<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAIR Blog &#187; Media Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/category/media_criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bill O&#039;Reilly vs. Reality on Planned Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/06/bill-oreilly-vs-reality-on-planned-parenthood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/06/bill-oreilly-vs-reality-on-planned-parenthood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=20414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was inevitable that Fox host Bill O'Reilly would weigh in on the Planned Parenthood/Komen Foundation controversy. And perhaps just as inevitable that he'd mangle the facts along the way.

Here he is, on Friday night (2/3/12):
Last year the Komen Foundation gave Planned Parenthood $680,000. Now, that is the source of controversy because as you know, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was inevitable that <strong>Fox</strong> host Bill O'Reilly would weigh in on the Planned Parenthood/Komen Foundation controversy. And perhaps just as <a title="Extra!: The Oh Really? Factor" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1108" target="_self">inevitable</a> that he'd mangle the facts along the way.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="center aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/oreilly-pp.jpg" alt="" hspace="20" width="403" height="257" /></p>
<p>Here he is, on Friday night (<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2012/02/06/bill-oreilly-victory-secular-forces-america#ixzz1lcSAAIGl">2/3/12</a>):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Last year the Komen Foundation gave Planned Parenthood $680,000. Now, that is the source of controversy <strong>because as you know, Planned Parenthood is primarily in business to provide abortions</strong>, more than 300,000 each year.</p>
<p>Later he added:</p>
<blockquote><p>Planned Parenthood does not give women who visit its clinics the other side of the abortion story because again PP is in business for abortion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is Planned Parenthood's breakdown of medical services (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/what-planned-parenthood-actually-does/2011/04/06/AFhBPa2C_blog.html?tid=pm_business_pop">h/t Ezra Klein</a>):<!--preview-break--></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/WashingtonPost/Content/Blogs/ezra-klein/StandingArt/plannedparenthood.jpg?uuid=QJyyvGIBEeCV6ZMHpLzxXw" alt="" width="453" height="285" /></p>
<p>O'Reilly was fortunate enough to book an opposing guest--talk radio host Leslie Marshall--who wasn't prepared to argue this point:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> OK their big business, Planned Parenthood is abortion. And lobbying for abortion, would you concede that?</p>
<p><strong>MARSHALL:</strong> I would concede that they perform abortions and they are politically --</p>
<p>(CROSSTALK)</p>
<p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> No the largest part of their business, the most things that they get involved in concerns abortion, would you concede that.</p>
<p><strong>MARSHALL:</strong> I can't because I've heard a good argument on both sides and information on both sides.</p>
<p>(CROSSTALK)</p>
<p><strong>O'REILLY:</strong> OK, well, all right, there is no good argument. The absolute truth is PP is in business for abortion; 300,000 a year and they make tons of money from it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/06/bill-oreilly-vs-reality-on-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tell ABC: No More Iran Propaganda</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/02/tell-abc-no-iran-propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/02/tell-abc-no-iran-propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=20399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you've read FAIR's latest alert on ABC's Iran propaganda, let ABC know how you feel. And please post your letters/comments in the thread below.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you've read FAIR's latest <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4479">alert</a> on ABC's Iran propaganda, let <strong>ABC</strong> know how you feel. And please post your letters/comments in the thread below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/02/tell-abc-no-iran-propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran: This Is What Propaganda Looks Like</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/01/iran-this-is-what-propaganda-looks-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/01/iran-this-is-what-propaganda-looks-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Clapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Raddatz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=20370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alarmist corporate media coverage of the "threat" from Iran is everywhere, thanks to a Senate appearance yesterday by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.
But Clapper said very little in his remarks that would justify the propagandistic coverage we're seeing.  His main point was that Iran could launch attacks if it felt threatened. It is hard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Alarmist corporate media coverage of the "threat" from Iran is everywhere, thanks to a Senate appearance yesterday by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.</p>
<p>But Clapper said very little in his remarks that would justify the propagandistic coverage we're seeing.  His main point was that Iran could launch attacks if it felt threatened. It is hard to see how this is <a title="Angry Arab: That Impudent Iranian Regime" href="http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2012/02/that-impudent-iranian-regime.html" target="_self">particularly surprising</a>. Clapper pointed to the alleged Iranian plot to kill the Saudi ambassador in Washington D.C. as evidence that Iran seems more eager to assert itself, perhaps even inside the United States. But there were <a title="MERIP: Debunking the Iran &quot;Terror Plot&quot; " href="http://www.merip.org/mero/mero110311" target="_blank">many people</a> who raised <a title="Informed Comment: Is an Iranian Drug Cartel Behind the Assassination Plot against the Saudi Ambassador?" href="http://www.juancole.com/2011/10/is-an-iranian-drug-cartel-behind-the-assassination-plot-against-the-saudi-ambassador.html" target="_self">serious questions</a> about that rather <a title="CSpin: Jasmin Ramsey on Iran plot" href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4419" target="_self">implausible scenario</a> (which involved hiring a Mexican drug gang to carry out the assassination).</p>
