<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fairness &#38; Accuracy In Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>New Cable Show: &#039;I Can&#039;t Believe The Chutzpah&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/new-cable-show-i-cant-believe-the-chutzpah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/new-cable-show-i-cant-believe-the-chutzpah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=2970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogging communications attorney Harold Feld (WetMachine, 11/14/08) thinks he 
missed a class in law school. Not once in my Administrative Law class did my professor ever tell me that you could respond to a federal investigation by telling the agency, "We know you have authority, but we'd rather not answer these questions because you are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=10375">Blogging</a> communications attorney Harold Feld (<strong>WetMachine</strong>, <a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/1385" target="_blank">11/14/08</a>) thinks he </p>
<blockquote><p>missed a class in law school. Not once in my Administrative Law class did my professor ever tell me that you could respond to a federal investigation by telling the agency, "We know you have authority, but we'd rather not answer these questions because you are a great big meany." But then, I'm not working for the cable industry, which has repeatedly shown it has trouble with the concept that federal law really <a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/1193" target="_blank">applies</a> to them, and that the FCC is supposed to be a regulator, not a <a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/385" target="_blank">lap dog</a>.<br />
<!--preview-break--><br />
Today's episode of "I Can't Believe the Chutzpah" comes from the <a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/1380" target="_blank">ongoing</a> investigation by the FCC over whether cable operators are using the <a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/700" target="_blank">confusion</a> around the DTV conversion to push users into buying digital tier service... or just generally violating <a href="http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/1350" target="_blank">the law</a> by changing channel line-ups without notice to either subscribers or local franchise authorities, migrating stuff off basic tier without warning, or charging for additional tiers to get channels required by law to be available on the basic tier.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, "after getting a bunch of consumer <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96311177" target="_blank">complaints</a>... the FCC sent out a bunch of <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.media/CableLOI.pdf" title="PDF" target="_blank">letters of inquiry</a> to the named cable companies" and said "they had two weeks to reply." The cable conglomerates' belligerent response?--they simply "sent a lengthy <a href="http://www.ncta.com/DocumentBinary.aspx?id=769" target="_blank">letter</a> to the FCC explaining that the FCC is not allowed to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/law.ars/2008/11/13/cable-to-fcc-stop-investigating-our-rates" target="_blank">investigate</a> the cable industry."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/new-cable-show-i-cant-believe-the-chutzpah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Math Yields Old Story</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/new-math-yields-old-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/new-math-yields-old-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=2946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Beat the Press: Saying he "might expect it from right-leaning commentators like Will Wilkinson" but not "from someone like Mark Perry, who lives in Flint, Michigan," Felix Salmon of Portfolio notes (11/18/04) that "all of them are perpetuating the meme that the average GM worker costs more than $70 an hour, once you include [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <strong><a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/beat_the_press_archive?month=11&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=the_70_an_hour_fairy_tale#111059" target="_blank">Beat the Press</a></strong>: Saying he "might expect it from right-leaning commentators like <a href="http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/11/17/making-sense-on-detroit/" target="_blank">Will Wilkinson</a>" but not "from someone like <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2008/11/cancer-on-big-three-29hr-pay-gap.html" target="_blank">Mark Perry</a>, who lives in Flint, Michigan," Felix Salmon of<strong> Portfolio</strong> notes (<a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/11/18/the-return-of-the-70-per-hour-meme" target="_blank">11/18/04</a>) that "all of them are perpetuating the meme that the average GM worker costs more than $70 an hour, once you include health and pension costs." Just one problem--"It's not true":<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of <em>retired</em> workers....</p>
<p>As of <a href="http://www.uaw.org/barg/07fact/fact02.php" target="_blank">2007</a>, the <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/unions-arent-booking-themselves-on-tv-shows/">UAW</a> represented 180,681 members at Chrysler, Ford and General Motors; it also represented 419,621 retired members and 120,723 surviving spouses. If you take the costs associated with 721,025 individuals and then divide those costs by the hours worked by 180,681 individuals, you're going to end up with a very large hourly rate. But it won't <em>mean</em> anything, unless you're <em>trying</em> to be deceptive.</p></blockquote>
<p>We take exception to one part of Salmon's otherwise strong debunking. He says, "You certainly wouldn't expect to see it in the <strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/business/economy/18sorkin.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">New York Times</a></strong>." Yeah, <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=9370">we would</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/new-math-yields-old-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversity = Credibility</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/diversity-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/diversity-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=2938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Responding (11/13/08) to those "who would argue that the election of the first African-American president signaled the country has moved past the need to be concerned about racial equity,"  PBS.org's Dori J. Maynard writes that
