<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Keith Olbermann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/keith-olbermann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Whitewashing the Blackout of Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/04/whitewashing-the-blackout-of-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/04/whitewashing-the-blackout-of-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Pompeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=19422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I checked out a post from the Web-based publication Capital (9/28/11) about media coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protest because CJR (9/29/11) told me it was a "smart post" that "crunched the numbers" and showed "how there really is no media blackout." I have to say I would have thought CJR would have higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked out a post from the Web-based publication <strong>Capital</strong> (<a title="Capital: The Occupy Wall Street Media Blackout Myth" href="http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2011/09/3533389/occupy-wall-street-media-blackout-myth-plenty-stories-none-them-big" target="_blank">9/28/11</a>) about media coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protest because <strong>CJR</strong> (<a title="CJR: Is Occupy Wall Street Getting Its Fair Share of Press?" href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/is_occupy_wall_street_getting.php" target="_blank">9/29/11</a>) told me it was a "smart post" that "crunched the numbers" and showed "how there really is no media blackout." I have to say I would have thought <strong>CJR</strong> would have higher standards when it came to crunching media numbers.</p>
<p><strong>Capital</strong>'s Joe Pompeo states his thesis early on:</p>
<blockquote><p>The idea that there is a media blackout has gained appeal on the left with support from Michael Moore and Keith Olbermann, who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4QUePfHFQY" target="_blank">said</a> on the September 21 edition of his primetime show on <strong>Current TV</strong>: "The majority of the media is ignoring the public uprising."</p>
<p>In  fact, an (admittedly unscientific) survey of news organizations  suggests the protest, despite lacking any clear goal or purpose (that's  by design), has been making headlines since it began on September 17.</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, so Pompeo is trying to show that Olbermann was wrong when he said on September 21 that "the majority of the media" was ignoring the protest. (Michael Moore made a similar statement on the <strong>Rachel Maddow Show</strong> on <a title="FAIR Blog: Michael Moore on Progressive Protests and Media Blackouts" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/09/21/michael-moore-on-progressive-protests-and-media-blackouts/" target="_blank">September 19</a>.) He does this by doing Nexis and <strong>Google</strong> searches that include a full week of additional coverage:</p>
<blockquote><p>A Nexis query for "Occupy Wall Street" yielded 428 results as of press time [i.e, September 28], including 248 items that appeared on blogs, 71 in newspapers, 63 on the wires, 31 in "Web-based publications," 18 as news transcripts, nine as "aggregate news sources," one in the industry trade press and one in a legal news publication. <strong>Google News</strong> has <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=bill+schulz+red+eye&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&amp;tbm=nws&amp;source=hp&amp;q=occupy+wall+street&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=occupy+wall+street&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=1&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=46045l48186l2l48254l2l2l0l0l0l0l154l154l0.1l1l0&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.&amp;fp=69954dc879471b0e&amp;biw=1348&amp;bih=586" target="_blank">indexed more than 2,000 articles between September 17 and today</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>That <em>is</em> "admittedly unscientific"--not to mention patently unfair.<!--preview-break--></p>
<p>How much coverage had Occupy Wall Street actually gotten when Olbermann made his claim? Well, Nexis gives me 17 articles from September 16 through September 21 in the "Newspaper Stories, Combined Articles" database with the words "Occupy Wall Street" in them.  Of these, 10 are from overseas papers--from Britain, Australia, Canada, China and Pakistan. Another four are from the <strong>St. Joseph News Press</strong>, a Missouri paper that reprints tiny items from <strong>CNN</strong>'s wire service. So when Olbermann made his comment, there had been <em>three</em> actual U.S. newspaper stories during five days of demonstrations in the heart of the nation's media capital--the New York <strong>Daily News</strong> (9/17/11),  <strong>Newark Star Ledger</strong> (9/18/11) and New York <strong>Newsday</strong> (9/19/11)--that are at least in-depth enough to mention the name of the event. That's a grand total of 1,047 words.</p>
<p>That <strong>Newsday</strong> piece, by the way, was headlined "Protests Close Wall Street Second Day." Nothing to see here--move along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/04/whitewashing-the-blackout-of-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olbermann: O&#039;Reilly&#039;s Hacking Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/14/olbermann-oreillys-hacking-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/14/olbermann-oreillys-hacking-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday FAIR documented that Fox host Bill O'Reilly called for the prosecution of media outlets that published Sarah Palin's hacked emails in 2008-- which might mean, if he were at all consistent, that O'Reilly wants to see his boss Rupert Murdoch do some hard time over the far more serious News Corp. hacking scandal.
