<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Glenn Beck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/glenn-beck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fox News Goes to the Middle (and Other Fantasies)</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/12/06/fox-news-goes-to-the-middle-and-other-fantasies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/12/06/fox-news-goes-to-the-middle-and-other-fantasies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Sherman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rutenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=19889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Fox News Channel going soft? In an election year? Some media figures seem to think the hard-right channel is going to the "middle," but this seems to be a figment of the centrist imagination.
New York magazine's Gabriel Sherman has a short piece trying to make this case. His first bit of evidence is that  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <strong>Fox News Channel</strong> going soft? In an <em>election year</em>? Some media figures seem to think the hard-right channel is going to the "middle," but this seems to be a figment of the centrist imagination.</p>
<p><strong>New York </strong>magazine's <a title="FAIR Blog: MSNBC Does Not--and Never Can--Play the Same Game as Fox" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/10/04/msnbc-does-not-and-never-can-play-the-same-game-as-fox/" target="_self">Gabriel Sherman</a> has a <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/fox-news-candidate-is-fox-news.html">short piece</a> trying to make this case. His first bit of evidence is that  <strong>Fox</strong> granted backstage access at its recent Republican debate to a <strong>New York Times</strong> reporter--as Sherman put it, "<strong>Fox</strong>'s decision to allow <strong>Times</strong> scribe <a title="FAIR Blog: False Balance, TV Critic Style" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/02/false-balance-tv-critic-style/" target="_self">Jim Rutenberg</a> into the building to  confront the candidates in person." That sounds rather <em>aggressive,</em> and Sherman sees this as some sort of political shift:</p>
<div>
<blockquote><p>If 2010 was the year that <strong>Fox</strong> fueled the tea party--culminating in record  ratings and the Republican sweep of the House midterms--2012 is shaping up to  be the year that [<strong>Fox</strong> <strong>News</strong> president <a title="FAIR Blog: Behind the Scenes at Fox Is Like in Front of the Scenes" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/24/behind-the-scenes-at-fox-is-like-in-front-of-the-scenes/" target="_self">Roger] Ailes</a> decided <strong>Fox</strong> will benefit if the political world  recognizes that his network is willing to make GOP candidates sweat in front of  their base. Like any good candidate, the network plans to tack toward the center  for the general election.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That "sweating" session was a debate moderated by three Republican attorneys general, who are in some ways to the right of some of the candidates--particularly Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich. Given that the conservative base of the Republican party seems to have questions about the ideological commitment of these two--especially Romney--the fact that <strong>Fox</strong> convened a debate where the candidates had to field questions from the right doesn't really seem like playing to the "center." <!--preview-break--></p>
<p>Sherman argues:</p>
<div>
<blockquote><p>Conversations with <strong>Fox</strong> sources and  media executives suggest a new strategy: <strong>Fox</strong> is trying to credibly capture the  center without alienating its loyal core of rabid viewers. To this end, the  network is flexing its news-gathering muscles in high-profile ways that will  capture media attention.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Fox</strong> has "news-gathering muscles"? Now <em>this</em> is news.</p>
<p>As Sherman points out in the piece, he's not the first to make this <strong>Fox</strong>-t0-the-middle argument. That was <strong>Newsweek/Daily Beast</strong>'s <a title="FAIR Blog: Howard Kurtz Defends His Defense of Fox in Sherrod Debacle" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/08/04/howard-kurtz-defends-his-defense-of-fox-in-sherrod-debacle/" target="_self">Howard Kurtz</a>, who <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/09/25/roger-ailes-repositions-fox-news.print.html">back in September</a> tried to make a similar argument, based on interviews with <strong>Fox</strong> head Roger Ailes. Kurtz suggested that Ailes was "quietly repositioning America's dominant cable-news channel"--specifically by hosting a debate where one could see</p>
