The news that the Boston Marathon bombs used conventional pressure cookers led to a flurry of coverage suggesting that this was perhaps a link to Al-Qaeda–inspired jihadists.
At the Daily Beast (4/16/13), Eli Lake wrote a piece with this headline:
He was sure to throw in a caveat—this is “far from definitive proof” that the bombing was linked to Al-Qaeda—but the lead pretty clear told the story:
A key component of the bombs used yesterday in the attacks on the Boston Marathon resemble the kind of homemade bomb Al-Qaeda has encouraged English-speaking terrorists to use.
These have been around for a long time. (cc photo: Black Country Museums)
But is that really much of a link at all? Well, the Washington Post‘s Max Fisher (4/16/13) thought not, writing a piece headlined “Knowledge of Pressure-Cooker Bombs Is Not Limited to Readers of Al-Qaeda’s ‘Inspire’ Magazine”:
Yair Rosenberg of Tablet Magazine points out on Twitter that The Anarchist’s Cookbook, published in 1971, also included information on how to make them. The book appears to have provided the necessary instructions for at least one such bombing, in 1976 at Grand Central Station. In 1973, police had discovered a similar device in the New York Port Authority building.
Today, there appears to be a miniature subculture of Americans building small pressure-cooker bombs for the exclusive purpose of detonating them harmlessly in empty fields and posting video of the explosion to YouTube.
But the Al-Qaeda link proved irresistible to some in the media. Fox News host Bret Baier explained on the Five (4/16/13):
I mean, listen, you have this Al-Qaeda cookbook about how to make bombs. I mean, this particular type of bomb was described in Inspire magazine, which is Al-Qaeda magazine, of “how to make the bomb in kitchen of your mom,” was the title of the article. And essentially, it is what Al-Qaeda has used and Al-Qaeda–inspired groups have used in different incidents.
Sounds like an open-and-shut case—if you ignore four decades of domestic history, that is.
I think it’s fair to point to the Al-Qaeda (spelling of the day) magazine piece as one possibility, but the overarching impression you get is that there’s much fervent hope that that is indeed the case.
And given the choice between knowing with certainty who’s responsible, and being able to continue to insinuate the above
You have to question which they would choose, don’t you?
Aaah, yes, i caught Peter Hart, man of many hats, on Democracy Now today. I wasn’t previously aware that he was also a terrorism expert with extensive knowledge about bombs. This guy is AMAZING, just ask him.
WOULD PLEASE PROVIDE EMAIL AS A WAY TO SEND ARTICLES? MOST OF MY FRIENDS ABHOR FACEBOOK. I’M A TWIT BUT DON’T TWEET, AND DON’T WANT TO BE LINKEDIN. WHAT’S WRONG WITH GOOD OLD PLAIN EMAIL? BY THE WAY, THERE WERE ISLAMIC RADICALS BEFORE AMERICA OR ISRAEL EXISTED. I ONCE LIVED, OR EXISTED, IN VIENNA FOR A YEAR. KEPT WISHING THE MUSLIM HORDE HAD CROSSED IN INSTEAD OF ONLY LEAVING COFFEE. INSTEAD THE NAZI HORDE THEN STALIN’S MURDEROUS HORDE CAME CLOSE. AUSTRIANS ACTUALLY PRETENDED THEY WERE INVADED BY HITLER. THEY WELCOMED HIM HOME. HE WAS A LOCAL, AS WAS MOST OF THE SS. SEIG HEIL GREETED HIS INVASION, ALONG WITH CHEERS. (AND BEERS IF NOT CHAMPAGNE). HATED THE PLACE. “JUDEN REIN” AND SWASTIKAS ON MANY WALLS. I’M NOT JEWISH, BUT IT MADE ME THINK PERHAPS ISRAEL SHOULD EXIST. AMERICA, SHOULD, HOWEVER TELL NETANYAHU THAT IF HE DOESN’T STOP THE SETTLEMENTS, NOT FREEZE AND DEFROST AT WHIM, BARGAINING FOR JERUSALEM, WE CUT AID. MILITARY AID. WE’RE THE ONLY ALLY THEY HAVE LEFT. WE AND THEY SHOULD BE IN COURTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS. BUT SO SHOULD PUTIN AND CHINA’S LEADERS. SOMETIMES YOU FOCUS TOO MUCH ON OUR CRIME, THOUGH THERE ARE CERTAINLY PLENTY OF THEM. PUTIN AND CHINA ARE WORSE. PLEASE PROVIDE US A MAP OF THE WORLD WITH EVERYONE’S BASES EVERYWHERE. AND WHO GETS ARMS WHERE. I KNEW CHAVEZ GOT THEM FROM RUSSIA. WILL NEW MAN DO AS WELL. WILL HE BUILD CENSORING INTERNET LINIK TO CUBA STILL? WILL HE STILL BE FRIENDS WITH AHMADINEJAD? NOT SAYING HE SHOULDN’T.