<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Bob Beckel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/bob-beckel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>USA Today &#039;Debates&#039; Nuclear Power</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/03/24/usa-today-debates-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/03/24/usa-today-debates-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Beckel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal Thomas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=17742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today has a regular left-right feature between hard-right pundit Cal Thomas and TV "liberal" Bob Beckel. Today's topic? Nuclear power. And the verdict? Well, the headline tells you all you need to know.
 Knee-Jerks and Nukes 
Cal and Bob agree that despite the chorus of hand-wringers, it would be foolish to give up on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Today</strong> has a regular left-right feature between hard-right pundit Cal Thomas and TV "liberal" Bob Beckel. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20110324/column24_st.art.htm">Today's topic</a>? Nuclear power. And the verdict? Well, the headline tells you all you need to know.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong> </strong><strong>Knee-Jerks and Nukes </strong></p>
<p>Cal and Bob agree that despite the chorus of hand-wringers, it would be foolish to give up on nuclear power plants in the wake of Japan's tragedy</p></blockquote>
<p>To give you a sense of the seriousness of the discussion, here's Beckel criticizing Joe Lieberman:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Bob:</strong> I grew up in his home state near one of the country's oldest nuclear power plants (the Connecticut Yankee plant), and in all its years of operation--like virtually every other nuclear plant in the world--not a single life-threatening event has occurred.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
<strong>Cal:</strong> And you told me you used to swim in the warm water generated by that plant. No wonder you became a liberal!</p></blockquote>
<p>I had heard Cal Thomas was funny, but not <em>that </em>funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/03/24/usa-today-debates-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Commentators Find &#039;Common Ground&#039; in Praising Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/31/fox-news-commentators-find-common-ground-in-praising-fox-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/31/fox-news-commentators-find-common-ground-in-praising-fox-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Hollar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Beckel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=14113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of USA Today's regular op-ed features is a "right-left" conversation between conservative columnist Cal Thomas and "liberal" Democratic strategist Bob Beckel in which they seek "Common Ground"--the name of the op-ed feature--on "issues that lawmakers in Washington cannot."
Last week (3/25/10) Thomas and Beckel tackled the issue of "Bias and Fox News"--and really, what could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of <strong>USA Today</strong>'s regular op-ed features is a "right-left" conversation between conservative columnist Cal Thomas and "liberal" Democratic strategist Bob Beckel in which they seek "Common Ground"--the name of the op-ed feature--on "issues that lawmakers in Washington cannot."</p>
<p>Last week (<a href="http://http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/common-ground/2010-03-25-column25_ST_N.htm">3/25/10</a>) Thomas and Beckel tackled the issue of "Bias and <strong>Fox News</strong>"--and really, what could be a better subject of debate for two paid <strong>Fox News</strong> commentators? Incredibly, they were able to overcome their great differences to defend the network that pays their bills.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Some of the highlights:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Cal:</strong> What the Obama administration and Raines and many at the <strong>Huffington Post</strong> and elsewhere in the Liberal Hemisphere are lamenting is that the media monopoly has ended. Journalists have <a title="Extra!: Examing the 'Liberal Media' Claim" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2447">tended to be liberal</a>, and until the past decade or so, the newspapers and networks <a title="Extra!: From the Top: What Are the Politics of Network Bosses?" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2448" target="_self">held the megaphones</a>. The voices leaving those megaphones all <a title="Extra!: Power Sources: On party, gender, race and class, TV news looks to the most powerful groups" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1109" target="_self">sounded the same</a>. Well, now everyone has a megaphone. And it might be noisier, but as President <a title="James Buchanan: Remarks to Congress on Slavery" href="http://www.milestonedocuments.com/documents/full-text/james-buchanans-remarks-to-congress-on-slavery/" target="_blank">James Buchanan</a> said, "I like the noise of democracy."</p>