FAIR's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday FAIR <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4342">documented</a> that<strong> Fox</strong> host Bill O'Reilly called for the prosecution of media outlets that published Sarah Palin's hacked emails in 2008-- which might mean, if he were at all consistent, that O'Reilly wants to see his boss Rupert Murdoch do some hard time over the far more serious <strong>News Corp.</strong> hacking scandal.</p>
<p>FAIR's research showed up on Keith Olbermann's <strong>Countdown</strong> program on <strong>Current</strong> last night-- where O'Reilly was named The Worst Person in the World. Watch it (starts at around the 2:15 mark):<br />
<object id="flashObj" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="270" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=1049970789001&amp;linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fcurrent.com%2Fshows%2Fcountdown%2Fvideo%2Fworst-persons-a-triggerhappy-politician-bachmann-and-oreilly&amp;playerID=1040141195001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAA3B3xrZk~,HJshEnrCBsRvDMbCheku3Pjss6-I6ruG&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&amp;isUI=1" /><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=1049970789001&amp;linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fcurrent.com%2Fshows%2Fcountdown%2Fvideo%2Fworst-persons-a-triggerhappy-politician-bachmann-and-oreilly&amp;playerID=1040141195001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAA3B3xrZk~,HJshEnrCBsRvDMbCheku3Pjss6-I6ruG&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="flashObj" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="270" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&amp;isUI=1" name="flashObj" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" seamlesstabbing="false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" flashvars="videoId=1049970789001&amp;linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fcurrent.com%2Fshows%2Fcountdown%2Fvideo%2Fworst-persons-a-triggerhappy-politician-bachmann-and-oreilly&amp;playerID=1040141195001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAA3B3xrZk~,HJshEnrCBsRvDMbCheku3Pjss6-I6ruG&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object><!--preview-break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/14/olbermann-oreillys-hacking-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC Misogyny</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/26/msnbc-misogyny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/26/msnbc-misogyny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC host Ed Schultz has been suspended without pay for a week for calling right-wing pundit Laura Ingraham a "right-wing slut" on his radio show. Schultz apologized on MSNBC last night, calling his words "terribly vile."
This is not a new thing at MSNBC.  In 2006, Keith Olbermann did a bit about Paris Hilton being assaulted--joking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MSNBC </strong>host <a title="FAIR Blog: The Curious Case of the CIA Whistleblower" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/03/22/libya-lockerbie-and-the-foxmsnbc-convergence/" target="_self">Ed Schultz</a> has been <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ed-schultz-suspended-for-slut-comment-directed-at-laura-ingraham_b68342">suspended without pay for a week</a> for calling right-wing pundit Laura Ingraham a "right-wing slut" on his radio show. Schultz <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0511/Ed_Schultz_apologizes_to_Laura_Ingraham.html">apologized</a> on <strong>MSNBC</strong> last night, calling his words "terribly vile."</p>
<p>This is not a new thing at <strong>MSNBC</strong>.  In 2006, <a title="Extra!: Olbermann's Countdown Reaches Zero" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4263" target="_self">Keith Olbermann</a> did <a title="Meda Bistro: Olbermann: Paris Hilton’s ‘Had Worse Things Happen To Her Face’ Than Being Punched" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/olbermann-paris-hiltons-had-worse-things-happen-to-her-face-than-being-punched_b3461" target="_blank">a bit</a> about Paris Hilton being assaulted--joking that she has "had worse things happen to her face."  The on-screen graphic was "A Slut and Battery." In 2009 he <a title="AlterNet: http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/143640/why_we_shouldn%27t_call_women_conservatives_%27whores%27" href="http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/143640/why_we_shouldn%27t_call_women_conservatives_%27whores%27" target="_blank">called</a> right-wing pundit Michelle Malkin a "big mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it."<!--preview-break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/26/msnbc-misogyny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Did Olbermann Really Leave MSNBC?</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/19/why-did-keith-olbermann-leave-msnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/19/why-did-keith-olbermann-leave-msnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 20:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann popped up on the David Letterman show and gave one reason--perhaps one big reason--why he left MSNBC. As transcribed by MediaBistro's TVNewser (where you can also watch the video):
At some point in the last few years that I have been doing the news in the way that I do, it has occurred to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Olbermann popped up on the <strong>David Letterman</strong> show and gave one reason--perhaps one <em>big</em> reason--why he left <strong>MSNBC</strong>. As transcribed by MediaBistro's <strong>TVNewser</strong> (where you can also watch the <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/keith-olbermann-appears-on-the-late-show-tells-david-letterman-why-he-left-msnbc_b67186#more-67186">video</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>At some point in the last few years that I have been doing the news in the way that I do, it has occurred to me that the best place to continue doing the news in that way would be to do it at a place that is just in the news business and nothing else. <!--preview-break--> It doesn't also own an amusement park in Orlando, it doesn't have outdoor advertising, or beet plantations in the Azores.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/19/why-did-keith-olbermann-leave-msnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

