<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Alicia Shepard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/alicia-shepard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NPR Ombud Dodges &#039;Torture&#039; Reporting Critic</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/06/npr-ombud-dodges-torture-reporting-critic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/06/npr-ombud-dodges-torture-reporting-critic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alicia Shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Owens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=10536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon's Glenn Greenwald has an update (7/2/09, ad-viewing required) on "several noteworthy developments since I wrote on Tuesday about the refusal of NPR's ombudsman, Alicia Shepard, to be interviewed by me about NPR's ban on using the word 'torture' to describe the Bush administration's interrogation tactics":
Given the utter vapidity of her rationale ("there are two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Salon</strong>'s Glenn Greenwald has an update (<a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/02/npr/index.html" target="_blank">7/2/09</a>, ad-viewing required) on "several noteworthy developments since I <a title="ad-viewing required" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/06/30/shepard/index.html" target="_blank">wrote</a> on Tuesday about the refusal of <strong>NPR</strong>'s ombudsman, Alicia Shepard, to be interviewed by me about <strong>NPR</strong>'s ban on using the word 'torture' to describe the Bush administration's interrogation tactics":</p>
<blockquote><p>Given the utter vapidity of her <a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2009/06/26/02" target="_blank">rationale</a> ("there are two sides to the issue. And I'm not sure, why is it so important to call something torture?"), I was momentarily amazed to learn that she actually teaches "<a href="http://scs.georgetown.edu/departments/11/master-of-professional-studies-in-journalism/faculty-bio.cfm?a=a&amp;fId=1092" target="_blank">Media Ethics</a>" to graduate students at Georgetown University....</p>
<p><strong>NPR</strong>'s "torture" ban and its ombudsman's incoherent defense of it has now turned into a significant controversy for <strong>NPR</strong>--and rightfully so. <!--preview-break--> Yesterday, the <strong>Huffington Post</strong> trumpeted the controversy in a <a title="ad-viewing required" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/02/npr/index1.html" target="_blank">prominent headline</a> all day long, focusing on Shepard's refusal to be interviewed here. The media reporter Simon Owens wrote a long <a href="http://bloggasm.com/why-wont-nprs-ombud-speak-to-salons-glenn-greenwald" target="_blank">column</a> on Shepard's refusal to discuss her rationale with me despite my having been a primary critic of <strong>NPR</strong>'s policy. (Indeed, this controversy began several weeks ago when I <a title="ad-viewing required" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/06/06/nyt/" target="_blank">noted</a> the <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/26/self-serving-propaganda-no-problem-on-npr/">ample</a> documentation from <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/06/npr-justifying-and-sanitizing-the-us-torture-regime/">NPR Check</a></strong> of <strong>NPR</strong>'s steadfast <a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/05/riddle-wrapped-in-mystery.html" target="_blank">refusal</a> to use the word "torture" and the embarrassing contortions it employs to accomplish that.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Despite Shepard's avoidance of him, Greenwald notes that she "went on another <strong>NPR</strong>-affiliated show" for <a href="http://www.scpr.org/programs/patt-morrison/2009/06/26/calling-a-spade-a-spade-use-of-the-word-torture/" target="_blank">a segment</a> "that included several good questions" and "a very well-compiled, illustrative and cringe-inducing montage of <strong>NPR</strong>'s repeatedly going out of its way to avoid calling Bush interrogation tactics 'torture,' juxtaposed with an excerpt where <strong>NPR</strong> explicitly accused Iraqis in Sadr City of 'using torture' against detainees."</p>
<p>Read more on <strong>NPR</strong>'s longstanding problematic reporting on U.S. torture--and Alicia Shepard's inconsistent defense of it--in the FAIR publication <strong>Extra! Update:</strong> "Tortured Justifications for Bad Journalism" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3413">12/07</a>) by Jim Naureckas &amp; Candice O'Grady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/06/npr-ombud-dodges-torture-reporting-critic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR Can (but Doesn&#039;t) &#039;Take a Lesson&#039; from Jon Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/16/npr-can-but-doesnt-take-a-lesson-from-jon-stewart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/16/npr-can-but-doesnt-take-a-lesson-from-jon-stewart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alicia Shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=7161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When NPR ombud Alicia Shepard commented on an NPR blog that "we can all take a lesson from" Jon Stewart because "he holds people in power accountable for what they say"--this being her "definition of a good journalist"--Matthew Murrey, AKA NPR Check blogger Mytwords, couldn't resist asking "So when will Shepard hold the NPR journalists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <strong>NPR</strong> ombud <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3209">Alicia Shepard</a> commented on an <strong>NPR</strong> blog that "we can all take a lesson from" <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/13/jim-cramer-calm-sober-wild-man/">Jon Stewart</a> because "he holds people in power accountable for what they say"--this being her "definition of a good journalist"--Matthew Murrey, AKA <strong>NPR Check</strong> blogger Mytwords, couldn't resist <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2009/03/comments/the_extended_uncut_daily_show.html" target="_blank" title="sort by Most Recommended">asking</a> "So when will Shepard hold the <strong>NPR</strong> journalists to such a standard?" Mytwords' challenge of Shepard "(or anyone for that matter) to show any examples in the last 10 years where <strong>NPR</strong>'s main news shows... 'held people in power accountable'" was met by one reader (<a href="http://nprcheck.blogspot.com/2009/03/from-inbox.html" target="_blank">3/15/09</a>) who had</p>
