<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Free Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/free-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Way Cleared for More &#039;Excessive Media Consolidation&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/29/way-cleared-for-more-excessive-media-consolidation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/29/way-cleared-for-more-excessive-media-consolidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On news that "today, a federal court threw out the Federal Communications Commission's rule to cap cable ownership at 30 percent," Free Press (8/28/09) comments "the rule served as an important consumer protection from media consolidation and growing cable cartels, and encouraged diversity in ownership in the cable industry."
The media advocacy group's Ben Scott further [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On news that "today, a federal court threw out the Federal Communications Commission's rule to cap cable ownership at 30 percent," Free Press (<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/72229" target="_blank">8/28/09</a>) comments "the rule served as an important consumer protection from media consolidation and growing cable cartels, and encouraged diversity in ownership in the cable industry."</p>
<p>The media advocacy group's <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/19/on-atts-arbitrary-intervention-in-the-open-internet/">Ben Scott</a> further calls it</p>
<blockquote><p>regrettable that the court tossed out an important public interest protection against excessive media consolidation. Congressional intent in the Cable Act of 1992 is very clear--the goals of federal policy in the cable industry are to promote competition, consumer choice and a diversity of programming. And yet today we have a cable cartel--the video industry is <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/20/indy-filmers-create-most-jobs-own-least-content/">dominated</a> by only a handful of large cable operators and studios.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Today consumers experience perpetual price hikes by large operators that already have market dominating purchasing power to decide <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/19/only-english-gaza-news-shut-out-of-us-cable/">the fate</a> of new channels. The promises of lower prices through competition from satellite and telecom companies in the video business have never been realized.</p></blockquote>
<p>While today "the court ruled the FCC's action as 'arbitrary and capricious,'" Free Press reminds us of how "the same court threw out the rule <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1082">in 2001</a>, but it was reinstated by the FCC in 2008 due to fears of <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3423">growing</a> market power of big cable companies."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/29/way-cleared-for-more-excessive-media-consolidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecoms&#039; &#039;Fake Grassroots&#039; Push Net Misinformation</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/24/telecoms-fake-grassroots-push-net-misinformation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/24/telecoms-fake-grassroots-push-net-misinformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astroturf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreedomWorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartland Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetCompetition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Karr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diligent media reformers Free Press (8/19/09) have announced a nifty new "online interactive tool to expose phony grassroots groups hired by big phone and cable companies to advance their political agenda." They're talking about "'astroturf' organizations--many of which also work for the health insurance, energy and tobacco industries"-- that "are mobilizing to spread misinformation about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diligent media reformers Free Press (<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/71850" target="_blank">8/19/09</a>) have announced a nifty new "online interactive tool to expose phony grassroots groups hired by big phone and cable companies to advance their political agenda." They're talking about "'<a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/05/greg-mitchell-on-foxs-grassrootsy-astroturf/">astroturf</a>' organizations--many of which also work for the health insurance, energy and tobacco industries"-- that "are mobilizing to spread misinformation about Network Neutrality and Internet policies."</p>
<p>The group's graphic <a href="http://www.freepress.net/astroturf" target="_blank">presentation</a> "tracks the huge amounts of money that phone and cable companies spend on lobbyists and campaign contributions" and</p>
<blockquote><p>reveals the contradictory and dishonest claims about Net Neutrality and other issues from top industry executives; and it puts a spotlight on the deceptive activities of groups like FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity, NetCompetition and the Heartland Institute.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
"The fake grassroots groups are spending major resources to deceive the public and promote agendas of the corporations that sign their paychecks," said Timothy Karr, campaign director of Free Press. "We need transparency, accountability and honest debate. The crucial policy decisions being made right now about the future of the Internet must be based on independent research, reliable data and facts. The phone and cable companies <a href="https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=345" target="_blank">must stop</a> distorting the issues and hiding behind their astroturf groups, sock puppets and hired shills."</p>
<p>Along with exposing astroturf groups, the interactive tool features "The Money Trail," which tabulates spending by big phone and cable on an <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/16/telecoms-rally-against-transformative-internet-bill/">army of lobbyists</a> to push their agenda in Washington.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some disturbing totals from the past two years: "<strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/23/a-new-challenge-to-net-neutrality/">Comcast</a></strong> spent more than $45 million on campaigns and lobbying," which otherwise "could have provided one year of broadband service to 150,000 households"; and <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/20/activists-beat-back-tiered-internet-scheme/">Time Warner Cable</a></strong> spent $24 million on lobbying, instead of potentially having "subsidized 100,000 low-income households for one year of broadband service."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/24/telecoms-fake-grassroots-push-net-misinformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Bill to Keep Internet Open, Discrimination-Free</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/05/new-bill-to-keep-internet-open-discrimination-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/05/new-bill-to-keep-internet-open-discrimination-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.R.3458]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free Press's newest release (7/31/09) touts some fresh congressional legislation that "Would Protect Net Neutrality Once and for All." According to the media reform activists, the Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009 "would protect Network Neutrality under the Communications Act, safeguarding the future of the open Internet and protecting Internet users from discrimination online."

