<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Don Imus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/don-imus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can Shock Radio Save the Fox Business Network?</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/11/can-shock-radio-save-the-fox-business-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/11/can-shock-radio-save-the-fox-business-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Imus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Business Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corpse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Corpse blogger Mark Howard (8/10/09) calls the fact that "industry sources are reporting that Don Imus is in talks with the Fox Business Network to simulcast his Imus in the Morning radio program" a "de facto admission by FBN that they have failed to attract an audience capable of sustaining the network."
Howard sees further [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News Corpse</strong> blogger Mark Howard (<a href="http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=1358" target="_blank">8/10/09</a>) calls the fact that "industry sources are <a href="http://www.allyourtv.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=418:is-imus-in-the-morning-headed-to-fox-business-network&amp;catid=1:latest-news" target="_blank">reporting</a> that Don Imus is in talks with the <strong>Fox Business Network</strong> to simulcast his <strong>Imus in the Morning</strong> radio program" a "de facto admission by <strong>FBN</strong> that they have failed to attract an audience capable of sustaining the network."</p>
<p>Howard sees further evidence of the network's struggles in that "they are approaching their second anniversary and still do not permit Nielsen to publish their ratings." And their rumored acquisition bodes ill for whatever credibility <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3798">may</a> remain:<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>Acquiring Imus would be a desperation play for eyeballs. While Imus suffered a devastating blow as a result of his "<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3307">nappy-headed hos</a>" remarks, losing his top-rated radio program and the <strong>MSNBC</strong> simulcast, he still has a smaller but significant fan base. However, for a business network to hand over the prime morning hours as the stock market opens to a shock jock with no business credibility tells you that they no longer consider business news their mission. They are grasping for any viewers they can round up.</p></blockquote>
<p>"Remember," Howard urges, "this is the network that interviewed New York's Naked Cowboy on their first day of broadcasting. They haven’t come very far since then, <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/13/no-worries-in-fox-coverage-of-murdoch-crimes/">have they</a>?"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/11/can-shock-radio-save-the-fox-business-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borat: Beyond &#039;Politically Incorrect&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/14/4031/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/14/4031/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Ansen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Imus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Ansen (Newsweek, 12/22/08) has a point when he says that the movie Borat "epitomized the [Bush] era." But he strikes a jarring note when he says:
Racism, misogyny and homophobia come pouring out of the mouths of [Sasha] Baron Cohen's unsuspecting dupes, and in a time of political correctness, when the slightest suggestion of bias [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Ansen (<strong>Newsweek</strong>, <a title="Newsweek: Cohen's Borat" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/174273" target="_blank">12/22/08</a>) has a point when he says that the movie <em>Borat</em> "epitomized the [Bush] era." But he strikes a jarring note when he says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Racism, misogyny and homophobia come pouring out of the mouths of [Sasha] Baron Cohen's unsuspecting dupes, and in a time of political correctness, when the slightest suggestion of bias on the lips of a public figure gets raked over the media coals, there was something fantastically liberating (and frightening) about seeing the national id so baldly exposed.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
Presumably Ansen's thinking of someone like Don Imus, who was "raked over the media coals" not after he showed "the slightest suggestion of bias," but after <a title="Action Alert: Why Does Tim Russert Associate With Imus' Bigotry?" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1751" target="_self">years of wallowing</a> in racist, homophobic and misogynist schtick with the <a title="Action Alert: Racism Is to Be Expected From Don Imus" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3082" target="_self">tacit approval</a> of his multitude of pals in the media elite.</p>
<p>In a media environment where the likes of <a title="LAT: Limbaugh: A Color Man Who Has A Problem With Color?" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2549" target="_self">Rush Limbaugh</a>, <a title="Action Alert: GE, Microsoft Bring Bigotry to Life" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1632" target="_self">Michael Savage</a> and <a title="Action Alert: Time Covers Coulter" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2496" target="_self">Ann Coulter</a> have wildly lucrative careers, there's no shortage of opportunities to get what Ansen calls the "national id" exposed--and celebrated.   What <em>Borat </em>provided--in the wake of the 2006 election's repudiation of Bushism--was an opportunity to see such creepiness ridiculed and scorned.  That's what makes the film, as Ansen rightly notes, a cultural landmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/14/4031/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

