<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Gawker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WSJ &#039;Scumbag&#039; Columnist Gets Predictably Slimy</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/28/wsj-scumbag-columnist-gets-predictably-slimy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/28/wsj-scumbag-columnist-gets-predictably-slimy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burson-Marsteller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia Trade Pact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noticing that Democratic strategist Mark Penn "is the Wall Street Journal's 'Microtrend'-spotting columnist" and "also CEO of PR giant Burson-Marsteller," Gawker blogger Hamilton Nolan (8/26/09) posits that "only a scumbag would abuse the former to drum up business for the latter."
Alas, "Scumbag spotted!" is Nolan's cry when writing that
Penn's latest (old, and none too insightful) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noticing that Democratic strategist Mark Penn "is the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong>'s 'Microtrend'-spotting <a href="http://gawker.com/5107649/mark-penn-has-a-well+compensated-newspaper-job-still-no-justice-in-universe" target="_blank">columnist</a>" and "also CEO of PR giant <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xVsYc-y7IY" target="_blank">Burson-Marsteller</a>," <strong>Gawker</strong> blogger Hamilton Nolan (<a href="http://gawker.com/5346078/leak-how-mark-penn-converts-his-wsj-column-into-pr-clients" target="_blank">8/26/09</a>) posits that "only a scumbag would abuse the former to drum up business for the latter."</p>
<p>Alas, "Scumbag spotted!" is Nolan's cry when writing that</p>
<blockquote><p>Penn's latest (<a href="http://travel.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/travel/14green-1.html" target="_blank">old</a>, and none too insightful) "Microtrend" column is about "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125088561476349971.html" target="_blank">glamping</a>"--glamorous camping. It ran last weekend. By Monday, according to an internal <a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/08/500x_custom_1251308332730_pennemail.jpg" target="_blank">email</a> obtained by <strong>Gawker</strong>, Burson was already trying to recruit companies from the industry featured in the column as clients.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
Nolan goes on to remind us that "Penn was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/us/politics/07hillary.html?_r=2&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">canned</a> as Hillary Clinton's campaign strategist after it emerged that his firm was trying to get a contract to do PR work for the nation of <a title="Extra!: Human Rights Coverage Serving Washington’s Needs" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3699" target="_self">Colombia</a>—work that went against Clinton's own <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3580">political position</a>." It's particularly interesting to recall that scandal as "a story that the <strong>WSJ</strong> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120726769569388303.html" target="_blank">broke</a>," considering how, as Nolan puts it, "moonlighting from his PR career has already screwed a politician," but "now he's screwing a newspaper the same way."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/28/wsj-scumbag-columnist-gets-predictably-slimy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox &#039;News&#039; Elevates Pandering to Plain Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/24/fox-news-elevates-pandering-to-plain-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/24/fox-news-elevates-pandering-to-plain-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Cajun Boy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=10176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker blogger The Cajun Boy (6/24/09) is agog at "How Fox News Educates Its Viewers":
Last night Glenn Beck made crude drawings on a chalkboard, and tonight he and Bill O'Reilly used Barbie dolls to explain ACORN.
In the course of explaining how Nancy Pelosi is trying to stop noble Republicans from stopping ACORN from destroying America, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gawker</strong> blogger The Cajun Boy (<a href="http://gawker.com/5301893/how-fox-news-educates-its-viewers" target="_blank">6/24/09</a>) is agog at "How <strong>Fox News</strong> Educates Its Viewers":</p>
<blockquote><p>Last night Glenn Beck made crude drawings on a chalkboard, and tonight he and Bill O'Reilly used Barbie dolls to explain ACORN.</p>
<p>In the course of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3QWF1bZc3M" target="_blank">explaining</a> how Nancy Pelosi is trying to stop noble Republicans from stopping ACORN from destroying America, Beck reached under the table and pulled out a Barbie kit. Now, we watched this demonstration twice and actually don't get what Beck is trying to convey, <!--preview-break--> so either we're stupider than even the basest <strong>Fox</strong> viewer or our elitists brains just can't process anything that comes spewing from the mouths of these clowns. Maybe you'll have better luck.</p></blockquote>
<p>While Beck's demonstration really doesn't make any sense in itself, another reason for the confusion generated is surely that his and O'Reilly's whole take on ACORN is nonsensical in its entirety; see the FAIR publication <strong>Extra! Update:</strong> "CNN, Fox Hype ACORN Threat" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3675">12/08</a>) by Daniel Ward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/24/fox-news-elevates-pandering-to-plain-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Newsweek Story Gets &#039;Better&#039; for Scarborough--With a Little Help From a Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/11/a-newsweek-story-gets-better-for-scarborough-with-a-little-help-from-a-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/11/a-newsweek-story-gets-better-for-scarborough-with-a-little-help-from-a-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Tiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Meacham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=9775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The website Gawker (6/9/09) caught Newsweek making some sneaky changes in an online article--changes that were ordered by Newsweek editor Jon Meacham, and which just happened to favor the host of a show that Meacham appears on regularly.
On the afternoon of Friday, June 5, Newsweek's website put up an interview with Joe Scarborough, the conservative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website <strong>Gawker</strong> (<a title="Gawker: Joe Scarborough's 'Team' Asks for, Receives Special Treatment From Newsweek" href="http://gawker.com/5284507/joe-scarboroughs-team-asks-for-receives-special-treatment-from-newsweek" target="_blank">6/9/09</a>) caught <strong>Newsweek</strong> making some sneaky changes in an online article--changes that were ordered by <strong>Newsweek</strong> editor Jon Meacham, and which just happened to favor the host of a show that Meacham appears on regularly.</p>
<p>On the afternoon of Friday, June 5, <strong>Newsweek</strong>'s website put up an <a title="Newsweek: Can Republicans Survive?" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/200691/page/1" target="_blank">interview with Joe Scarborough</a>, the conservative host of <strong>MSNBC</strong>'s <strong>Morning Joe</strong> program.  The introduction pointed out that Scarborough had once been the <a title="Gawker: Joe Scarborough Once Defended the Murderer of an Abortion Doctor" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/200691/page/1" target="_blank">defense attorney</a> for an anti-abortion terrorist who murdered a doctor, and noted that the host had been <a title="Village Voice: Why Don't MSNBCers Question &quot;Morning Joe&quot; About Abortion Doc Killings?" href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/06/keith_olbermann_1.php" target="_blank">criticized</a> for giving insufficient attention to the murder of Dr. George Tiller, which occurred less than a week before the interview appeared.</p>
<p>By Friday night, though, the introduction to the interview had been completely rewritten.  Gone was any reference in the lead to abortion shootings, replaced instead by rather bland observations about "the rise of partisan media outlets" and "how conservatives lost their way."  What happened?  Jon Meacham happened, that's what. The <strong>Newsweek</strong> editor, a frequent guest on <strong>Morning Joe</strong>, told <strong>Gawker</strong> he was contacted about the interview by "a member of Scarborough's team," and after looking at the item he decided that "it was better to include that material in the flow of the interview."</p>
<p>Journalists don't usually think it's "better" to make the lead of a story less newsworthy by taking out references to current events.  But then newsworthiness might not be the first thing you think of when you're editing a story about your friend--especially a friend who routinely gives you valuable national TV exposure.  Which is why the better thing to do would have been for Meacham to tell the member of Scarborough's team that he couldn't second-guess the Web editor's decision-making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/11/a-newsweek-story-gets-better-for-scarborough-with-a-little-help-from-a-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

