Former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura, doing press for his new TV show on "conspiracy theories," made got some attention from (among others) Eric Roper at the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Roper alludes to a "curious comment Ventura made in the Los Angeles Times this weekend"-- that MSNBC canceled his short-lived show when they found out that he opposed the Iraq War:

I was basically silenced. When I came out of office, I was the hottest commodity out there. There was a bidding war between CNN, Fox and MSNBC to get my services. MSNBC ultimately won. I was being groomed for a five-day-a-week TV show by them. Then, all of a sudden, weird phone calls started happening: "Is it true Jesse doesn't support the war in Iraq?"

Roper writes that MSNBC's decision would be an "odd one since they are considered liberal." Except for the fact that the same cable channel canceled its highest-rated program for the same reason, as FAIR noted in 2003:

MSNBC canceled Phil Donahue's talkshow after an internal memo (leaked to the All Your TV website, 2/25/03) argued that he would be a "difficult public face for NBC in a time of war.... He seems to delight in presenting guests who are anti-war, anti-Bush and skeptical of the administration's motives." The report warned that the Donahue show could be "a home for the liberal anti-war agenda at the same time that our competitors are waving the flag at every opportunity."

Amanda Hess, a blogger for Washington City Paper, wrote a sharp deconstruction (11/30/09) of Chicago Tribune advice columnist Amy "Ask Amy" Dickinson's victim-blaming response (11/27/09) to  a woman who wanted to know whether she was a victim of rape:

Were you a victim? Yes.

First, you were a victim of your own awful judgment.

Hess points out Dickinson's disparate treatment of victim and perpetrator:

You don’t say whether the guy was also drunk. If so, his judgment was also impaired.

Or as Hess translates: "Your judgment was 'awful'; your rapist's judgment was merely 'impaired.'"

The most stunning part of the advice column, though, was when Dickinson urged the letter-writer to give the man who raped her a call:

You must involve the guy in question in order to determine what happened and because he absolutely must take responsibility and face the consequences for his actions, just as you are prepared to do.

Hess responds to this "destructive, dangerous, and negligent" advice:

Obviously, rapists should not be consulted on questions of consent. As this column makes clear, we should all probably refrain from consulting Ask Amy as well.

UPDATE: Those interested in asking Amy Dickinson to retract the advice in her November 27 column can sign a petition that does so here.