<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Contessa Brewer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/contessa-brewer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MSNBC&#039;s &#039;Train Has Left the Station&#039;--and Left Truth Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/20/msnbcs-train-has-left-the-station-and-truth-behind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/20/msnbcs-train-has-left-the-station-and-truth-behind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contessa Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Benen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=8076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political Animal blogger Steve Benen (4/8/09) asks if maybe it's "Already Too Late for the Truth" in cable news coverage of U.S. military spending, considering that directly "after Defense Secretary Robert Gates unveiled his recommendations for restructuring military spending--and boosting the Pentagon budget by $21 billion (4 percent)--the response was immediate: The Obama administration is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Political Animal</strong> blogger Steve Benen (<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017664.php" target="_blank">4/8/09</a>) asks if maybe it's "Already Too Late for the Truth" in cable news <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/31/plane-crash-yields-military-budget-booster-baloney/">coverage</a> of U.S. military spending, considering that directly "after Defense Secretary Robert Gates unveiled his recommendations for restructuring military spending--and boosting the Pentagon budget by $21 billion (4 percent)--the response was immediate: The Obama administration is trying to cut defense in a time of war. It wasn't true. It didn't matter."<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Quoting a former defense secretary <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/04/contessa.php" target="_blank">telling</a> <strong>MSNBC</strong> viewers a "clearly false" tale of "deep cuts in military spending," Benen notes that anchor Contessa Brewer had asked him "to address the administration's proposed 'cuts'--not 'what some are calling "cuts,"' just matter-of-fact 'cuts,' as if this were plainly true." The fact that it was the former official himself who "eventually noted, 'By the way, it's not a cut. It's a 4 percent increase,' gives Benen</p>
<blockquote><p>the sense the train has the left the station, and it's not coming back. News outlets--including real ones, not <strong>Fox News</strong>--have <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/media-reports-major-defense-budget-cuts-as-obama-proposes-increase-in-defense-budget.php" target="_blank">already accepted</a> the bogus notion that Gates' plan cuts defense spending. Republican lawmakers aren't just repeating the false claim, they're <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/the-defense-spending-cuts-meme-grows.php" target="_blank">practically apoplectic</a> about it. The political world has apparently skipped right over the "some critics of the administration charge...." and gone right to accepting false GOP talking points as fact without debate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Benen is left feeling that "our political discourse can be awfully frustrating sometimes"--especially when "reported" so awfully as this. Listen to the latest FAIR radio show <strong>CounterSpin:</strong> "Miriam Pemberton on Military Budget" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3760">4/17/09</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/20/msnbcs-train-has-left-the-station-and-truth-behind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#039;s Giving Press Heat on Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/18/whos-giving-press-heat-on-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/18/whos-giving-press-heat-on-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contessa Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=4142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By way of suggesting that corporate media should make even more aggressive efforts to tie President-elect Barack Obama to a politician who called him a "motherfucker" for refusing to try to bribe him, MSNBC's Contessa Brewer remarks:
I know that there are journalists who are taking a lot of heat for not being aggressive and tough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By way of suggesting that corporate media should make even more aggressive efforts to tie President-elect Barack Obama to a politician who called him a <a title="Slate: No Change for Sale" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2206349/" target="_blank">"motherfucker"</a> for refusing to try to bribe him, <strong>MSNBC</strong>'s Contessa Brewer remarks:</p>
<blockquote><p>I know that there are journalists who are taking a lot of heat for <a title="Extra!: The Myth of Pro-Obama Media Bias" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3612" target="_self">not being aggressive and tough with Obama</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Noting that she has heard similar claims several times from <strong>MSNBC</strong>'s talking heads, digby (<strong>Hullabaloo</strong>, <a title="Hullabaloo: American Albatross" href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/american-albatross-by-digby-in-case-you.html" target="_blank">12/17/08</a>) asks the obvious question:</p>
<blockquote><p>Taking heat from whom?</p>
<p>I expected that after the election the press would come under pressure exactly like this. It's a classic <a title="Pitching Softballs" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2552" target="_self">"work the refs"</a> move. But the press is openly using it as an excuse for their own behavior, which is new and changed the rules, it seems to me. While they are haranguing Obama for failing to answer questions, they seem to think it's fine not to reveal who is pressuring reporters to harangue him. Maybe they need to take some questions themselves.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/18/whos-giving-press-heat-on-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