<blockquote><p>only heard one instance of <strong>NPR</strong> actually standing up to spin by an interviewee: <!--preview-break--> <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15046448" target="_blank">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15046448</a></p>
<p>I've never heard anything like it since, and I listen almost every day.</p>
<p>As I recall, there were tons of people who wrote in letters showing support and calling for more: <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15198525" target="_blank">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15198525</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Mytwords is encouraged "that listeners seem to be hungry for a higher quality of reporting even though it's rare on <strong>NPR</strong>"--but the sad fact is that after "carefully <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/10/npr-blames-iraqi-deaths-on-iran-kuwait-iraq/">critiquing</a> <strong>NPR</strong> for almost three years," Mytwords has found "<strong>NPR News</strong> consistently echoes and champions the opinions and assertions of the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and free market corporatism."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/03/16/npr-can-but-doesnt-take-a-lesson-from-jon-stewart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR, Fox Collude to Hide Fake Lefty</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/npr-fox-collude-to-hide-fake-lefty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/npr-fox-collude-to-hide-fake-lefty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alicia Shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=5827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noting that "news organizations often encourage their journalists to appear on other platforms for promotional purposes," former TVNewser Brian Stelter reports (New York Times, 2/15/09) that, "when the National Public Radio analyst Juan Williams speaks on the Fox News Channel's highest-rated program, the radio network doesn't want any attention":
Mr. Williams, a longtime political analyst and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noting that "news organizations often encourage their journalists to appear on other platforms for promotional purposes," former <strong><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=8918">TVNewser</a></strong> Brian Stelter reports (<strong>New York Times</strong>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/16/business/media/16williams.html" target="_blank">2/15/09</a>) that, "when the <strong>National Public Radio</strong> analyst Juan Williams speaks on the <strong>Fox News Channel</strong>'s highest-rated program, the radio network doesn't want any attention":</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Williams, a longtime political analyst and author, is a paid contributor to both <strong>NPR</strong> and <strong>Fox News</strong>. His voice is a prominent one at <strong>Fox</strong>; he was a panelist for the network's coverage of election night and Inauguration Day. When he appears on the cable channel, he is regularly described as a "senior correspondent for <strong>NPR</strong>." While that title is accurate, <strong>NPR</strong> has asked Mr. Williams to ask <strong>Fox</strong> not to identify him that way when he appears on the <strong>O'Reilly Factor</strong>, the network's 8 p.m. opinion program.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
The request was made after Mr. Williams <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/12/npr-embarassed-by-juan-williams/" target="_blank">said</a> on the <strong>Factor</strong> that Michelle Obama has "got this <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/about_king/encyclopedia/carmichael_stokely.html" target="_blank">Stokely-Carmichael</a>-in-a-designer-dress thing going." The allusion to Mr. Carmichael, a leader of the black power movement of the 1960s, spurred dozens of angry e-mail messages to Alicia C. Shepard, the <strong>NPR</strong> ombudswoman, and resulted in conversations between Mr. Williams and the radio network's editors.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shepard's <a href="http://www.npr.org/ombudsman/2009/02/juan_williams_npr_and_fox_news_1.html" target="_blank">response</a> was one of concern that Williams "tends to speak one way on <strong>NPR</strong> and another on <strong>Fox</strong>"--while <strong>Fox</strong> itself took a condescending shot at <strong>NPR</strong> when announcing it would happily deceive its own viewers: "<strong>Fox</strong> swiftly said that it would drop the radio references--not only on the <strong>Factor</strong>, but on all the network's hours of programming. 'We were doing <strong>NPR</strong> a favor by even plugging them.'"</p>
<p>See the FAIR magazine <strong>Extra!:</strong> "Field Guide to TV's Lukewarm Liberals: How to Spot Centrist Pundits Served Up As the 'Left'" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2499">7-8/98</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/02/17/npr-fox-collude-to-hide-fake-lefty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
