<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; labor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/labor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Union Voices Mean to the Wisconsin Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/28/what-union-voices-mean-to-the-wisconsin-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/28/what-union-voices-mean-to-the-wisconsin-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Face the Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meet the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Trumka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=17456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we noted here, there weren't many labor voices booked on the Sunday morning chat shows. One, actually--Richard Trumka from the AFL-CIO.
ABC's This Week featured four governors (two Democrats, two Republicans) talking about their fiscal problems. CBS's Face the Nation had a soft interview with New Jersey Republican Gov. Chris Christie. Host Bob Schieffer asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we noted <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/25/where-are-the-workers-voices/">here</a>, there weren't many labor voices booked on the Sunday morning chat shows. One, actually--Richard Trumka from the AFL-CIO.</p>
<p><strong>ABC'</strong>s <strong>This Week</strong> <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/roundtable-governors-state-states-13012386">featured</a> four governors (two Democrats, two Republicans) talking about their fiscal problems. <strong>CBS</strong>'s <strong>Face the Nation</strong> had a soft<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/FTN_022711.pdf?tag=cbsnewsTwoColUpperPromoArea"> interview</a> with New Jersey Republican Gov. Chris Christie. Host <a title="FAIR Blog: Don't Even THINK of Lying to Bob Schieffer" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/15/dont-even-think-of-lying-to-bob-schieffer/" target="_self">Bob Schieffer</a> asked him one question that began, "You have a reputation as a straight talker, I think...." Schieffer went on to play a clip of Christie <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/18/chris-christies-not-telling-the-truth-ugly-or-otherwise/">bravely calling</a> for Social Security cuts. Instead of questioning Christie's totally inaccurate premise--that you "have to raise the retirement age"--Schieffer asked him, "Should other people be saying that?"</p>
<p>Over at <strong>NBC</strong>, Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker could at least be challenged by another guest  on the same show. They weren't on at the same time, but <strong>NBC</strong> viewers <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41781178/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts">could hear</a> Trumka say this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, first of all, this isn't about the budget crisis. Let's look at how this--his arguments migrated.  First he said it was--the budget crisis was caused because workers were paid too much in Wisconsin.  We now have studies that show they're not overpaid, they're underpaid.  In fact, people with a degree in Wisconsin get 25 percent less than their private sector things. <!--preview-break--> </p>
<p>Then he said it was about the pension.  Now we find out that his pension plan, unlike a lot in the country, is almost fully funded.  The assets match the liabilities.  </p>
<p>And then the employees said, or the members out there said, his workers said, "We'll accept your cuts." And he said: "No.  We won't accept your accepting our cuts." And the most outrageous thing that he did, and he talked about this, was he's now saying to them, "You either have to accept a loss of your rights or I'm going to lay you off." Now, no person should have to face the right of their loss of their job or the loss of their rights.  I know Governor Barbour would never say to his employees, his people down there, "You either have to give up your rights or you have to give up your job."</p></blockquote>
<p>So there isn't much of a pension crisis in Wisconsin. State workers  aren't overpaid. And those same workers have agreed to many of the concessions Walker is demanding. If this were part of every discussion about Wisconsin, we'd be having a far more sensible discussion.</p>
<p><strong>NBC </strong>host <a title="FAIR Blog: David Gregory's Social Security Challenge" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/14/david-gregorys-social-security-challenge/" target="_self">David Gregory</a> followed with a popular right-wing argument about public workers' unions--that their political campaign contributions mean that elected officials owe them favors:</p>
<blockquote><p>You raise a lot of money from public employees.  That goes, goes to finance campaigns to try to get somebody in office that you can do business with.  And ultimately you're supporting someone, in some cases, that you're ultimately negotiating with.  They also know that political employees, rather, public employees are politically active because they're organized by the unions.  And so they make concessions on things like pensions, on healthcare, knowing that the promises don't come due to well down the road.  Isn't this the cycle that we've gotten into that public unions have to take some responsibility for?</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, aren't politicians doing favors for you because you help them get elected? How often have CEOs and corporate trade associations--who have <a title="Extra!: Media Don’t Bite the Ruling That Feeds Them" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4223" target="_self">far more money</a> than labor to give to politicians--been asked that kind of question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/28/what-union-voices-mean-to-the-wisconsin-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Are the Workers&#039; Voices?</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/25/where-are-the-workers-voices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/25/where-are-the-workers-voices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amanda Terkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=17430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As best I can tell, the labor battle in Wisconsin is a big story--and maybe the biggest labor story in years. But as Amanda Terkel reported at the Huffington Post, that doesn't mean you're going to see union advocates on the Sunday chat shows. Terkel noted:
A union official told the Huffington Post that when none [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As best I can tell, the labor battle in Wisconsin is a big story--and maybe the biggest labor story in years. But as Amanda Terkel <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/24/unions-sunday-shows-shutting-out_n_825773.html">reported </a>at the <strong>Huffington Post</strong>, that doesn't mean you're going to see union advocates on the Sunday chat shows. Terkel noted:</p>
