<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Anita Dunn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/anita-dunn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fox Commentators Guarding Bias Henhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/13/fox-commentators-guarding-bias-henhouse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/13/fox-commentators-guarding-bias-henhouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rendall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anita Dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brit Hume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 2001 study, FAIR found that in its regular one-on-one interviews, Fox News' flagship news show Special Report With Brit Hume favored Republican guests over Democrats by a greater than 8-to-1 ratio. After the FAIR report, Hume told the New York Times (7/2/01) that if the data warranted, he  would rectify the bias: "If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1072">2001 study</a>, FAIR found that in its regular one-on-one interviews, <strong>Fox News</strong>' flagship news show <strong>Special Report With Brit Hume</strong> favored Republican guests over Democrats by a greater than 8-to-1 ratio. After the FAIR report, Hume told the <strong>New York Times</strong> (7/2/01) that if the data warranted, he  would rectify the bias: "If it is a reasonable question, and we find that there is some imbalance, then we’ll correct it." A 2002 follow-up study (<strong>Extra!</strong>, 7-8/02) showed some improvement--a mere 3-to-2 bias in favor of GOP over Democratic guests--but by 2004, <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1187">FAIR showed</a>, the ratio had crept back up to a 5-to-1 advantage for Republicans.</p>
<p>Last night, in an attempt to rebut White House communications director Anita Dunn's recent claim that <strong>Fox News</strong> "often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party," <strong>Fox News</strong>' Bill O’Reilly brought on Brit Hume as an expert on media bias (<strong>O'Reilly Factor</strong>, 10/12/09).</p>
<p>Hume claimed that <strong>Fox</strong> doesn’t feature "very many people who are down-the-line advocates for whatever the Republican party is up to," and that "the Republican party takes a fair amount of fairly sharp criticism on <strong>Fox News</strong> and has for a long time." Hume offered no evidence and ignored the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.</p>
<p>And, though it is beside the point of whether or not <strong>Fox News</strong> is an arm of the GOP, Hume wheeled out <strong>Fox</strong>'s old attack on the rest of the corporate media. Citing his pre-<strong>Fox</strong> career at outlets like <strong>ABC News</strong>, Hume told O’Reilly: "It wasn't that I couldn't report the news in the way that I saw fit. It was that I often had to argue for doing it a different way than the headlines on the front page of the <strong>New York Times</strong> seemed to direct the network coverage."</p>
<p>With bias experts like Hume, one might wonder if <strong>Fox</strong> would feature the Unabomber as an expert on domestic terrorism. Certainly no one can say that Hume didn't get to report the news the way he "saw fit" at <strong>Fox</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/13/fox-commentators-guarding-bias-henhouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
