<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Gene Weingarten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/gene-weingarten/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Immune-From-Criticismism at the Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/28/immune-from-criticismism-at-the-washington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/28/immune-from-criticismism-at-the-washington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Froomkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Weingarten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=10281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his evaluation of the Dan Froomkin firing, Washington Post ombud Andy Alexander (6/26/09) confidently asserts that "first, it's not about ideology," then later asserts that Froomkin "was urged not to do media criticism." Clearly, though, the notion that the Post should not be subjected to criticism is a central tenet of the paper's ideology.
Alexander [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his evaluation of the <a title="FAIR Blog: Dan Froomkin's Column Never Liked " href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/20/froomkins-column-never-liked-it-contains-opinion/">Dan Froomkin firing</a>, <strong>Washington Post</strong> ombud Andy Alexander (<a title="WaPo: Froomkin Departs, Leaving Angry Loyalists And Questions" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ombudsman-blog/2009/06/froomkin_departs_leaving_angry.html" target="_blank">6/26/09</a>) confidently asserts that "first, it's not about ideology," then later asserts that Froomkin "was urged not to do media criticism." Clearly, though, the notion that the <strong>Post</strong> <a title="Activism Update: Letter-writing campaign called &quot;group-thinking&quot;" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1696" target="_self">should not</a> be subjected to <a title="Action Alert: Ignoring Inaccuracy at the Washington Post" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2876" target="_self">criticism</a> is a central tenet of the paper's ideology.</p>
<p>Alexander quoted with a straight face <strong>Post</strong> columnist Gene Weingarten questioning whether Froomkin "was as informed and qualified to opine as people who had been actively covering the White House for years." Alexander did not point out that Weingarten writes a humor column, which might have helped readers put into context an otherwise inexplicable claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/28/immune-from-criticismism-at-the-washington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