<p>As the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577195043674372560.html?mod=ITP_pageone_3">reported</a> (one of the few corporate outlets I saw pushing back against the official alarmism):</p>
<blockquote><p>There is still widespread doubt that an alleged plot to kill the Saudi ambassador was authorized at the highest levels in Tehran, said Karim Sadjadpour, a Middle East analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p>
<p>"If that's the only data point, I think it's a stretch to conclude that the regime is now looking to commit acts of terror on U.S. soil," he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>That kind of caution was in short supply on the network newscasts. <strong>NBC Nightly News</strong> anchor <a title="FAIR Blog: NBC's Investigation of Patriot Act" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/05/31/nbcs-investigation-of-patriot-act/" target="_self">Brian Williams</a> (1/31/12) announced:</p>
<blockquote><p>Iran's threat. Not just the nuclear program. Tonight, U.S. intelligence warns Iran<strong> </strong>may be prepared to strike on American soil.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--><br />
Williams called Clapper's testimony  a "chilling new assessment about the scope of the threat from Iran." As correspondent <a title="FAIR Blog; Rick Perry's Job Swagger" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/08/19/rick-perrys-jobs-swagger/" target="_self">Andrea Mitchell </a>explained,  "Experts warn that the U.S. is even more vulnerable than Israel if Iran retaliates or launches a pre-emptive bomb plot.... Soft U.S. targets like embassies throughout the Persian Gulf, and 90,000 American troops in Afghanistan, next door to Iran."</p>
<p>It wasn't until the end of Mitchell's report that any notes of caution were sounded:</p>
<blockquote><p>Still, intelligence officials told the Senate today they don't think Iran has taken the final step, deciding to build a bomb. But Israel does think Iran has crossed that red line, and U.S. officials say if attacked, Iran would not hesitate to retaliate against both Israel and the U.S.</p></blockquote>
<p>So Iran is a substantial threat, though then again it might not even be developing the weapons the U.S. and Israel claim are in the works. And really, the "threat" seems mostly that Iran might be ready to respond to an attack on its country--something virtually any country in the world would do.</p>
<p>But for sheer propaganda value, <strong>ABC World News</strong>'<strong> </strong>January 31 broadcast would be tough to top.</p>
<p>First, start with alarming graphic:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/sawyer-growing-threat.jpg" alt="" width="390" height="218" /></p>
<p>Then Pentagon correspondent <a title="FAIR Blog: Martha Raddatz, Insider War Correspondent" href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/11/14/martha-raddatz-insider-war-correspondent/" target="_self">Martha Raddatz</a> announced, "The saber rattling from Iran has been constant."</p>
<p>Match that with threatening B-roll footage from the enemy country. Weapons  on display at a military parade, for instance:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/abc-iran-weapons.jpg" alt="" width="388" height="221" /></p>
<p>Iran "may be more ready than ever to launch terror attacks in the United States," Raddatz explained. Cue footage of apparently menacing soldiers:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/abc-iran-soldiers.jpg" alt="" width="392" height="220" /></p>
<p>Don't forget to show the enemy county's leader (or, rather, a <a title="Wikipedia: Supreme Leader of Iran" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Leader_of_Iran" target="_blank">close approximation</a>) meeting with other Official Enemies. Like this:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/abc-iran-chavez.jpg" alt="" width="391" height="222" /></p>
<p>And why not one more, while reminding viewers that such figures "have little love for the U.S.":</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.fair.org/images/abc-iran-castro.jpg" alt="" width="391" height="218" /></p>
<p>It's important to remember, amidst all this hoopla, that it is U.S. military officials and the president who have regularly threatened that "no options" are "off the table" in dealing with Iran. That is code for using nuclear weapons--and Barack Obama's <a title="The Hill: 'No options off the table' in dealing with Iran, Obama warns" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/206349-obama-touts-his-foreign-policy-accomplishments" target="_blank">latest repetition</a> of that apocalyptic threat got a standing ovation from Congress.</p>
<p>It is hard to argue honestly that the real escalation  is coming from the Iranian side. But that's what propaganda is for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/02/01/iran-this-is-what-propaganda-looks-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shameless Self-Promotion on NBC Nightly &#039;News&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/01/30/shameless-self-promotion-on-nbc-nightly-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/01/30/shameless-self-promotion-on-nbc-nightly-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lester Holt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=20336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No comment.
NBC Nightly News (1/29/12)
LESTER HOLT:
And a sign of the times tonight on a football field in Hawaii. The NFL is relaxing its strict social media policy and allowing players to use Twitter to interact with fans during the Pro Bowl in Honolulu. There'll be one designated computer on each sideline, no smartphones allowed. Players [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comment.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>NBC Nightly News</strong> (1/29/12)</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>LESTER HOLT:</strong></p>
<p>And a sign of the times tonight on a football field in Hawaii. The NFL is relaxing its strict social media policy and allowing players to use <strong>Twitter</strong> to interact with fans during the Pro Bowl in Honolulu. There'll be one designated computer on each sideline, no smartphones allowed. Players will be tweeting with the hashtag probowl.<strong> And by the way, you can catch the game coming up next, here on NBC.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><!--preview-break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/01/30/shameless-self-promotion-on-nbc-nightly-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

