The Washington Post reports today on a one day walkout by public sector workers:
The strikes are the first major uprising over the Conservative-led governmentâ┚¬Ã¢”ž¢s ambitious plans to slash $128 billion in spending over the next four years.
I don't know how one defines "major uprising," but on March 26 hundreds of thousands hit the streets to protest the government's austerity plans. The Post didn't find them terribly newsworthy when they happened, running a brief item alongside other international news.


[...] WaPo Discovers UK Anti-Austerity Protests [...]
But let two dixiePublicans fart in the Grand Canyon and it is WaPo FRONT PAGE. Go figure.
You could probably also include the student protests of last fall in this gestalt. I would think the WaPo would have noticed them, since at one point they intruded on the ability of Real People (Prince Charles and Camilla) to have a pleasant evening.
But the public servants could actually bring down our toady "government" of AIRSTRIP ONE.
[...] UK Uncut, Washington Post Posted in Media Criticism | Permalink | Trackback | [...]
Anti austerity?That term is a funny one to be sure.How bout they call themselves" PRO" SPENDING LIKE A DRUNKEN SAILOR. Being for something is always better don't ya think?
Hey Michael E., (July 3, 0655),
My first reaction to your reply was "what an anti-truth statement", but in the spirit of positve-ness that you reccommend, my follow up thought was "what an ignoramus".
I suggest you inform yopurself first, then formulate a response.
Average folks, armed with some knowledge, are quite properly outraged by being forced by their various governments to "pay" for the economic fialures and downright thievery of the economic elite. Talk about spending like a drunken sailor!
So how about some pro austerity for that bunch?
Their is no need for austerity on- you…. me ….the rich….. or the poor, as long as we are talking about OUR MONEY!!!!!Dont tell me how to spend MY MONEY!None of your Goddamn business how anybody's money is spent.The government is begging people to spend as you lay like a spider in wait ready to blame them if they do.And average folks or anybody with a modem of intelligence understands the blame for this economic failure lays squarely on the government.Not those who have accomplished much and already pay the majority of ALL taxes.Take your idiotic class warfare and socialistic statements and go pound sand.You have no idea what you are talking about.The rich the rich the rich.Take everything they have and you will buy but a little time.YOU CANNOT TAX YOUR WAY CLEAR of this one.The rich are a mindless scape goats for the liberal [power grab.Why not just make it the Jews.That seems to work for socialists all to well.
I was planning to keep silent on michael e's comment (is he not the guy who asked us to "name an Arab we can trust"?). But I can't. I won't go into the substance of what he says, but only in how he says it.
Michael e is clearly a disturbed person. Not because he is conservative, but because his inability to write clearly bespeakes — betrays — an inability to think clearly. He seems to write from a "hot" impulse, his fingers flying over his keyboard with a hysterical drive that shows a lack of patience with other people — especially those with whom he seems to disagree — clearly on display.
Anger comes to him far too easily, and too easily he feels the need to throw it as one would in a hydrochloric acid attack. I think Mr. "e" simply does not like us progressives and is too angry with the fact of this forurm to simply and patiently write his disagreements in a fashion that suggest a respect for other people, as well as command of his own beliefs.
Folks, it is clear. Mr. "e" is angry because we exist and because we express ourselves. Read again his comment; it is not thoughtful. It is merely rightist diatribe, projectile-vomited from his computer without even the benefit of the self-editing required for the sake of clearly written English. He writes only to unleash his rage; and hits the "Submit Comment" button as fast as his overwhelming impatience with us can carry his hand to the mouse for that pleasure-releasing "click". There is nothing Mr. "e" would have us know — except how much he seems to despise us.
And at the top his lungs, if that were possible.
The comments from "michael e" display an attitude we often see in the right wing that i find puzzling. It's the "don't tell me how to spend my money" sentiment. Expressed more explicitly, it's the "taxation is theft" meme. It doesn't take much imagination to see that the consequences of this idea, were it actually played-out in the real world, would be disastrous. A world where a few accumulate all the wealth of a society existed at one time, but it was prior to the introduction of modern democracy. We've seen since then that a more equitable distribution of wealth produces a society that is both richer and more sustainable, and which benefits all, including its wealthier members. It's like the Monopoly game: the economy is most vigorous when the wealth is more evenly distributed. Eventually, wealth accumulates in a few hands, but the overall economy suffers as a result. A sustainable economy needs to find a way of pushing wealth back down, to maintain the vitality of the system. One way to do this is through taxation; another is higher wages (unions!). The defenders of the rich don't get this.
Since we in the United States no longer have a manufacturing base, consumer spending is the only thing that drives our economy. Millions are unemployed and millions more work only part time. Ergo, the economy has stopped growing.