it is true that some television networks put on air more African-American commentators during the campaign. Those additional voices, however, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding (<a href="http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2008/11/bloggers-demonstrate-the-diffe.html" target="_blank">11/13/08</a>) to those "who <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/06/toward-a-post-racist-future/">would argue</a> that the election of the first African-American president signaled the country has moved past the need to be concerned about racial equity," <!--preview-break--> <strong>PBS.org</strong>'s Dori J. Maynard writes that</p>
<blockquote><p>it is true that some television networks put on air more African-American commentators during the campaign. Those additional voices, however, were not numerous enough to avoid the frequent appearance of all-white panels to discuss race relations. That lamentable <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3597">pattern</a> and other media missteps, such as a <strong>New York Times</strong> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/us/politics/11jackson.html?_r=1&amp;scp=4&amp;sq=jesse%20jackson%20barack%20obama&amp;st=cse&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank">story</a> on the shifting African-American landscape that did not quote any African-American sources, were vivid examples of why the traditional media's reputation and credibility depend on their ability to diversify their ranks as quickly as possible.</p></blockquote>
<p>How far back does this "lamentable pattern" go? See FAIR's magazine <strong>Extra!:</strong> "A Different Race: The Black Press Reveals Gaps in Mainstream Election Coverage" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2020">11-12/04</a>) by Jacqueline Bacon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/21/diversity-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;I Knew He Knew Who I Was&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/20/he-knew-who-i-was/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/20/he-knew-who-i-was/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rendall</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=2933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Beck has been telling a personal story illustrating what he says is a particularly intense level of hatred on the left.
According to the newly signed Fox News host, he was verbally assaulted by a truck driver while standing in line at a Wendy's restaurant at a truck stop.  Writing on his blog, Beck [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Beck has been telling a personal story illustrating what he says is a particularly intense level of hatred on the left.</p>
<p>According to the newly signed <strong>Fox News</strong> host, he was verbally assaulted by a truck driver while standing in line at a Wendy's restaurant at a truck stop. <!-- preview-break --> Writing on <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/18301/">his blog</a>, Beck says the truck driver called him a "racist bigot," blaming the talk show host and conservatives "for everything." Wrote Beck, "The hatred was palpable."  As his security detail stood between him and his assailant, Beck says the truck driver ended his rant by threatening to run him over.</p>
<p>It was ugly stuff, and Beck was shocked by the level of hate: "I wanted to say, I think you have me mistaken for someone else, but I knew he knew who I was and he just hated me for who I was…. Wow. Is this who we've become? Is this who we've become?"</p>
<p>Concluding his appeal to civility, Beck explained that he wouldn't treat his enemies the way the truck driver treated him: "I could stand in line with Michael Moore and I wouldn't say that to him. I would say some things to Michael Moore, but it wouldn't be that. Is this who we've become? I believe there is a cauldron of hatred on both sides, but the left is quite frightening."</p>
<p>Beck might not say such things to Moore <em>in person</em>, but he has expressed a desire to <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2803">murder Moore </a>to his nationally syndicated radio audience (<strong>Glenn Beck Program</strong>, 5/18/05):</p>
<blockquote><p>I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it. No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out--is this wrong?</p></blockquote>
<p>And Beck wasn't exactly the picture of civility two years earlier when he told his listeners that he prayed nightly for anti-war presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich to be <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2803">consumed by fire</a> (<strong>Glenn Beck Program</strong>, 3/16/03): "Every night I get down on my knees and pray that Dennis Kucinich will burst into flames."</p>
<p>Beck repeated his Wendy's story on <strong>Fox</strong>'s <strong>On the Record</strong> (11/17/08)--only in this version, Beck said <strong>Fox News</strong> was among the targets of the truck driver's vitriol. As he explained to host Greta Van Susteren, the story illustrated that "the left is just unbelievably out of control right now."</p>
<p>Whatever the truth is about Beck's truck driver story, his own record of hatred, including a prediction that in 10 years time <a href="http://www.smearcasting.com/">"Muslims and Arabs will be looking through a razor wire fence at the West,"</a> is not merely a matter of angry words spouted in a fast food shop, but a matter of nationally broadcast hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/20/he-knew-who-i-was/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions Aren&#039;t Booking Themselves on TV Shows</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/unions-arent-booking-themselves-on-tv-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/unions-arent-booking-themselves-on-tv-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=2920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "Clout Has Plunged for Automakers and Union, Too," the New York Times' Micheline Maynard makes this curious observation:
