<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Carl Levin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/carl-levin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Meet the Press Continues the Non-Debate on Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/meet-the-press-continues-the-non-debate-on-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/meet-the-press-continues-the-non-debate-on-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Naureckas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry McCaffrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Weisbrot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meet the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Meyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Weisbrot had a good column in the London Guardian (10/23/09)  about the highly circumscribed "debate" over the Afghanistan War (FAIR Action Alert, 8/25/09). He breaks down the lineup of a recent Meet the Press (10/11/09):

Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, former Army general and drug czar (under President Clinton) turned defense industry lobbyist. In a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Weisbrot had a good column in the London <strong>Guardian</strong> (<a title="Guardian: America's Real Quagmire" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/oct/23/obama-media-afghanistan-healthcare" target="_blank">10/23/09</a>)  about the highly circumscribed "debate" over the Afghanistan War (FAIR Action Alert, <a title="Action Alert: Where Is the Afghanistan Debate?" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3886">8/25/09</a>). He breaks down the lineup of a recent <strong>Meet the Press</strong> (<a title="Meet the Press: Transcript for October 11, 2009" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33253216/ns/meet_the_press/" target="_blank">10/11/09</a>):<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, former Army general and drug czar (under President Clinton) turned defense industry lobbyist. In a news article on McCaffrey entitled "<a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Hpc1NnaynkmpBvUIi6mN2b8ffsJsEfVd">One Man's Military-Industrial-Media Complex</a>," the <strong>New York Time</strong>s reported that McCaffrey had "earned at least $500,000 from his work for Veritas Capital, a private equity firm in New York that has grown into a defense industry powerhouse by buying contractors whose profits soared from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq." McCaffrey has appeared on <strong>NBC</strong> more than 1,000 times since 9/11/2001.</p>
<p>Retired Gen. Richard Meyers, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Bush (2002-05). He is currently on the Board of Directors of Northrop Grumman Corporation, one of the largest military contractors in the world, and also of United Technologies Corporation, another large military contractor.</p>
<p>Sen. Lindsay Graham, Republican from South Carolina, a pro-war spokesperson who is one of the most regular guests on the Sunday talkshows.</p>
<p>Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, a Democrat, was apparently intended to represent the "other side" of the debate. Here is what he said: "Clearly we should keep the number of forces that we have.  No one's talking about removing forces."</p>
<p>"No one," in the above sentence refers to the American people, whom Levin understandably sees as nobody in the eyes of the U.S. media and political leaders. According to the latest (September 24) <strong>NYT</strong>/<strong>CBS News</strong> poll, 32 percent of those polled wanted U.S. troops out of Afghanistan within one year or right now. That was the largest group. Another 24 percent wants the troops "removed within one to two years." For comparison, the leadership of the Taliban is willing to grant foreign troops 18 months to get out of their country.</p>
<p>In other words, a majority of 56 percent of Americans wants U.S. troops out of Afghanistan about as soon as is practically feasible or even sooner. Yet <strong>Meet the Press</strong>--a mainstream network news talkshow since 1947--does not see fit to find one person to represent that point of view. The other major TV and radio talkshows that the right also labels "liberal" in the United States make similar choices almost every day.</p>
<p>When asked whether the U.S. should set a timeline for withdrawal, Levin answered "no."</p></blockquote>
<p>This phenomenon of the non-debate is not confined to broadcast journalism; see recent <strong>FAIR Blog</strong> posts on fake Afghanistan debates in<strong> Time</strong> magazine (<a title="FAIR Blog: Time's Afghanistan Debate" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/02/times-afghanistan-debate-more-troops-or-a-lot-more-troops/" target="_self">10/2/09</a>), <strong>USA Today</strong> (<a title="FAIR Blog: USA Today's Afghanistan Non-Debate" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/" target="_self">9/17/09</a>) and the <strong>Washington Post</strong> (<a title="FAIR Blog: The Washington Post's Afghanistan Debate" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/01/the-washington-posts-afghanistan-debate/" target="_self">9/01/09</a>, <a title="FAIR Blog: The Washington Post's Non-Debate on Afghanistan" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/17/the-washington-posts-non-debate-on-afghanistan/" target="_self">8/17/09</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/meet-the-press-continues-the-non-debate-on-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
