<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friedman&#039;s Wisdom: CEOs Want to Pay Even Less Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:38:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: March 2010 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-39198</link>
		<dc:creator>March 2010 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13799#comment-39198</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/ . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/</a> . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wise &#8216;Record Of Agenda&#8217; &#171; A Yappy Trade Barrier</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-13801</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wise &#8216;Record Of Agenda&#8217; &#171; A Yappy Trade Barrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13799#comment-13801</guid>
		<description>[...] FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Friedman&#8217;s Wisdom: CEOs Want to Pay Even Less Tax. -by Jim Naureckas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Friedman&#039;s Wisdom: CEOs Want to Pay Even Less Tax. -by Jim Naureckas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-13564</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13799#comment-13564</guid>
		<description>This situation brings up an interesting dilemma. 

Take a smaller scale economy at your nearby corner market.  Say you own a nice cozy neighborhood Cafe.  Next door a Verizon Kiosk opens, with 1/5 of the rental space that you use - this and other similar franchises drive up rental prices.  Your lease is now due, and there is a big jump in the monthly rent.  You will not be able to survive with this increase.  So you decide to close, because nobody will be paying $5 for cup of coffee to offset the new leasing price.

The community loses it&#039;s lifestyle - the cozy local neighborhood, the &quot;comfort&quot; zone.  The appeal that may make this area distinct is gone.  This sort of changing landscape is similar to when Wal-Mart moves into a neighborhood.

How to account for businesses that provide value for the greater good &quot;society&quot;?  vs. businesses that obey competitive rules?  I don&#039;t think Game Theory explains this situation, but would be interested if anyone could shed light on this economic model.    - Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This situation brings up an interesting dilemma. </p>
<p>Take a smaller scale economy at your nearby corner market.  Say you own a nice cozy neighborhood Cafe.  Next door a Verizon Kiosk opens, with 1/5 of the rental space that you use &#8211; this and other similar franchises drive up rental prices.  Your lease is now due, and there is a big jump in the monthly rent.  You will not be able to survive with this increase.  So you decide to close, because nobody will be paying $5 for cup of coffee to offset the new leasing price.</p>
<p>The community loses it&#039;s lifestyle &#8211; the cozy local neighborhood, the &#034;comfort&#034; zone.  The appeal that may make this area distinct is gone.  This sort of changing landscape is similar to when Wal-Mart moves into a neighborhood.</p>
<p>How to account for businesses that provide value for the greater good &#034;society&#034;?  vs. businesses that obey competitive rules?  I don&#039;t think Game Theory explains this situation, but would be interested if anyone could shed light on this economic model.    &#8211; Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Schultz</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/03/03/friedmans-wisdom-ceos-want-to-pay-even-less-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-13447</link>
		<dc:creator>M Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13799#comment-13447</guid>
		<description>I think Mike nailed it. I subscribe to an investment newsletter 
and they are recommending, not investing in The USA, 
but CHINA, unbelievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mike nailed it. I subscribe to an investment newsletter<br />
and they are recommending, not investing in The USA,<br />
but CHINA, unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

