<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; ABC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/tag/abc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>John Stossel, Free at Last</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/06/john-stossel-free-at-last/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/06/john-stossel-free-at-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20/20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Business Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stossel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch's latest hire John Stossel, speaking at a Michigan college:
I quit ABC a couple weeks ago partly because they didn't like what I was doing. They viewed it as too biased.
Yes, ABC promoted Stossel to 20/20 anchor, gave him regular "Give Me a Break" commentary segments and one-hour, factually challenged primetime specials...all because they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch's <a title="TV Newser" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/john_stossel_leaving_abc_for_fox_130603.asp" target="_blank">latest hire</a> John Stossel, <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fox_biz/john_stossel_the_media_leans_left_fox_clearly_leans_right_139356.asp#more">speaking</a> at a Michigan college:</p>
<blockquote><p>I quit <strong>ABC</strong> a couple weeks ago partly because they didn't like what I was doing. They viewed it as too biased.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, <strong>ABC</strong> promoted <a title="Extra!: Give Us a Break" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1133" target="_self">Stossel</a> to <strong>20/20</strong> anchor, gave him regular "Give Me a Break" commentary segments and one-hour, <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1701">factually</a> <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1727">challenged</a> primetime specials...all because they didn't like him. It's scary to think what the network would have done if they <em>did</em> like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/06/john-stossel-free-at-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Journalism Still Exists &#8212; Outside of ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/16/real-journalism-still-exists-outside-of-abc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/16/real-journalism-still-exists-outside-of-abc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John D. Rockefeller IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary L. Landrieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Husseini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Stakeout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While within the power-friendly environs of the corporate-funded Newseum, congressmembers John D. Rockefeller IV, Tim Pawlenty and Mary L. Landrieu probably felt pretty good about their ability to field such softballs from ABC's George Stephanopoulos as "What's the problem with the public health option?"
But upon leaving corporate TV's criticism-free zone, where such lies as Rockefeller's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While within the power-friendly environs of the corporate-funded <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=10058">Newseum</a>, congressmembers John D. Rockefeller IV, Tim Pawlenty and Mary L. Landrieu probably felt pretty good about their ability to field such <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=8560355" target="_blank">softballs</a> from <strong>ABC</strong>'s George Stephanopoulos as "What's the problem with the public health option?"</p>
<p>But upon leaving corporate TV's criticism-free zone, where such <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/05/15/for-the-wapo-its-not-really-a-debt-if-you-borrowed-from-the-elderly/">lies</a> as Rockefeller's statement that "Medicare is gonna start going broke in 2017, which is like the day after tomorrow," pass completely unchallenged, they each were questioned by real-life journalist Sam Husseini of <strong>WashingtonStakeout.com</strong> (<a href="http://www.washingtonstakeout.com/index.php/2009/09/15/senators-deny-insurance-company-money-sways-them/" target="_blank">9/15/09</a>).</p>
<p>Compare the treatment described above with Husseini's calm but determined <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8ZnKhRLPIo" target="_blank">questioning</a> of the pols:<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Sam Husseini:</strong> Health insurance mandates--don't they end up being a subsidy for the insurance companies, because you're mandating that people go out and buy their product?</p>
<p><strong>Mary Landrieu:</strong> ...I'm not carrying water for the insurance companies....</p>
<p><strong>SH:</strong> You say you're not carrying water, but your No. 1 contributor is JP Morgan Chase, PACs and individuals associated.... And you've precluded the Medicare-for-all type option. Why shouldn't somebody conclude that you are doing the bidding of the financial industry?</p></blockquote>
<p>And to Rockefeller's platitude, "Don't worry about the insurance companies. Believe me, we're going to take care of them," Husseini <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYu_sAFyEvM" target="_blank">responds</a> in a most un-Stephanopoulos manner:</p>
<blockquote><p>You say not to worry about the insurance companies, but even though you obviously come from a very wealthy family, you've raised money for your campaigns--the No. 1 sector, according to <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=Career&amp;cid=N00001685" target="_blank">Open Secrets</a>, is finance and insurance. Why shouldn't it be seen that a lot of people in Congress are in effect doing the bidding of the insurance companies?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/09/16/real-journalism-still-exists-outside-of-abc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Way They See the World</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/17/the-way-they-see-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/17/the-way-they-see-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ceci Connolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cokie Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Balz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=12217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big news in the health reform debate is that the White House seems to be willing to give up on the "public option," a government insurance program that would compete with private insurers. Everyone sees this as a big story, but there's something revealing about the way the Washington Post's Ceci Conolly led her piece:
Racing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big news in the health reform debate is that the White House seems to be willing to give up on the "public option," a government insurance program that would compete with private insurers. Everyone sees this as a big story, but there's something revealing about the way the <strong>Washington Post</strong>'s Ceci Conolly <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/16/AR2009081602248_pf.html">led her piece</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Racing to regain control of the health-care debate, two top administration officials signaled Sunday that the White House may be willing to jettison a controversial government-run insurance plan favored by liberals.</p></blockquote>
<p>In Beltay mediaspeak, "regain control" must mean doing something that right-wing Democrats and Republicans want. The <strong>Post</strong>'s Dan Balz already made this recommendation about the public option, writing on August 12, "Some of his staunchest allies believe that course would be prudent and might change the dynamic of the debate in the administration's favor." And on the roundtable segment on <strong>ABC</strong>'s This Week on August 9, host George Stephanopoulos wondered if Obama would accept a watered-down bill in order to break with the "Howard Dean wing of the party." This notion was seconded by panelist Cokie Roberts, with right-wing columnist Peggy Noonan chiming in to say, "Maybe it would be good for the President if the left got absolutely furious about something."</p>
<p>So the health reform debate has shifted even further to the right--exactly where the corporate media wanted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/08/17/the-way-they-see-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA Times Acknowledges Gaping Hole in Media&#039;s Healthcare Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/29/la-times-acknowledges-gaping-hole-in-medias-healthcare-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/29/la-times-acknowledges-gaping-hole-in-medias-healthcare-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isabel Macdonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Rainey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A. Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=11518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An LA Times column today cited FAIR's petition demanding that the TV networks include single-payer in their coverage of the healthcare reform debate,  acknowledging that there is a "gaping hole in much of the media coverage--caused by the failure to  investigate practices around the rest of the world, particularly European-style,  single-payer programs."
The Times' [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <strong>LA Times</strong> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-onthemedia29-2009jul29,0,566995.column">column today</a> cited <a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/592/t/9039/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1993">FAIR's petition</a> demanding that the TV networks include single-payer in their coverage of the healthcare reform debate,  acknowledging that there is a "gaping hole in much of the media coverage--caused by the failure to  investigate practices around the rest of the world, particularly European-style,  single-payer programs."</p>
<p>The <strong>Times</strong>' James Rainey concluded his column, "TV Needs To Deepen Coverage of Healthcare Reform," with a report on the delivery of FAIR's petition at <strong>ABC</strong>--the network that disinvited Obama's longtime physician Dr. David Scheiner, a single-payer advocate, from its June 24 "Prescription for America" program:</p>
<blockquote><p>The liberal media watchdog group Fairness &amp; Accuracy in Reporting and a  group of progressive activists delivered a petition Tuesday to <strong>ABC</strong> News in New  York (which recently excluded one of the activists from a forum on healthcare)  to demand broader reporting, including an assessment of government-managed  health systems.</p>
<p>I suspect some in the big media have tiptoed lightly on  that turf for the same reason as the politicians. Better to appear ill-informed  about the world of healthcare than to appear open to anything, you know,  French.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/07/29/la-times-acknowledges-gaping-hole-in-medias-healthcare-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
