Elizabeth Jensen has a preview (New York Times, 1/8/12) of the new Bill Moyers program coming to public television stations later this month–a show that is not being distributed by PBS. Why not? She reports:
Mr. Moyers said he was unsure why PBS, where he has spent most of his career since 1971, declined the show for its main schedule. Some public television executives, who would not publicly comment on a sensitive issue, said they believed that PBS did not want to realign itself with Mr. Moyers, a longtime target of some conservatives, as it was fighting to keep its federal financing.
Perhaps PBS might consider a new, more accurate slogan: Not Offending Conservatives When We're Fighting for Funding, Which Is Always.
In the piece, Moyers seems happy with the situation, saying that "we don't have to worry about somebody at PBS losing sleep over the fact that David Stockman says the Republicans have lost their minds on taxes."
And Jensen adds:
His return comes as public television executives are debating their path: More Downton Abbey, or local and national news? So far, public affairs programming is losing. PBS canceled Now when Bill Moyers Journal ended; the replacement show Need to Know was recently trimmed from one hour to 30 minutes.
Yet, Mr. Moyers noted, PBS announced an additional version of Antiques Roadshow just a few weeks after the Census Bureau released figures showing the number of people living in poverty had risen to more than 46 million.
"I love Antiques Roadshow," he added. "But it is just symbolic of how we're not connected viscerally to the state of the American people right now."


I confess I like Downton Abbey.
But I believe in Bill Moyers and the important discussion that he brings to the USA starved for intelligence in its national discourse.
I am changing my will and will NOT be leaving any money I have to PBS. Shame on them.
BZ
Gordon, I'm happy you wrote some good words, though I disagree with you about the thesis.
OWS did have its moments of 60s style tub-thumping in the park, but there was precisely no effect on the politics, no candidate, no demands, a lot of arrests/hefty fines of protestors and overtime for steroidal head-bashers. What is radical about that? What is radical about the continued hegemony of bankers and weapons salesmen? Talk, and viewpoints, and "opposition" cannot be said to exist but in the befouled air if they cannot demonstrate a single effect in our social reality.
"Religious" folk do not get an exemption for being "for" the poor – they are part of a common impulse to believe in nonsense, and choose to align themselves with baseless and pernicious insitutions that foster racism, sexism, irrationalism, classism, wastes of gargantuan amounts of money and time. I understand the sacrifices the hero Wobblies went through, the deaths and the oppression – did the Popes come to their aid?
Thanks for listening – as I said, FAIR is corporate-foundation funded, and is chasing its own tail at the moment.
Bill Moyers, like Walter Cronkite, has been a guiding light in television journalism for many years.
If he's to be scorned then I'm happy he's wearing it as a badge of honor. As a former television journalist myself I know I would.
It isn't when you're getting offers from every network news agency that you should be worried these days.
It's when you're so controversial because you're the only journalist out there who's willing to put their neck out and tell the truth and risk getting fired over it that you should be satisfied.
It means you have integrity and that really is a rare commodity in journalism these days.
My income has increased and I had decided to begin supporting PBS again; however, upon learning of your decision not to carry Bill Moyers, I have determined that I cannot support your station. I will be advisng my friends and aquaintences of your decision.
Regards,
Francene Blanchard
Until I was a canadian living in america, i would never have understood what john piety meant in his comment above. but it is absolutely true. I never saw much accurate or conclusive indepth reporting on world or (canadian) news until I returned home to Canada. All I could conclude was the same as John, the programming was just propaganda to dumb down America … and it has worked. Outrageously biased, untruthful and twisted for their own purposes …. so proud to be Canadian …