<blockquote><p>his anchors grilling the Republican contenders, which pleases the White House but cuts sharply against the network's conservative image--and risks alienating its most rabid right-wing fans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, this doesn't quite add up--especially if one interprets the "grilling" to be of the right-wing base, red meat variety. Which seemed to be part of what was happening, according to Kurtz's piece:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hours before last week's presidential debate in Orlando, Ailes' anchors sat in a cavernous back room, hunched over laptops, and plotted how to trap the candidates. Chris Wallace said he would aim squarely at <a title="FAIR Blog: Maybe Not Misunderestimated After All" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/11/10/maybe-not-misunderestimated-after-all/" target="_self">Rick Perry</a>'s weakness: "How do you feel about being criticized by some of your rivals as being too soft on illegal immigration? Then I go to <a title="Definition of &quot;Santorum&quot;" href="http://spreadingsantorum.com/" target="_self">Rick Santorum</a>: Is Perry too soft?"</p></blockquote>
<p>So pushing a right-wing position on immigration is going to the middle?</p>
<p>About the only real evidence of any ideological shift is the absence of <a title="FAIR Blog: For Beck, Norway Shooter Wasn't Right-Wing--Though His Victims Were 'Hitler Youth'" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/26/for-beck-norway-shooter-wasnt-right-wing-though-his-victims-were-hitler-youth/" target="_self">Glenn Beck</a> from <strong>Fox</strong>'s line-up. One could argue that this is a shift to the middle, but if anything it's a reminder that Beck's program dealt in a <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4052">conspiratorial brand of conservatism</a> that was not so much to the right as it was off in the 4th dimension from <strong>Fox </strong>mainstays like Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly. Without Beck, <strong>Fox</strong> is back to its normally arch-conservative self.</p>
<p>Kurtz also caught this bit:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ailes raises a <strong>Fox</strong> initiative that he cooked up: "Are our producers on board on this 'Regulation Nation' stuff? Are they ginned up and ready to go?" Ailes, who claims to be "hands off" in developing the series, later boasts that "no other network will cover that subject .... I think regulations are totally out of control," he adds, with bureaucrats hiring Ph.D.s to "sit in the basement and draw up regulations to try to ruin your life." It is a message his troops cannot miss.</p></blockquote>
<p>Those must be <strong>Fox</strong>'s news-gathering muscles in action--going after an anti-White House, anti-regulation storyline popular with conservatives... and at <a href="http://www.grist.org/politics/2011-11-28-obama-administration-politicizes-regulatory-process">odds with reality</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/12/06/fox-news-goes-to-the-middle-and-other-fantasies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox Coverage of OWS: Now Even Beckier!</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/17/fox-coverage-of-ows-now-even-beckier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/17/fox-coverage-of-ows-now-even-beckier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldo Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tides Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=19523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox's coverage of the Occupy Wall Street movement has often looked and sounded like Glenn Beck were still working there.
On Friday's broadcast of the O'Reilly Factor (10/14/11), Beck was there to show how wild conspiracy-mongering is done:

O'REILLY: What's the George Soros factor here?
BECK: George Soros is connected with this through the Tides Foundation. The Tides [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fox</strong>'s coverage of the Occupy Wall Street movement <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/07/is-glenn-beck-back-at-fox-news-channel/">has often</a> looked and sounded like <a title="Extra!: Glenn Beck Gets Progressively More Paranoid" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4052" target="_self">Glenn Beck</a> were still working there.</p>
<p>On Friday's broadcast of the <strong>O'Reilly Factor</strong> (10/14/11), Beck was there to show how wild conspiracy-mongering is done:<!--preview-break--></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/beck-oreilly.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="263" /></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> What's the <a title="FAIR Blog: Glenn Beck's Jewish Problem" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/11/15/glenn-becks-jewish-problem/" target="_self">George Soros</a> factor here?</p>
<p><strong>BECK:</strong> George Soros is connected with this through the <a title="FAIR Blog: Glenn Beck Shares a Tides Foundation Obsession With Alleged Mass Murder Plotter" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/22/glenn-beck-shares-a-tides-foundation-obsession-with-alleged-mass-murder-plotter/" target="_self">Tides Foundation</a>. The Tides Foundation, his Open Society and <a title="FAIR Blog: Glenn Beck's Dangerous Obsession With Frances Fox Piven" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/01/20/glenn-becks-dangerous-obsession-with-frances-fox-piven/" target="_self">Code Pink</a> are involved in what is called the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong>... <strong>Occupied Wall Street Journal</strong>. And it is a--it's a full color newspaper.</p>
