It's always difficult to report on someone's death. If they've had a lifetime of accomplishments, how do you sum that up in a few brief paragraphs? When a life has been cut cruelly short, it's even worse–trying hopelessly to convey the sense of lost possibilities.
With Aaron Swartz, who died on January 11, reportedly by his own hand, you have the worst of both worlds: At the age of 26, he had already achieved so much in so many different arenas as to baffle an obituary writer: taking part in creating the RSS protocol when he was 14 years old, working on the Creative Commons licensing system, helping to launch the social media site Reddit, promoting the Open Library to facilitate book access, co-founding the civil liberties group Demand Progress. But the crushing realization that his death brought was that everything Aaron had done so far was just the prelude to what he would have gone on to do.
Tributes to Aaron by those who knew him well–Cory Doctorow, Lawrence Lessig, Quinn Norton–give a glimpse of the absolutely irreplaceable way that Aaron saw the world. His skills, his vision, his energy, his generosity: There was no one else who had that combination. And now no one does.
Whatever personal demons Aaron struggled with, the responsibility for his death lies with a criminal system that prosecuted him with neither mercy nor justice for an act of civil disobedience: downloading articles en masse from JSTOR, a nonprofit group that serves to safeguard the profits of the corporations with a stranglehold on scholarly publishing.
The system by which publishers extort astronomical fees for access to knowledge they didn't create is indeed unconscionable, as was U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz's response to Aaron's challenge to it: threatening him with 35 years in prison and a million dollar fine, under the theory that "stealing is stealing, whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or dollars."
The Obama administration can forgive torturers, and it can forgive financial fraud that brought an economy to its knees. Trying to liberate information, it seems, is the one crime it's unable to forgive.
Among many other things, Aaron was a terrific media critic, and Extra! is proud to have published a couple of his pieces. His article "Rachel Carson, Mass Murderer?," from September/October 2007, debunked the canard that concern over the environmental effects of pesticides is responsible for millions of human deaths. (The New Yorker's Caleb Crain, in an appreciation of Aaron–1/13/13–called the piece "intelligent and heartfelt," saying it helped him start thinking of its author as "a new kind of public intellectual.") You can hear Aaron discussing his Rachel Carson piece on CounterSpin (10/12/07).
The other piece Aaron wrote for us was "Is Undercover Over?" (Extra!, 3-4/08), about establishment media's disparagement of the use of undercover reporting to expose serious wrongdoing. Aaron came out strongly for the right to go under the radar to serve the public good–a principle that I suspect he would still stand by, despite the world of trouble it landed him in.



I’ve spent much of the past 24 hours reading remembrances of Aaron Swartz as well as a wide selection of his writings.
We’ve lost an important voice. Not only was he uniquely able to wrap his head around the vast complexity of the emerging digital landscape, Aaron Swartz was generous and brave. He threatened the keepers of the status quo and paid the ultimate price.
Depending on how history turns out, Aaron Swartz may be the first hero of our future age.
And here is a link to a reader i made with a number of documents by and about Aaron Swartz
One thing the criminal justice system won't abide, is a challenge to the status quo. Very sad, sober commentary on a tragic loss.
RIP Aaron Swartz. http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-1986-2013/
[...] Obama admin forgives torturers. Aaron Swartz wanted to free information; that was unforgiveable. @jnaureckas writes:http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-1986-2013/ … [...]
I heard about it from Wiki, a couple of days ago; this make no sense from any angle.
I think it does point out the current Corporate ownership of the media is a poor return on the investment of "freedom and rights"; as Ben Says, Those who trade one for the other, get and desire neither.
[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-1986-2013/. [...]
[...] a release today from the Institute for Public Accuracy (1/17/13) on the legacy of Aaron Swartz, I came across a link to a great essay by Richard Stallman that appears to have been written about [...]
[...] a release today from the Institute for Public Accuracy (1/17/13) on the legacy of Aaron Swartz, I came across a link to a great essay by Richard Stallman that appears to have been written about [...]
I thought you promised the things you did a long time ago during 9/11 and that shows that you don't care about others but your go damn self. Barrack Obama is helping out the community and all you republicans doing is nothing but an asshole to everything else. You know what go back to highschool and learn about history AGAIN and stop being rude!
http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-1986-2013/
Sign this Whitehouse petition to make the DOJ accountable for Aaron Swartz death https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/appoint-independent-investigator-subpoena-power-investigate-instances-doj-bullying-extorsion-and/ZrDymCLq
Unfortunately, 'stealing is stealing'—-and if Mr. Swartz were truly a dedicated activist, he would be awaiting trial on his"crimes" that he willingly conducted in his "words" for his beliefs; instead of being mourned for having taken his own life.
The fact that he commited a crime knowingly and was even either arrogant of foolish enough to leave behind a computer that could be traced to him—-is yet one more indicator of his lack of abolute dedication to his 'supposed cause'——and if he was not old enough to remember the old addage "don't do the crime; if you can't do the time" his own actions—-suicide; reveal his lack of commitment—or at best; he was not who he wanted others to believe that he was.
Either way; offering a salutation to him for his lack of "true" dedication is a waste of intelligence—-and his suicide—-was a mockery of those who ARE dedicated.
If anything he is a negative example for anyone who may observe.
It's a telling story how much mental health quest needed in our modern world. It seems a mental health awareness system needed, Young under 30, in particular, need special trained psychologists with systematic social helping setup. Suicide and gun violence both tragedies have shocked the society in recent years. Alberta government sent $3 million to University of Alberta in dealing with mental health issue recently.
Start educating the concept of "jury nullification." Yes, Aarron likely broke the law but it takes a jury to convict or acquit! The DOJ can prosecute all they like but if a jury doesn't WANT to apply the law in a particular case and won't vote "guilty," the accused walks!