<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Frontiers in Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:38:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: December 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-39318</link>
		<dc:creator>December 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13406#comment-39318</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Sellers</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-10785</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Sellers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13406#comment-10785</guid>
		<description>I called Editor Bob Mong and he insists this story has been miscontrued, that the advertising department is being held more accountable to sell ads for the sports and entertainment pages.

As a former journalist I saw obvious advertising influence at papers where the editorial and advertising departments were strictly separated (but certainly  not equal, believe me).  I have been disgusted in the increasing lapdog tack so many so-called journalists take.  I understand the conflicts of interests between the editorial and advertising, but I say the more tension between them, the better.  The advertising department should be frustrated that an advertising pulled an ad because of a negative story--it&#039;s not the editorial department&#039;s job to protect advertisers.  Instead of trying to influence reporters to bury stories perhaps advertising sales personnel should encourage their clients to be ethical instead of corrupt, compassionate instead of cruel.  Then there&#039;d be no problem.

I encouraged Mr. Mong to contact FAIR to discuss where this story allegedly went wrong.  We&#039;ll see if he does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called Editor Bob Mong and he insists this story has been miscontrued, that the advertising department is being held more accountable to sell ads for the sports and entertainment pages.</p>
<p>As a former journalist I saw obvious advertising influence at papers where the editorial and advertising departments were strictly separated (but certainly  not equal, believe me).  I have been disgusted in the increasing lapdog tack so many so-called journalists take.  I understand the conflicts of interests between the editorial and advertising, but I say the more tension between them, the better.  The advertising department should be frustrated that an advertising pulled an ad because of a negative story--it&#039;s not the editorial department&#039;s job to protect advertisers.  Instead of trying to influence reporters to bury stories perhaps advertising sales personnel should encourage their clients to be ethical instead of corrupt, compassionate instead of cruel.  Then there&#039;d be no problem.</p>
<p>I encouraged Mr. Mong to contact FAIR to discuss where this story allegedly went wrong.  We&#039;ll see if he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Latimer</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-10697</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Latimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13406#comment-10697</guid>
		<description>That &quot;vaunted wall&quot; never really existed, at least not as a stable structure, did it?  Content has always been in great degree dictated by business considerations in the corpress, hasn&#039;t it?

Of course, it didn&#039;t use to be that the front section of a paper looked more like an advertising supplement.

It&#039;s like the old joke ...

&quot;The food&#039;s terrible ... and such small portions.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#034;vaunted wall&#034; never really existed, at least not as a stable structure, did it?  Content has always been in great degree dictated by business considerations in the corpress, hasn&#039;t it?</p>
<p>Of course, it didn&#039;t use to be that the front section of a paper looked more like an advertising supplement.</p>
<p>It&#039;s like the old joke &#8230;</p>
<p>&#034;The food&#039;s terrible &#8230; and such small portions.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Frontiers in Journalism - Fox News Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/12/03/new-frontiers-in-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-10692</link>
		<dc:creator>New Frontiers in Journalism - Fox News Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13406#comment-10692</guid>
		<description>[...] New Frontiers in Journalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Frontiers in Journalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