[GM CEO Rick ] Wagoner and Ron Gettelfinger, head of the U.A.W., appeared on local TV in Detroit this week, but no Detroit representatives landed spots on the Sunday morning talk shows out of Washington. Senator Levin was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/business/economy/18rescue.html?ref=todayspaper">Clout Has Plunged for Automakers and Union, Too</a>," the <strong>New York Times</strong>' Micheline Maynard makes this curious observation:</p>
<blockquote><p>[GM CEO Rick ] Wagoner and Ron Gettelfinger, head of the U.A.W., appeared on local TV in Detroit this week, but no Detroit representatives landed spots on the Sunday morning talk shows out of Washington. Senator Levin was their primary spokesman on <strong>NBC</strong>'s <strong>Meet the Press</strong> and <strong>Face the Nation</strong> on <strong>CBS</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>While it might be odd for a CEO like Wagoner to have trouble getting on the TV talkshow circuit, the lack of a labor spokesperson on the Sunday shows is pretty much par for the course. It would have actually been <em>really</em> odd for a labor leader to be invited on a network chat show. From <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2822"><strong>Extra!</strong>’s survey</a> of Sunday morning guests in 1995-96 and 1999:</p>
<blockquote><p>Except for presidential candidate Ralph Nader, not a single one of the 364 guests invited during the 19 months studied was an environmentalist or consumer advocate. John Sweeney and Thomas Donahue, candidates for the presidency of the AFL-CIO, were the only guests who were labor leaders. Instead of worker representatives, the shows invited the CEO of United Airlines, the CEO of Continental Airlines, a Goldman Sachs analyst, retired basketball stars and political satirists.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or as <strong>MSNBC</strong> host Chris Matthews once put it:</p>
<blockquote><p>I watch Sunday television.... I never see a really good articulate labor leader on television. What happened to the George Meanys and the Walter Reuthers we grew up with? Where are the strong, articulate voices of the working person, the working family out there? That voice that you're talking about, who worries about trade policy, who worries about tax policy, who worries about being trained for the job, where are those voices on Sunday?</p></blockquote>
<p>And:</p>
<blockquote><p>They don't have speakers. I'm telling you, I can't think right now of a labor leader that could match wits with a Dick Cheney on television. They don't want to get out there and debate like they used to.... Who are the great spokesmen against this administration's trade policies or this administration's tax policies? Who are they?</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, the idea that labor leaders--even those with Cheney-like wit--don't want to be on TV is strange. It's more likely that they're not being asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/unions-arent-booking-themselves-on-tv-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filthy Rich Pundit &#039;Feeling Crankier Than Usual&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/filthy-rich-pundit-feeling-crankier-than-usual/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/filthy-rich-pundit-feeling-crankier-than-usual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Voiles</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=2902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via A Tiny Revolution, a reminder from Vanity Fair website contributor Peter Newcomb (11/14/08) of the unspoken motivations of a bazillionaire pundit writing an enormously influential column on economics:

It would be easy to dismiss today's rant... by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman as yet another ideological tirade against the U.S. automobile industry. But based [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <strong><a href="http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/002698.html" target="_blank">A Tiny Revolution</a></strong>, a reminder from <strong>Vanity Fair</strong> website contributor Peter Newcomb (<a href="http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/002698.html" target="_blank">11/14/08</a>) of the unspoken motivations of a <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=7747">bazillionaire pundit</a> writing an enormously influential column on economics:<br />
<!--preview-break--></p>
<blockquote><p>It would be easy to dismiss today's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/opinion/12friedman.html" target="_blank">rant</a>... by <strong>New York Times</strong> columnist Thomas Friedman as yet <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=9370">another</a> ideological tirade against the U.S. automobile industry. But based on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/business/12property.html?_r=1" target="_blank">bad news</a> coming out of shopping-mall owner General Growth Properties [<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ggp" target="_blank">GGP</a>], it is no wonder Friedman is feeling crankier than usual. That's because the author's wife, Ann (née Bucksbaum), is an heir to the General Growth fortune. In the past year, the couple--who live in an 11,400-square-foot mansion in Bethesda, Maryland--have watched helplessly as General Growth stock has fallen 99 percent, from a high of $51 to a recent 35 cents a share. The assorted Bucksbaum family trusts, once worth a combined $3.6 billion, are now worth less than $25 million.</p></blockquote>
<p>But Newcomb doesn't "expect Friedman to go from Beirut to <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=8177">Jerusalem</a> begging for money. The distinguished columnist... is still said to get at least $50,000 per <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=10367">speaking engagement</a> on top of the millions he makes writing <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&amp;media_view_id=5623">best-sellers</a>."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2008/11/18/filthy-rich-pundit-feeling-crankier-than-usual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