<blockquote><p>A union official told the <strong>Huffington Post</strong> that when none of the Sunday shows' producers reached out to them to book a labor representative this week, several unions started to pitch the shows with affected workers and local and national leaders who they felt could discuss the protests. The official said the response from the shows was essentially "thanks, but no thanks."</p></blockquote>
<p>Terkel's original post has been updated to reflect the fact that <strong>NBC</strong>'s <strong>Meet the Press</strong> has announced that it will add Richard Trumka of the AFL-CIO to its roundtable. The show will include an array of Republicans and conservatives: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, John McCain (because how could you have a Sunday show without him?), Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.*). Liberal <strong>MSNBC </strong>host Lawrence O'Donnell will also be on hand.</p>
<p>Shutting out labor is nothing new. A FAIR survey in 1995-96 <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2822">found</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>John Sweeney and Thomas Donahue, candidates for the presidency of the AFL-CIO, were the only guests who were labor leaders. Instead of worker representatives, the shows invited the CEO of United Airlines, the CEO of Continental Airlines, a Goldman Sachs analyst, retired basketball stars and political satirists.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
Last week on <strong>ABC</strong>'s <strong>This Week</strong> the roundtable segment was titled (on the show's <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/thisweek/video/roundtable-federal-budget-battle-12959751&amp;tab=9482931&amp;section=2808950&amp;playlist=2808979">website</a>) "Roundtable: Unions vs. Tea Party." They did manage to find a Tea Party congressman (Steve Southerland), along with right-wing regular George Will and right-leaning reporter Jonathan Karl. On the other side? Democratic strategist Donna Brazile.</p>
<p>(<strong>Corrected</strong>: Emanuel is a Democrat)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/25/where-are-the-workers-voices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking News: There Is a Labor Movement. In the United States, Even!</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/23/breaking-news-there-is-a-labor-movement-in-the-united-states-even/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/23/breaking-news-there-is-a-labor-movement-in-the-united-states-even/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=17413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read this in the New York Times a few days ago (2/19/11):
The images from Wisconsin--with its protests, shutdown of some public services and missing Democratic senators, who fled the state to block a vote--evoked the Middle East more than the Midwest.
There's a labor movement in this country? And in the Midwest, even!?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this in the <strong>New York Times</strong> a few days ago (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/19/us/politics/19states.html?pagewanted=print">2/19/11</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>The images from Wisconsin--with its protests, shutdown of some public services and missing Democratic senators, who fled the state to block a vote--evoked the Middle East more than the Midwest.</p></blockquote>
<p>There's a labor movement in this country? And in the Midwest, even!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/02/23/breaking-news-there-is-a-labor-movement-in-the-united-states-even/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GE Workers Don&#039;t Know One &#039;Successful Unionized Co.&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/10/ge-workers-dont-know-one-successful-unionized-co/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/10/ge-workers-dont-know-one-successful-unionized-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborogh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Partisan blogger Nick (8/6/09) has republished a new email campaign from American Rights at Work that reviews how, "just before Bear Stearns went under, CNBC's Jim Cramer had strong advice for his Mad Money viewers: buy Bear Stearns stock, and fast!"
Of course, "then the company imploded and thousands of ordinary people saw their retirement savings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Partisan</strong> blogger Nick (<a href="http://partisan-news.blogspot.com/2009/08/jim-cramer-has-it-wrong-again.html" target="_blank">8/6/09</a>) has republished a new email campaign from American Rights at Work that reviews how, "just before Bear Stearns went under, <strong>CNBC</strong>'s Jim Cramer had strong <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/19/cnbcs-jim-cramer-still-on-air-still-wrong/">advice</a> for his <strong>Mad Money</strong> viewers: buy Bear Stearns stock, and fast!"</p>
<p>Of course, "then the company imploded and thousands of ordinary people saw their retirement savings vanish. Oops." Nick continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>Now Cramer is telling his viewers the Employee Free Choice Act will hurt the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>Cramer was wrong then, he's wrong now! But this time we know exactly what will happen if viewers listen: Millions will lose out financially.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Jim Cramer is claiming that the Employee Free Choice Act will stall the U.S. economy, even though numerous economists (including Nobel Prize winners!) and institutional investors who manage $757 billion in assets recognize that the bill is critical to rebuilding the broken economy.</p></blockquote>
<p>Discussing on <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/11/a-newsweek-story-gets-better-for-scarborough-with-a-little-help-from-a-friend/">Joe Scarborough</a>'s <strong>MSNBC</strong> show the act he calls "a 'sword of Damocles' hanging over our economy," Cramer "and other guests claimed they couldn't identify a single successful unionized company."</p>
<p>But American Rights at Work happens to know that "<strong>GE</strong> owns both <strong>MSNBC</strong> and Jim Cramer's own employer, <strong>CNBC</strong>. And guess what? <strong>GE</strong>’s employees are represented by unions"--and <strong>General Electric</strong> "earned more than $18 billion in profits in 2008!"</p>
<p><a href="http://action.americanrightsatwork.org/campaign/madmoney/3nkedkkr273k8njt?" target="_blank">Take action</a> by letting <strong>CNBC</strong> know that "Jim Cramer needs to stop parroting the talking points of the same greedy CEOs who got us into this economic crisis."</p>
<p>Also read the FAIR magazine <strong>Extra!:</strong> "For Media, 'Card Check' Promise Is One to Break: Corporate Outlets Suddenly Discover 'Workers Rights'" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3697">February 2009</a>) by Janine Jackson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/10/ge-workers-dont-know-one-successful-unionized-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

