<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Cable TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/cable-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Way Cleared for More &#039;Excessive Media Consolidation&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/29/way-cleared-for-more-excessive-media-consolidation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/29/way-cleared-for-more-excessive-media-consolidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On news that "today, a federal court threw out the Federal Communications Commission's rule to cap cable ownership at 30 percent," Free Press (8/28/09) comments "the rule served as an important consumer protection from media consolidation and growing cable cartels, and encouraged diversity in ownership in the cable industry."
The media advocacy group's Ben Scott further [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On news that "today, a federal court threw out the Federal Communications Commission's rule to cap cable ownership at 30 percent," Free Press (<a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/72229" target="_blank">8/28/09</a>) comments "the rule served as an important consumer protection from media consolidation and growing cable cartels, and encouraged diversity in ownership in the cable industry."</p>
<p>The media advocacy group's <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/06/19/on-atts-arbitrary-intervention-in-the-open-internet/">Ben Scott</a> further calls it</p>
<blockquote><p>regrettable that the court tossed out an important public interest protection against excessive media consolidation. Congressional intent in the Cable Act of 1992 is very clear--the goals of federal policy in the cable industry are to promote competition, consumer choice and a diversity of programming. And yet today we have a cable cartel--the video industry is <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/20/indy-filmers-create-most-jobs-own-least-content/">dominated</a> by only a handful of large cable operators and studios.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Today consumers experience perpetual price hikes by large operators that already have market dominating purchasing power to decide <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/19/only-english-gaza-news-shut-out-of-us-cable/">the fate</a> of new channels. The promises of lower prices through competition from satellite and telecom companies in the video business have never been realized.</p></blockquote>
<p>While today "the court ruled the FCC's action as 'arbitrary and capricious,'" Free Press reminds us of how "the same court threw out the rule <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1082">in 2001</a>, but it was reinstated by the FCC in 2008 due to fears of <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3423">growing</a> market power of big cable companies."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/29/way-cleared-for-more-excessive-media-consolidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only English Gaza News Shut Out of U.S. Cable</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/19/only-english-gaza-news-shut-out-of-us-cable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/19/only-english-gaza-news-shut-out-of-us-cable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=6041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though "Al Jazeera English is also on the cusp of a carriage deal in Canada," Broadcasting &#38; Cable's Marisa Guthrie reports (2/18/09) that the channel has "had little luck getting picked up by U.S. cable and satellite providers." As part of an effort to "appeal to consumers via a grassroots marketing campaign that attempts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though "<strong>Al Jazeera English</strong> is also on the cusp of a carriage deal in Canada," <strong>Broadcasting &amp; Cable</strong>'s Marisa Guthrie reports (<a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/174334-Al_Jazeera_English_Launches_Grass_Roots_Carriage_Campaign.php" target="_blank">2/18/09</a>) that the channel has "had <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=10191" target="_self">little luck</a> getting picked up by U.S. cable and satellite providers." As part of an effort to "appeal to consumers via a grassroots marketing campaign that attempts to dispel long-held attitudes about the network," <strong>AJE</strong> has "launched a website that bluntly addresses popular perceptions about the English language offshoot of <strong>Al Jazeera</strong>, the most-watched news network in the Middle East":</p>
<blockquote><p>The site, <a href="http://iwantaje.net/" target="_blank">IWantAJE.net</a>, lets consumers send electronic letters directly to their cable or satellite provider demanding the channel. It also includes a "Speak Out" forum and a "Hits &amp; Myths" page debunking popular assertions, such as: "<strong>Al Jazeera </strong>Supports Terrorism," "<strong>Al Jazeera</strong> Is Anti-Semitic," "<strong>Al Jazeera</strong> Is Anti-American" and "<strong>Al Jazeera</strong> Shows Beheadings."...<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
<strong>AJE</strong> filled a <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3672" target="_self">news vacuum</a> during the recent war in Gaza, when Israel’s decision to <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/04/silence-is-a-dangerous-sound/" target="_self">ban</a> foreign journalists from the region arguably gave <strong>Al Jazeera English</strong> a priceless amount of exposure. As the only English-language news organization with a presence in Gaza, its reports and video were widely seen on television sets in the U.S. and Canada. <strong>PBS</strong>'s <strong>World Focus</strong> aired full segments. And other networks, including <strong>NBC News</strong> and the <strong>CBC</strong>, aired video from <strong>Al Jazeera English</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed, "traffic on the network’s website... spiked by 600 percent during the war in Gaza." Contrast the fact that "more than half of that traffic came from North America" with current accessibility: "<strong>AJE</strong> is available in 130 million households internationally but is only carried in the U.S. in <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=10285" target="_self">Burlington, Vt.</a>; Toledo, Ohio; and Washington, D.C."</p>
<p>Listen to the FAIR radio program <strong>CounterSpin:</strong> "Ken Picard on Al-Jazeera in Burlington" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3385" target="_self">6/6/08</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/19/only-english-gaza-news-shut-out-of-us-cable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

