi symbols to scare people."  And who are the equivalents on the Left?  The people who do this:</p>
<blockquote><p>on the far left--including the most vicious posters on the so-called liberal blogosphere, threatening businesses with one or more executives who offer personal ideas for achieving national health care reform different from the Administration's or Democratic congressional leaders' versions (full disclosure: I support all of President Obama's core principles for national health care legislation, though I still have many unanswered questions); hateful e-mails, phone calls, blogs, and personal attacks, distorting alternative ideas different from the Administration's approach and attacking the motives of those airing them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Plainly, this whole rant has no <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/16/a-sudden-interest-in-amplifying-grassroots-concerns/">purpose</a> other than to argue that "the Left" is as bad as the screaming, gun-wielding right-wing townhall Limbaugh followers.</p></blockquote>
<p>So surely it's just coincidence that "some progressives, in the wake of [Whole Foods CEO John] Mackey's anti-health-care-reform <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html" target="_blank">Op-Ed</a>, organized a boycott of Whole Foods, <em>Davis' client</em>." Greenwald explains how "that's all Davis means when he complains of 'threatening businesses'": "they're harming the business interests of my paid client."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/19/healthcare-debate-as-lobbyists-own-business-interests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic Honduras PR&#039;s &#039;Amazing Job&#039; Misinforming</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/24/domestic-honduras-prs-amazing-job-misinforming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/24/domestic-honduras-prs-amazing-job-misinforming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bennett Ratcliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honduras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manuel Zelaya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Weisbrot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The L.A. Times has published a commentary from Center for Economic and Policy Research co-director Marc Weisbrot (7/23/09) furthering recent exposés on the damaging influence of U.S. lobbyists hired by unlawful regimes throughout the world.
Under a headline about "The High-Powered Hidden Support for Honduras' Coup," Weisbrot invites us to
meet Lanny Davis, Washington lawyer and lobbyist, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>L.A. Times</strong> has published a commentary from Center for Economic and Policy Research co-director Marc Weisbrot (<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-weisbrot23-2009jul23,0,7566740.story" target="_blank">7/23/09</a>) furthering recent <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3136">exposés</a> on the damaging influence of U.S. lobbyists hired by <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/20/honduras-coup-talks-presented-as-progress-in-nyt/">unlawful</a> regimes throughout the world.</p>
<p>Under a headline about "The High-Powered Hidden Support for Honduras' Coup," Weisbrot invites us to</p>
<blockquote><p>meet Lanny Davis, Washington lawyer and lobbyist, former legal counsel to President Clinton and avid campaigner for Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential bid. He has been hired by a coalition of Latin American business interests to represent the dictatorship that ousted elected President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras in a military coup and removed him to Costa Rica on June 28.</p>
<p>Davis is working with Bennett Ratcliff, another lobbyist with a close relationship to Hillary Clinton who is a former senior executive for one of the most influential political and public relations firms in Washington. <!--preview-break--> In the current mediation effort hosted by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, the coup-installed government did not make a move without first consulting Ratcliff, an unnamed source <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/world/americas/13honduras.html" target="_blank">told</a> the <strong>New York Times</strong>.</p>
<p>Davis and Ratcliff have done an <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/17/us-press-cites-pro-coup-papers-pro-coup-poll/">amazing</a> public relations job so far. Americans, relying on media reports, are likely to believe that Zelaya was ousted because he tried to use a referendum to extend his term of office. This is false.</p></blockquote>
<p>Weisbrot reminds us that "Zelaya's referendum, planned for the day the coup took place, was a <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/30/nyt-reports-honduras-opponent-opinions-from-afar/">nonbinding</a> poll," "only asked voters if they wanted to have an actual referendum on reforming the country's constitution on the November ballot," and "Zelaya would be out of office in January, no matter what steps were taken toward constitutional reform" Zelaya even "has repeatedly said that if the constitution were changed, he would not seek another term."</p>
<p>Listen to the FAIR radio program <strong>CounterSpin:</strong> "Greg Grandin on Honduras Coup" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3136">7/3/07</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/24/domestic-honduras-prs-amazing-job-misinforming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
