<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Comcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/comcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Telecoms&#039; &#039;Fake Grassroots&#039; Push Net Misinformation</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/24/telecoms-fake-grassroots-push-net-misinformation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/24/telecoms-fake-grassroots-push-net-misinformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astroturf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreedomWorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartland Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetCompetition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Karr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diligent media reformers Free Press (8/19/09) have announced a nifty new "online interactive tool to expose phony grassroots groups hired by big phone and cable companies to advance their political agenda." They're talking about "'astroturf' organizations--many of which also work for the health insurance, energy and tobacco industries"-- that "are mobilizing to spread misinformation about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diligent media reformers Free Press (<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/71850" target="_blank">8/19/09</a>) have announced a nifty new "online interactive tool to expose phony grassroots groups hired by big phone and cable companies to advance their political agenda." They're talking about "'<a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/05/greg-mitchell-on-foxs-grassrootsy-astroturf/">astroturf</a>' organizations--many of which also work for the health insurance, energy and tobacco industries"-- that "are mobilizing to spread misinformation about Network Neutrality and Internet policies."</p>
<p>The group's graphic <a href="http://www.freepress.net/astroturf" target="_blank">presentation</a> "tracks the huge amounts of money that phone and cable companies spend on lobbyists and campaign contributions" and</p>
<blockquote><p>reveals the contradictory and dishonest claims about Net Neutrality and other issues from top industry executives; and it puts a spotlight on the deceptive activities of groups like FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity, NetCompetition and the Heartland Institute.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
"The fake grassroots groups are spending major resources to deceive the public and promote agendas of the corporations that sign their paychecks," said Timothy Karr, campaign director of Free Press. "We need transparency, accountability and honest debate. The crucial policy decisions being made right now about the future of the Internet must be based on independent research, reliable data and facts. The phone and cable companies <a href="https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=345" target="_blank">must stop</a> distorting the issues and hiding behind their astroturf groups, sock puppets and hired shills."</p>
<p>Along with exposing astroturf groups, the interactive tool features "The Money Trail," which tabulates spending by big phone and cable on an <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/16/telecoms-rally-against-transformative-internet-bill/">army of lobbyists</a> to push their agenda in Washington.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some disturbing totals from the past two years: "<strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/23/a-new-challenge-to-net-neutrality/">Comcast</a></strong> spent more than $45 million on campaigns and lobbying," which otherwise "could have provided one year of broadband service to 150,000 households"; and <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/04/20/activists-beat-back-tiered-internet-scheme/">Time Warner Cable</a></strong> spent $24 million on lobbying, instead of potentially having "subsidized 100,000 low-income households for one year of broadband service."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/24/telecoms-fake-grassroots-push-net-misinformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Challenge to Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/23/a-new-challenge-to-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/23/a-new-challenge-to-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Packet Inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NebuAd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media activist group Free Press has a new release (3/19/09) warning of the latest threat to free speech online: "a technology known as Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) that offers Internet service providers unprecedented control over Internet content." DPI, says Free Press, "could spell disaster for the free market online," AKA Net Neutrality. According to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media activist group Free Press has a new release (<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/49008" target="_blank">3/19/09</a>) warning of the <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/28/fighting-new-media-abusers/">latest</a> threat to free speech online: "a technology known as Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) that offers Internet service providers unprecedented control over Internet content." DPI, says Free Press, "could spell disaster for the free market online," AKA <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/18/stimulus-law-requires-neutrality-for-some-of-net/">Net Neutrality</a>. According to Free Press, DPI is designed to "monitor, control and ultimately charge subscribers for every use of an Internet connection," because it "'enables service providers to project potential revenues and profits from setting up a tiered service infrastructure' and allows providers to 'reduce the performance of applications with negative influence on revenues.'" All of which adds up to "a major threat to the open Internet":<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>DPI technology has played a central role in recent controversies surrounding Net Neutrality and online privacy. When <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=9836">Comcast</a></strong>, the nation's largest cable company, was caught secretly using DPI to block peer-to-peer applications, it was met with overwhelming public opposition and ultimately ordered by the Federal Communications Commission to stop the practice. And after advertising startup <a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/41740" target="_blank">NebuAd</a>, in partnership with several ISPs, used DPI to secretly monitor users' Internet traffic and insert unwanted advertising, the company was investigated by Congress, dropped by its ISP partners and forced to abandon the business model.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=7834">Cox Communications</a></strong> is the latest ISP to receive public scrutiny for its use of DPI technology. The cable company is conducting trials of a new system that uses DPI to prioritize traffic from online applications it arbitrarily deems "time sensitive." <strong>Cox</strong> has a history of DPI usage: Research by the Max Planck Institute in Germany last May indicated that <strong>Cox</strong> was engaging in the same blocking practice as <strong>Comcast</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the full Free Press paper, "<a title="PDF" href="http://www.freepress.net/files/Deep_Packet_Inspection_The_End_of_the_Internet_As_We_Know_It.pdf" target="_blank">Deep Packet Inspection: The End of the Internet as We Know It?</a>", a co-author of which states that "the <strong>Cox</strong> trial, coupled with other DPI abuses, is setting the alarming precedent that Internet service providers can pick winners and losers online."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/23/a-new-challenge-to-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