<p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> Right.</p>
<p><strong>BECK: </strong>You know what it costs to print a newspaper.</p>
<p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> <a title="Mashable: Occupy Wall Street Newspaper Raises $54,000 on Kickstarter" href="http://mashable.com/2011/10/07/occupy-wall-street-newspaper-raises-54000-on-kickstarter/" target="_blank">Somebody</a> is behind that.</p>
<p><strong>BECK:</strong> Huge money. Huge money.</p>
<p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> Right, and what's the editorial bent of the newspaper?</p>
<p><strong>BECK:</strong> Revolution.</p>
<p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> OK, overthrow?</p>
<p><strong>BECK:</strong> Yes, I mean, you know, collapse the system.</p></blockquote>
<p>Beck manages to names names. SEIU and the Working Families Party are involved in what is obviously a global Marxist revolution. (Some of the evidence has been erased from Craigslist, but Beck has it.)</p>
<p>And, Beck warns, it goes all the way to the White House. Barack Obama is a "street organizer.... He knows everything that's going on, he knows all the people that are involved." Beck went on to predict that there will be violence, and that <a title="Extra!: Van Jones Is Happening and You Don’t Know Who He Is" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3995" target="_self">Van Jones</a> will emerge to reap the benefits.</p>
<p>To be fair, O'Reilly offered another take, one more sympathetic to the protests. That came courtesy of <a title="Extra!: Fox at the Front" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1096" target="_self">Geraldo Rivera</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/17/fox-coverage-of-ows-now-even-beckier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Glenn Beck Back at Fox News Channel?</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/07/is-glenn-beck-back-at-fox-news-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/07/is-glenn-beck-back-at-fox-news-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveOn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=19452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounded like it, but it was just Bill O'Reilly channeling Beck's Soros/MoveOn/Big Labor paranoia, minus the chalkboard:
On Wednesday in New York City, there was another far-left demonstration as a bunch of people marched on Wall Street. Why? We aren't exactly sure.
What we do know is that these folks are zealots who are being organized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounded like it, but it was just Bill O'Reilly <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2011/10/06/bill-oreillytaking-it-streets#ixzz1a131sU8k">channeling</a> Beck's Soros/MoveOn/Big Labor paranoia, minus the chalkboard:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Wednesday in New York City, there was another far-left demonstration as a bunch of people marched on Wall Street. Why? We aren't exactly sure.</p>
<p>What we do know is that these folks are zealots who are being organized by some very interesting people. Does the name MoveOn.org mean anything to you? How about George Soros? Well, for the first time, MoveOn, funded in part by Soros, has openly allied itself with the protesters.</p>
<p>In addition, we have some unions in the mix: the United Auto Workers, the United Federation of Teachers and, of course, the always reliable SEIU. Of course, not all workers in those unions support bringing down capitalism. They don't. But their leadership is certainly sympathetic to the demonstrators.</p>
<p>But, again, what do these people want?</p>
<p>The common thread seems to be "income equality." Groups like the Working Families Party and the Strong Economy for All Coalition are basically socialistic outfits. They want the government to take money away from the affluent and give it to them, a nice deal if you can get it. And you can get it in places like Cuba and Zimbabwe.<!--preview-break--></p>
<p>The big money behind these protesters, Soros, he doesn't want socialism. Soros is the biggest capitalist on the planet. He wants power and these groups are using the far-left zealots to try to achieve that.</p></blockquote>
<p>In case your tinfoil hat is not getting good reception, O'Reilly's point is that MoveOn <a title="MoveOn.org" href="http://front.moveon.org/stand-up-rise-up-occupy-wall-street-oct-5/" target="_blank">endorsed</a> Occupy Wall Street two weeks after it started, and George Soros <a title="Odd Time Signatures: Orrin Hatch, MoveOn, and George Soros" href="http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/10/19/orrin-hatch-moveon-and-george-soros-the-truth/" target="_blank">contributed</a> to MoveOn in 2003-04, and therefore Soros is "the big money behind these protesters."</p>
