With gasoline prices again approaching $4 a gallon, Mr. Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, is also trying to merge energy and economic policy in a way that will make voters see increased energy production as a pocketbook issue.
Note that Lipton and Krauss don't say that increased U.S. energy production will actually affect the $4-a-gallon price of gas and hence the voters' pocketbooks; that would be inaccurate, since oil is a global commodity and it's impossible for the U.S. to increase its production enough to change it substantially. In fact, with the formulation "in a way that will make voters see," the Times reporters suggest that they are well aware that increased oil drilling will not actually alter gas prices–that this is a matter of changing public perceptions, not economic realities.
But then, Lipton and Krass don't do anything in their piece to let the reader know that the implied connection between increased drilling and lower gas prices is fraudulent. They're like savvy audience members at a magic show, able to see how the tricks are done but choosing not to give away the secrets to those who are taken in.
"In a way that will make voters see" is the wink, Lipton and Krauss's way of showing that they don't actually believe rabbits can magically appear in hats, even as they allow most of their readers to persist in that delusion.