<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Keith Olbermann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/keith-olbermann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Owners &#039;Call the Tune&#039; in Reported MSNBC-Fox Truce</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/owners-call-the-tune-in-reported-msnbc-fox-truce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/owners-call-the-tune-in-reported-msnbc-fox-truce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Stelter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former TV Newser Brian Stelter's article (New York Times, 8/7/09) about MSNBC and Fox News having "resumed their long-running feud this week after the New York Times reported that their parent companies, General Electric and the News Corporation, had struck a deal to stop each other's televised personal attacks" states that "the deal extends beyond [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former <strong>TV Newser</strong> Brian Stelter's article (<strong>New York Times</strong>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/08/business/media/08feud.html?_r=1" target="_blank">8/7/09</a>) about <strong>MSNBC</strong> and <strong>Fox News</strong> having "resumed their <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=10180">long-running</a> feud this week after the <strong>New York Times</strong> reported that their parent companies, <strong>General Electric</strong> and the <strong>News Corporation</strong>, had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/01/business/media/01feud.html" target="_blank">struck a deal</a> to stop each other's televised personal attacks" states that "the deal extends beyond the prime-time hour that Mr. Olbermann and Mr. O'Reilly occupy," reporting that "employees of daytime programs on <strong>MSNBC</strong> were specifically told by executives not to mention <strong>Fox</strong> hosts in segments critical of conservative media figures, according to two staff members."</p>
<p>While <strong>GE</strong>'s official line is that, "while both companies agreed that the tone should be more civil, no one at <strong>GE</strong> told anyone at <strong>NBC News</strong> or <strong>MSNBC</strong> how to report the news," Stelter quotes unnamed <strong>Fox</strong> employees who "said they were told in June and July not to flagrantly criticize <strong>General Electric</strong>." Stelter gives more room to <strong>Fox</strong> management denials--"We've never suppressed any stories about <strong>NBC</strong> or <strong>GE</strong>"--before getting to "some watchdog groups" pointing out how</p>
<blockquote><p>the months-long cease-fire challenged the claims that the two media companies did not interfere in their on-air content.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
The advocacy group Fairness &amp; Accuracy In Reporting asked its supporters on Friday to contact <strong>GE</strong>, urging it to renounce the agreement with <strong>Fox</strong>.</p>
<p>Jeff Cohen, the founder of the group, said the deal between the two networks’ parent companies was a reason to be wary of corporate-owned TV news.</p>
<p>"It should remind news consumers of who calls the tune and pays the bills--and that TV reporters and even loud-mouthed commentators have corporate bosses whose interests are often not about unbridled journalism," Mr. Cohen said.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Salon</strong> editor Joan Walsh weighs in too, about how "it appeared that 'the owners of two large news organizations colluded to make sure their audience got less, not more, information, and to promote their business interests, not the public interest.'"</p>
<p>Read FAIR's new Action Alert: "Did <strong>GE</strong> Stifle Keith Olbermann?: <strong>Fox</strong> and <strong>MSNBC</strong>'s Gentlemen's Agreement" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3855">8/7/09</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/owners-call-the-tune-in-reported-msnbc-fox-truce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#039;Important Historical Context&#039; of Torture Punditry</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/28/the-important-historical-context-of-torture-punditry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/28/the-important-historical-context-of-torture-punditry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hullabaloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Alter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLC memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quoting Newsweek columnist Jonathan Alter's strong words on the Keith Olbermann show about how "it's important, historically, to look at the context of" the "effort in these OLC memos to try to dress [torture] up as something else," Hullabaloo blogger digby takes issue (4/24/09) with his statement that "Dick Cheney stands almost alone" in still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting <strong>Newsweek</strong> columnist Jonathan Alter's strong words on the Keith Olbermann show about how "it's important, historically, to look at the context of" the "effort in these <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3764">OLC memos</a> to try to dress [torture] up as something else," <strong>Hullabaloo</strong> blogger digby takes issue (<a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/nobody-said-this-was-going-to-be-pretty.html" target="_blank">4/24/09</a>) with his statement that "Dick Cheney stands <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/26/bush-lie-lives-on-as-pro-torture-spin-point/">almost</a> alone" in still publicly defending the memos:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yes, Dick Cheney is forlorn and all alone. Many of the people who advocated taking the gloves off are leaving him out there hanging today. And one of them is <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=3107">Jonathan Alter</a>.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
See, he forgot to mention--and Keith apparently didn't know--that in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 this torture talk didn't come out of nowhere or even from the dark recesses of Cheney's evil mind. Jonathan Alter himself was one of the people who brought it up almost instantly: "<a href="http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/safety/torture1.htm" target="_blank">Time to Think About Torture</a>" By Jonathan Alter, <strong>Newsweek</strong>, November 5, 2001.</p>
