<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burqa Ban: Coverage of a Law to &#039;Free&#039; Women Leaves Them Voiceless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CNN&#8217;s Roland Martin: &#8216;Organized Religion&#8217; Is Desperately Sexist &#124; News Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/comment-page-1/#comment-130124</link>
		<dc:creator>CNN&#8217;s Roland Martin: &#8216;Organized Religion&#8217; Is Desperately Sexist &#124; News Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=15137#comment-130124</guid>
		<description>[...] different than Muslims putting their women in burqas and not letting them drive. (Actually, on CNN Martin declared the need for cultural &quot;respect&quot; and hedged on a burqa ban in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] different than Muslims putting their women in burqas and not letting them drive. (Actually, on CNN Martin declared the need for cultural &quot;respect&quot; and hedged on a burqa ban in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNN&#8217;s Roland Martin: &#8216;Organized Religion&#8217; Is Desperately Sexist &#171; News &#171; @griffinrc</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/comment-page-1/#comment-130107</link>
		<dc:creator>CNN&#8217;s Roland Martin: &#8216;Organized Religion&#8217; Is Desperately Sexist &#171; News &#171; @griffinrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=15137#comment-130107</guid>
		<description>[...] different than Muslims putting their women in burqas and not letting them drive. (Actually, on CNN Martin declared the need for cultural &quot;respect&quot; and hedged on a burqa ban in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] different than Muslims putting their women in burqas and not letting them drive. (Actually, on CNN Martin declared the need for cultural &quot;respect&quot; and hedged on a burqa ban in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grrrlygrl</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/comment-page-1/#comment-60531</link>
		<dc:creator>grrrlygrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 05:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=15137#comment-60531</guid>
		<description>I personally do think that forcing a woman to cover her body IS misogynistic. That being said, forcing a woman to remove her clothing or change her traditions is just as bad. 

telling women to &#039;rebel against tradition&#039; implies that they are not already do so. It also takes away the power and symbolic importance of the action if they DO decide to remove their burqas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally do think that forcing a woman to cover her body IS misogynistic. That being said, forcing a woman to remove her clothing or change her traditions is just as bad. </p>
<p>telling women to &#039;rebel against tradition&#039; implies that they are not already do so. It also takes away the power and symbolic importance of the action if they DO decide to remove their burqas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirth Gersen</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/07/16/burqa-ban-coverage-of-a-law-to-free-women-leaves-them-voiceless/comment-page-1/#comment-36396</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirth Gersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=15137#comment-36396</guid>
		<description>&quot;I suggest that one talks to a Muslim woman wearing a burqa before making any stupid statements that they are &#039;forced&#039;.&quot;

Easier said than done! I&#039;ve never been able to get a woman in a burqa to ackowledge my existence in any way, much less actually speak to me. I&#039;ve been threatened by their escorts, however. 

And I find it interesting that the people clamoring on about womens&#039; right to veils have no problem at all with Muslims demanding that the topfree women on French beaches cover up, because they &quot;offend Islam.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;I suggest that one talks to a Muslim woman wearing a burqa before making any stupid statements that they are &#039;forced&#039;.&#034;</p>
<p>Easier said than done! I&#039;ve never been able to get a woman in a burqa to ackowledge my existence in any way, much less actually speak to me. I&#039;ve been threatened by their escorts, however. </p>
<p>And I find it interesting that the people clamoring on about womens&#039; right to veils have no problem at all with Muslims demanding that the topfree women on French beaches cover up, because they &#034;offend Islam.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