<p>Maybe the chalkboard would help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/10/07/is-glenn-beck-back-at-fox-news-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Beck, Norway Shooter Wasn&#039;t Right-Wing--Though His Victims Were &#039;Hitler Youth&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/26/for-beck-norway-shooter-wasnt-right-wing-though-his-victims-were-hitler-youth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/26/for-beck-norway-shooter-wasnt-right-wing-though-his-victims-were-hitler-youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Behring Breivik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tides Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Beck (7/25/11, via Mediaite, 7/25/11) explains on his radio show why the right-wing Norway terror suspect is what we call left-wing here in America:
This was one of the episodes where I showed the railroad tracks that were different than America. In America, the left railroad track is gigantic government--it could be Communist or Fascist, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Beck (7/25/11, via <strong>Mediaite</strong>, <a title="Mediaite: Too Soon: Glenn Beck Compares Attacked Norway Camp To ‘Hitler Youth’" href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/too-soon-glenn-beck-compares-attacked-norway-camp-to-%E2%80%98hitler-youth%E2%80%99/" target="_blank">7/25/11</a>) explains on his radio show why the right-wing Norway terror suspect is what we call <em>left</em>-wing here in America:</p>
<blockquote><p>This was one of the episodes where I showed the railroad tracks that were different than America. In America, the left railroad track is gigantic government--it could be Communist or Fascist, it doesn’t matter, it's giant government. The other side of the track is anarchy or very, very small government. So that's the left and right here in America. The Left and Right in Europe, because, once they got rid of the kings, they didn’t get "We the People," they had to replace it with another strong government. And that's where Fascism and Communism came from. That’s your left and right. Fascism on the right; Nazis. And Communism on the left. And there are variations on both of those theories, Fascism and Communism, left and right. This guy, the shooter, is from the right-wing, different than our right-wing. It is still big government.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just to give an example of how Anders Behring Breivik's politics are not completely different from right-wing politics in the United States, in the same radio broadcast, Beck shared his feelings about the victims of the Norwegian shooting spree:</p>
<blockquote><p>As the thing started to unfold and there was a shooting at a political camp, which sounds a little like the Hitler Youth. Who does a camp for kids that's all about politics? Disturbing.</p></blockquote>
<p>So the kids who were massacred in Norway were kind of like Hitler Youth. Which is to say they were kind of going to grow up, take over the world, impose a totalitarian dictatorship and commit genocide. What's the rational thing to do with people like that, if no one else is going to stop them?<!--preview-break--></p>
<p>This is a fairly standard argument for <a title="Extra!: Glenn Beck Gets Progressively More Paranoid" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4052" target="_self">Beck</a>, with the steps one should take to stop the <a title="Extra!: Playing the Nazi Card" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4022" target="_self">Nazi-like menace</a> usually left unspecified. For example, he repeatedly portrayed the <a title="FAIR Blog: Glenn Beck Shares a Tides Foundation Obsession With Alleged Mass Murder Plotter" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/22/glenn-beck-shares-a-tides-foundation-obsession-with-alleged-mass-murder-plotter/" target="_self">Tides Foundation</a>, a fairly obscure funding group, as the secret organization "behind it all...involved in the nasty of the nastiest" (<a title="Glenn Beck: Taking Action on ACORN" href="http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/31012/" target="_self">9/29/09</a>). On his <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,596703,00.html">July 13</a>, 2010 show, he presented Tides as being behind a plot to "kill white babies"--suggesting that it might soon be too late to stop it.</p>
<p>And  a few days later, on July 17, <a title="Media Matters: &quot;Progressive Hunter&quot;" href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201010110002" target="_blank">Glenn Beck fan</a> Byron Williams set out with his arsenal to try to wipe out the Tides Foundation staff, much as Breivik went to exterminate the "Hitler Youth" summer campers. Unlike Breivik, Williams didn't make it to his target; he was arrested after a shoot-out with police instead.</p>
<p>No doubt Williams, in Beck's mind, isn't a real right-winger either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/26/for-beck-norway-shooter-wasnt-right-wing-though-his-victims-were-hitler-youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