<p>Clearly, the Pentagon wasn't alone in advocating torture from the moment 9/11 happened. It was being advocated in the pages of major newsmagazines by so-called liberal columnists who are now commenting on what "Cheney did" as if they weren't even in the country at the time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read FAIR's review of such craven commentators at the time <strong>Extra!:</strong> "Pro-Pain Pundits: Torture Advocates Defy U.S., International Law" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1097">1-2/02</a>) by Steve Rendall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/28/the-important-historical-context-of-torture-punditry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC&#039;s Pentagon Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/01/msnbcs-pentagon-pundit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/01/msnbcs-pentagon-pundit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isabel Macdonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry McCaffrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=3362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent New York Times article (11/29/08) offers fresh documentation of conflicts of interest involving one of TV's most famous retired generals, Barry McCaffrey, who continues to be employed as an NBC military analyst even as he rakes in profits from military contractors.  The story of how McCaffrey and at least 74 other retired [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent <strong>New York Times</strong> article (<a title="NYT: One Man’s Military-Industrial-Media Complex" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/washington/30general.html?_r=1&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">11/29/08</a>) offers fresh documentation of conflicts of interest involving one of TV's most famous retired generals, Barry McCaffrey, who continues to be employed as an <strong>NBC</strong> military analyst even as he rakes in profits from military contractors.  The story of how McCaffrey and at least 74 other retired generals were receiving briefings through a secret Pentagon propaganda program was broken by the <strong>New York Times</strong> back in April (<a title="NYT: Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html" target="_blank">4/20/08</a>); however, it <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3361">received scarcely a mention</a> on the TV news outlets that employed these Pentagon pundits.</p>
<p>One exception was Keith Olbermann's <strong>Countdown</strong> on <strong>MNSBC</strong> (4/21/08). However, for Olbermann, McCaffrey's short-lived stint as a skeptic of Pentagon tactics seemed to be a bigger story than the fact that McCaffrey had been participating in a Pentagon propaganda program and had a financial stake in selling war equipment. <!-- preview-break --> Olbermann stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>Buying the news-gate. First Armstrong Williams and video news releases and Jeff Gannon. Now the <strong>New York Times</strong> report yesterday that so many of the supposedly ex-military figures you were seeing on this network and <strong>CBS</strong> and <strong>ABC</strong>, <strong>CNN</strong> and <strong>Fox</strong>, in '03 and '04 and '05 still had business relationships with the Pentagon and were still being wined and dined by DOD brass.</p>
<p>The headline here is not that the administration was trying to corrupt the free press. It's, A, how courageous were the likes of Barry McCaffrey, Monty Meigs and Jack Jacobs when they came on here and said, this is crack--the Pentagon misled everybody?</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed, McCaffrey had for a time strayed from his Pentagon talking points. However, as the recent <strong>New York Times</strong> article documents, he was quickly cut off from access to the Pentagon's secret briefings as punishment, and rapidly reversed course:</p>
<blockquote><p>Robert Weiner, a longtime publicist for General McCaffrey, said the general came to see that if he continued his criticism, he risked being shut out not only by Mr. Rumsfeld but also by his network of friends and contacts among the uniformed leadership.</p>
<p>"There is a time when you have to punt," said Mr. Weiner, emphasizing that he spoke as General McCaffrey’s friend, not as his spokesman.</p>
<p>Within days General McCaffrey began to backpedal, professing his "great respect" for Mr. Rumsfeld to Tim Russert.</p></blockquote>
<p>Moreover, the <strong>Times</strong> noted that</p>
<blockquote><p>For months to come, as an insurgency took root, General McCaffrey defended the Bush administration. "I am 100 percent behind what the administration, what the president of the United States, is doing in Iraq," he told Mr. Williams that June.</p></blockquote>
<p>Even McCaffrey's own people seem to agree that his role as a TV analyst was inherently compromised, according to the <strong>Times</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Weiner, the general's longtime publicist, said General McCaffrey worked with clients "to get your mission achieved in the media." General McCaffrey, he said, often speaks out with the twin goals of shaping policy and generating favorable coverage for clients with worthy products or ideas.</p></blockquote>
<p>McCaffrey's latter allegiance to the Bush administration line was something Olbermann conveniently seemed to forget.</p>
<p>However, <strong>MSNBC</strong>'s noted liberal host did caution, the day after the <strong>New York Times</strong> exposed the Pentagon pundits program, that such journalistic improprieties might be ongoing--at least at <em>one </em>cable network: "What makes anybody think this still isn't going on at <strong>Fox</strong>?" he demanded.</p>
<p>As it turns out, McCaffrey has in recent months been cropping up as an "analyst" much closer to home. And not just on <strong>NBC</strong> (where he’s appeared seven separate times, offering his expertise everything from the Afghanistan War to the Iraq War to the Colombian hostage rescue to the "drug war" in Mexico); he's also appeared twice on <strong>MSNBC</strong>--including on the show of Olbermann's fellow liberal <strong>MSNBC</strong> host, Rachel Maddow (9/9/08).</p>
<p>But then that should come as no surprise. After all, it was on <strong>MSNBC</strong> that McCaffrey delivered his hallmark line: <span class="published-content-body">"Thank God for the Abrams Tank...and the Bradley Fighting Vehicle!" As a FAIR Action Alert <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3349">pointed out</a>, at the time of that statement,<br />
</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span class="published-content-body">unbeknownst to viewers, McCaffrey was sitting on the board of a company called IDT, which received multi-million dollar contracts related to both of those pieces of military hardware. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>Also since the <strong>Times</strong>’ broke the pentagon pundits story, <strong>CNN</strong> has run a story featuring McCaffrey as an expert (<strong>Situation Room</strong>, 8/4/08), as has <strong>PBS</strong> (<strong>NewsHour</strong>, 6/30/08).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/01/msnbcs-pentagon-pundit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
