LAT: 'Risky' Tax Hikes on Wealthy
11/20/2009 by Peter HartA headline in today's Los Angeles Times (11/20/09): "Democrats Risk Taxing the Wealthy for Healthcare."
The paper explains:
Embracing the progressive--and sometimes politically risky--principle that the cost of carrying out public policies should fall to the well-off more than the disadvantaged, both the House and Senate bills would place new taxes on the wealthy to help pay for expanded insurance coverage.
Since mostly people aren't "well-off," and raising taxes on the wealthy tends to be rather popular with most people, what exactly is the political risk here? Surely the article will tell us. Oh, here it is:
In a recent Associated Press poll, 57 percent of those surveyed favored taxing people who earn more than $250,000 a year to pay for the healthcare overhaul. Of a variety of financing options tested in the survey, that tax was the only idea supported by a majority.
In other words, the not-very-risky idea of raising taxes on the wealthy.
Tags: L.A. Times
Diggit
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo
Facebook
StumbleUpon
November 21st, 2009 at 11:41 am
Not to worry. The Teabaggers are on the job!
January 20th, 2010 at 1:27 pm
[...] the record, taxing the rich is not an idea that has "a chance of winning broad public support"--it already has broad public [...]
January 20th, 2010 at 3:02 pm
[...] the rich is not an idea that has "a chance of winning broad public support"–it already has broad public [...]
March 1st, 2010 at 4:03 pm
[...] higher, and that political outcomes would be very different. The public consistently favors higher taxes for the wealthy, for example–but don't hold your breath waiting for pundits to take up that [...]