Policy director [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free Press's newest release (<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/71192" target="_blank">7/31/09</a>) touts some fresh congressional legislation that "Would Protect Net Neutrality Once and for All." According to the media reform activists, the <a title="PDF" href="http://www.freepress.net/files/H.R.3458-7-31-09.pdf" target="_blank">Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009</a> "would protect Network Neutrality under the Communications Act, safeguarding the future of the open Internet and protecting Internet users from discrimination online."<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Policy director Ben Scott explains how</p>
<blockquote><p>the future of the Internet as we know it depends on maintaining freedom and openness online. This crucial legislation will help to ensure that the public--not big phone and cable companies--controls the fate of the Internet.</p>
<p>The rules that govern the Internet must protect economic innovation, democratic participation and free speech online. If we don't make Net Neutrality the law once and for all, we could see the innovation and promise of the Internet derailed forever.</p></blockquote>
<p>While warning that "an <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/16/telecoms-rally-against-transformative-internet-bill/">army of lobbyists</a> has been unleashed by the phone and cable companies to kill Net Neutrality so they can become the Internet's gatekeepers," Scott maintains that "the momentum is shifting in the public's favor," with "popular support...growing every day"--as evidenced by the fact that "millions have already <a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/add/nbb-fcc-comment" target="_blank">called on</a> our lawmakers to take action."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/05/new-bill-to-keep-internet-open-discrimination-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecoms Rally Against &#039;Transformative&#039; Internet Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/16/telecoms-rally-against-transformative-internet-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/16/telecoms-rally-against-transformative-internet-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misty Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free Press campaign coordinator Misty Perez has sent out (7/15/09) a call to action in light of the astonishing figure that "in the first three months of 2009, the phone and cable industries spent at least $20 million to hire more than 400 lobbyists" in an effort to "push for policies that fatten phone and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free Press campaign coordinator Misty Perez has sent out (<a href="http://free.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?em_id=25321.4" target="_blank">7/15/09</a>) a call to action in light of the astonishing figure that "in the first three months of 2009, the phone and cable industries spent at least $20 million to hire more than 400 lobbyists" in an effort to "push for policies that fatten phone and cable profits while leaving us with an Internet that is too expensive and too slow." Why their sense of urgency?:</p>
<blockquote><p>Right now, the FCC is crafting a national broadband plan that could fix our national broadband problem. FCC Commissioner Michael Copps <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09109/963702-96.stm" target="_blank">called</a> this plan "the most formative--indeed, transformative--proceeding ever in the Commission's history."</p>
<p>We desperately need it. Without such a plan, America has dropped to 22nd place in the world in broadband penetration, with approximately 40 percent of the country still not connected to high-speed Internet services.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
If the lobbyists have their way, America will continue to fall further and further behind the rest of the world.</p>
<p>But if we get our way, we can reinvigorate the economy, open up public participation in government, <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/12/saving-the-news-and-democracy/">empower</a> a new generation of journalists, and give everyone the opportunity to prosper in the 21st century.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perez links to a "pretty stunning" online "<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/62059" target="_blank">graphic</a> to see how many phone and cable lobbyists there really are in Washington--and how much is being spent"--and asks that we "<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/add/nbb-fcc-comment" target="_blank">tell the FCC</a> to support media that's participatory, open and democratic--and not to hand the keys to the Internet to the old guard."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/16/telecoms-rally-against-transformative-internet-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