<p><strong>Bob</strong>: Hear, hear.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, that's the voice of "the left." And even Beckel's attempts at differentiating himself from Thomas manage to come around to a plug for <strong>Fox</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Cal:</strong> And say what you will about Beck, but he teaches a lot of history that many Americans have either forgotten or were never exposed to in public schools.</p>
<p><strong>Bob:</strong> Beck has brought liberal criticism on himself. Calling President Obama a racist was way out of bounds. I got on <strong>Fox </strong>the day after that comment and blasted Beck. I never received a single comment from anyone at <strong>Fox </strong>for doing so. In fact, no one at <strong>Fox </strong>has ever suggested I ease up on my criticism of conservatives.</p></blockquote>
<p>While no such "blast" could be found in the Nexis database (<strong>Fox</strong> doesn't transcribe all of its shows), here's a typical Beckel "criticism" on <strong>Fox </strong>(<strong>Hannity</strong>, 10/19/09):</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>BECKEL:</strong> The issue here is the question of the <strong>Fox News</strong> issue, which is something very near and dear to my heart, since I've been on this network now for six years. And I will say this. What I don't understand is, they can disagree with you--and they should because they're right and you're wrong. And so's Beck and so's O'Reilly.</p>
<p>But the rest of these shows are news shows, and good shows. And why they leave this up to a few of us to come on the air against wing nuts, I mean, if you can't--I have to go up against Michele Bachmann, against Michelle Malkin. I mean, if you can't handle Michele Bachmann, you Democrats out there won't come on, you don't deserve to be in the business.</p>
<p><strong>HANNITY: </strong>Have I been fair to you?</p>
<p><strong>BECKEL:</strong> Yes, you have.</p></blockquote>
<p>That <strong>Fox</strong>'s "news" shows are less partisan or ideological than its "opinion" shows is <strong>Fox</strong>'s standard defense (and one that both Beckel and Thomas bring up in their <strong>USAT </strong>debate), but it's easy enough to debunk; see <strong>Extra!</strong>: "<span><strong>Fox News</strong>—Wing of the GOP?" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3957">12/09</a>) by Steve Rendall. </span></p>
<p>Beckel's brand of <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/">"criticism"</a> is hardly likely to earn him a reprimand from <strong>Fox</strong>--in fact, it's exactly what <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/11/how-to-get-a-job-as-a-tv-leftist/">gets you a gig</a> on <strong>Fox News</strong>--as well as at<strong> USA Today</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/31/fox-news-commentators-find-common-ground-in-praising-fox-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA Today&#039;s Afghanistan Non-Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Beckel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today 's left/right op-ed feature today is a doozy-- a "debate" on escalating the Afghan War between regulars Cal Thomas and Bob Beckel. The headline gives it away:
Time to Dig In, Not Bail Out 
Forget left or right. Forget politics. Think "war on terror." Bob and Cal agree that now is not the time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Today</strong> 's left/right op-ed <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090917/column17_st.art.htm">feature today</a> is a doozy-- a "debate" on escalating the <a title="FAIR Blog: The Washington Post's Non-Debate on Afghanistan" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/17/the-washington-posts-non-debate-on-afghanistan/" target="_self">Afghan War</a> between regulars Cal Thomas and Bob Beckel. The headline gives it away:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Time to Dig In, Not Bail Out </strong></p>
<p>Forget left or right. Forget politics. Think "war on terror." Bob and Cal agree that now is not the time to abandon the war in Afghanistan.</p></blockquote>
<p>The back and forth between arch-conservative Thomas and <a title="Extra!: I'm Not a Leftist, But I Play One on TV" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1969" target="_self"> TV leftist</a> Beckel ends with this exchange:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Bob</strong>: As much as my liberal instincts want us out of this war, I have to agree with you that it's time to stay and fight. The more dangerous path would be to retreat.</p>
<p><strong>Cal</strong>: Among the many things I admire about you, Bob, is that you are often able to overcome your instincts when facts get in the way. Your party was once a keeper of freedom's flame when it came to engaging and defeating Communism. Now we have a new enemy. Nothing would benefit America more than to see Democrats and Republicans unite to defeat this enemy.</p></blockquote>
<p>The thing that Cal Thomas admires about his liberal sparring partner--his inability to be an actual advocate for the left--is exactly the same quality that the corporate media look for in liberal pundits. It earns you a pat on the head from Cal Thomas, and a regular gig as a <a title="FAIR Blog: How to Get a Job as a TV Leftist" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/12/11/how-to-get-a-job-as-a-tv-leftist/" target="_self">TV leftist</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/17/usa-todays-afghanistan-non-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

