<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Chris Cillizza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/chris-cillizza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Everyone Could Have a Mark Halperin Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/05/everyone-could-have-a-mark-halperin-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/05/everyone-could-have-a-mark-halperin-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Halperin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=18679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza's curious take on the Mark Halperin affair:
The truth of the Halperin matter is that all reporters (or others) who go on television frequently are forever in a “there but for the grace of God go I” situation.... We know of what we speak, having found ourselves tongue-tied or worse on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Washington Post</strong>'s Chris Cillizza's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/todays_paper/Outlook/2011-07-03/B/2/22.0.4107711835_epaper.html">curious take</a> on the Mark Halperin affair:</p>
<blockquote><p>The truth of the Halperin matter is that all reporters (or others) who go on television frequently are forever in a “there but for the grace of God go I” situation.... We know of what we speak, having found ourselves tongue-tied or worse on any number of occasions while staring into a camera. And in an ill-fated 2009 video venture known as <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/05/AR2009080502394.html">“Mouthpiece Theater,”</a> The Fix had to live down an inappropriate reference to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.</p></blockquote>
<p>For those who <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/">might be unaware</a>, he's referring to the skit where he and <strong>Post</strong> colleague Dana Milbank likened Hillary Clinton to a "mad bitch." This was a scripted satirical video; the "bitch" reference came in the form of an image, which would suggest they'd thought about it well in advance. There's something utterly predictable-- and pathetic-- about reporters who react to these scandals by suggesting that if you talk into a microphone often enough you're bound to say something stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/07/05/everyone-could-have-a-mark-halperin-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo &#039;Screw-You&#039; Video Follows &#039;Mad Bitch&#039; Offense</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/wapo-screw-you-video-follows-mad-bitch-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/wapo-screw-you-video-follows-mad-bitch-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adele M. Stan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcus Brauchli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WashingtonPost.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women In Media & News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Women In Media &#38; News blogger Adele M. Stan (8/5/09) has some more to say about the WashingtonPost.com's "now-infamous 'Mad Bitch' video":
Last Friday, Talking Points Memo's Brian Beutler shone a light on a video produced by the Washington Post that featured one of the two columnists hosting the piece suggesting that, at a future [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guest <strong>Women In Media &amp; News</strong> blogger Adele M. Stan (<a href="http://www.wimnonline.org/WIMNsVoicesBlog/2009/08/05/responding-to-womens-concerns-washington-post-kills-offensive-video-series-cillizza-apologizes-milbank-whines/" target="_blank">8/5/09</a>) has some more to say about the <strong>WashingtonPost.com</strong>'s "now-infamous 'Mad Bitch' video":</p>
<blockquote><p>Last Friday, <strong>Talking Points Memo</strong>'s Brian Beutler <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/in-beer-summit-spoof-milbank-suggests-hillary-drink-mad-bitch-beer.php" target="_blank">shone a light</a> on a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907310026" target="_blank">video</a> produced by the <strong>Washington Post</strong> that featured one of the two columnists hosting the piece suggesting that, at a future White House beer summit, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton be given a brew called "Mad Bitch." Then all hell broke loose.</p>
<p>The <strong>Post</strong> apparently thought it could fix the problem by simply pulling the video. A note was posted above the hole where the video used to be, reading that the piece had been removed because it contained material that was "inappropriate" for the <strong>Post</strong> website. As if it had landed there from Mars. As if it hadn't been written and produced in the <strong>Washington Post</strong> building by <strong>Washington Post</strong> staffers.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Then, yesterday, the two columnists, Chris Cillizza and Dana Milbank, had the effrontery to post what amounts to a "screw-you" <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2009/07/06/VI2009070601109.html" target="_blank">response video</a> to the criticism they had received from bloggers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Stan reports that, in the fallout, "the series has been canceled," but "Milbank remains pretty unrepentant, instead <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/">whining</a> about the drubbing he took at the hands of blogosphere denizens."</p>
<p>Even after receiving a <a href="http://www.centerfornewwords.org/wam/wapoletter.php" target="_blank">critical letter</a> signed by Stan, Jennifer Pozman, Katha Pollitt and many others, <strong>Post</strong> executive editor Marcus "Brauchli, for his part, did not exactly apologize," and "it does not appear that there will be any disciplinary action."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/09/wapo-screw-you-video-follows-mad-bitch-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snarky WaPo-er &#039;Surprised by the Ferocity out There&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Serwer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapped]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz recently offered fellow Washington Post reporters Dana Milbank and Chris Cillizza a chance to apologize for having, in an online Post feature, "implied Hillary Clinton was a 'bitch.'"
But American Prospect's Tapped blogger Adam Serwer (8/5/09) has a question regarding Milbank's aside that "it's a brutal world out there in the blogosphere.... I'm often [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Kurtz recently offered fellow <strong>Washington Post</strong> reporters <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/12/dana-milbanks-bubble-problem/">Dana Milbank</a> and <a title="see paragraph 11" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3098">Chris Cillizza</a> a chance to apologize for having, in an online <strong>Post</strong> feature, "<a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=07&amp;year=2009&amp;base_name=genderbeer_draft" target="_blank">implied</a> Hillary Clinton was a 'bitch.'"</p>
<p>But <strong>American Prospect</strong>'s <strong>Tapped</strong> blogger Adam Serwer (<a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=08&amp;year=2009&amp;base_name=cant_ball_dont_play#116146" target="_blank">8/5/09</a>) has a question regarding Milbank's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/05/AR2009080502394.html" target="_blank">aside</a> that "it's a brutal world out there in the blogosphere.... I'm often surprised by the ferocity out there, but I probably shouldn't be":</p>
<blockquote><p>What's the sound of a million hands facepalming? No one who goes around using <a title="Think Progress: The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank calls Nico Pitney a ‘dick’ after heated debate on CNN" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/28/milbank-pitney/" target="_blank">obscenities</a> to describe other reporters and administration officials should be complaining about the "ferocity" of blogs--if Milbank is bothered by it, he might start by admitting his own complicity in creating that kind of discourse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Serwer's reiteration that "Milbank's unique place in the journalism world entails him making fun of people for a living" yields a simple maxim: "If you can't take it, don't <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/28/milbank-pitney/" target="_blank">dish it</a>."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/07/snarky-wapo-er-surprised-by-the-ferocity-out-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

