"Connecticut is closing out its most activist, liberal legislative session in memory," Peter Applebome reports in the New York Times (6/8/11), with "the largest tax increase in Connecticut history" as the centerpiece of his case.
"They decided to tear up the antitax, budget-slashing, confront-the-unions script that has characterized state legislative sessions elsewhere," Applebome writes, noting that "Republicans say the last five months of lawmaking have been a liberal joy ride and a capitulation to the state's powerful unions…. 'Their solution is to tax the wealthy in Fairfield County, redistribute income and hope people in Greenwich and Darien donâ┚¬Ã¢”ž¢t move to Florida,' said Christopher Healy, the state Republican Party chairman." The reporter quotes a conservative newspaper's assertion that "the state of Connecticut has left the gravitational pull of planet Earth."
Applebome quotes some Democrats defending themselves as well, but he paints a vivid picture of a very controversial budget approach. Then he gets around to describing it: "The Legislature adopted a $40.1 billion budget that relies on $1.4 billion in tax increases, about $800 million in cuts and a projected $1.6 billion in union concessions on pay and benefits over two years." Union concessions are cuts, right? So he's really saying that the budget includes $1.4 billion in new taxes and roughly $1.6 billion this year in cuts. That's not exactly tearing up the budget-slashing, anti-union script–that's about a 4 percent cut in the state budget, largely at the expense of unions.
This is the plan that the New York Times thinks merits the (print) subhead "Connecticut Shifts to the Left."
What would help readers put this piece in context would be a sense of who was paying taxes before the tax increase. According to the invaluable "Who Pays?" report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (11/09), in Connecticut the highest tax rate was paid by the poorest 20 percent, with these taxpayers handing over 12 percent of their income to state and local government. The richest 1 percent, meanwhile, paid 6.5 percent of their income in state and local taxes.
I very much doubt that the Connecticut legislature doubled taxes on the wealthy, but if they had, then the state would be the kind of far-out left-wing socialist utopia where the rich are expected to pay about as much of their incomes as the poor to support schools, police and fire departments.


Well, the Times got one thing right.
It is indeed the doin's of 21st century "liberals", isn't it? The sort that don't fret about "defending themselves" from the people being screwed by their betrayal, only the reactionaries who label anything short of Walkerismo "class warfare".
If only.
[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2011/06/09/connecticut-lurches-left-from-the-nyts-center-right-pov/ . [...]
[...] Connecticut, Peter Applebome Posted in Budget, New York Times, Taxes | Permalink | Trackback | [...]
Connecticut State Employee Unions are voting this week on whether or not to accept a negotiated concessions package. I intend to hold my nose and vote "Yes" – to agree with the concessions. I would like like to vote "No, Because…" – but that is not an option. The concessions two years ago froze wages, now we get another two years of freeze. Job security – except for program changes and department closures. Dubious Health Plan savings – more likely just profitable fees for the insurance companies. The "Liberal" Governor is threatening to gut state services, including state schools. Except UConn (and Husky Athletics) is a sacred cow – immune from any reorganization and still ripe for patronage jobs. Not to mention the proposed UConn Health Center expansion for corporate medical and pharmaceutical research. And the additional Airport management bureaucracy. And additional State financed Magnet schools. And some highway, busway, and rail construction of questionable need. No real opportunity for streamlining state agencies. Ethics and election oversight handicapped. Plus additional taxes targeting the middle class. So, I'd like to vote "No" until I see more realistic fiscal and policy proposals. I may be a State employee, but I'm not crazy – I'll vote Yes to lessen Wisconsin-style cuts in Connecticut.
Did I just actually read that the poor in Ct pay 20% in taxes, while the rich pay 6.5 %?.Of course you are talking state and local taxes,and you are talking fuzzy math.Believe me when you buy a million dollar home after making 300K you ARE NOT paying less than a poor person with a 80 thousand dollar home who makes 15 k.You have to play some serious mind and math games to arrive at that.And of course income taxes well…….. Come on.Look tax loopholes should be closed.But my question is always the same.HOW MUCH OF THE TOTAL WOULD YOU HAVE THE TOP !10% PAY?With all taxes now standing loaded, including Dem proposed taxes ,you are nearing 70cents on every dollar gone.Folks can you say non sustainable?Look if I discover a new form of fuel made out of water and sand that fuels everything and I make 15 trillion dollars…….that is not an opening for Dems to confiscate for redistribution whatever amount they want.On the front end that just stops people from creating and shooting for the moon.
C'mon, Michael E. –You know that poor people pay far more of their incomes in sales and other consumption taxes, and that after they've paid for the gas to get to work–including the taxes on it, they don't have anything left over for that 15 million dollar home. If you earn a lot of money, you have a lot that doesn't have to be spent on highly taxed necessities. It's not about fuzzy math at all; it's about a tax system that is regressive in dozens of places and only progressive with respect to income taxes if you take advantage of no loopholes and don't make use of any capital gains taxes. Submit to reality.
WILLIAM CIBES Hartford Courant 3/7/10
The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy says that in Connecticut non-elderly taxpayers with the lowest family incomes (less than $26,000 annually) pay on average 12 percent of their income for state and local taxes. The richest 1 percent pay only 6.5 percent of their family income for these taxes â┚¬” and because they can deduct these taxes on their federal tax returns, the net cost to these families, with family income greater than $1.355 million annually, is about 4.9 percent of their incomes.
"With all taxes now standing loaded, including Dem proposed taxes ,you are nearing 70 cents on every dollar gone."
Wrong again. The actual imaginary number is 62%, and that's the top marginal rate, not the effective rate.
Stepen Moore of the WSJ, who is known for unreliable number crunching, made it up
The only thing more disgusting than the Rich whining about taxes, are middle class working people
agreeing with them. The Rich are taxed now at some of the lowest rates for their income in history!
The U.S. also has the lowest Corporate Tax rate in the Industrial World. And still the WHINING!