<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill O&#039;Reilly and Cuban-Style Tax Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: November 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-39332</link>
		<dc:creator>November 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13282#comment-39332</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/ . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/</a> . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-10281</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13282#comment-10281</guid>
		<description>Funny, the Reagan &quot;tax cut&quot; got rid of all interest deductions except mortgage.  Think about it.  Before this &quot;cut.&quot; your Master Card, Visa, Sears, etc interest payments were deductable.  Then they weren&#039;t.  For the middle class tax payer, the interest deduction was (and is) almost always the largest.  So what was the result of the tax cut for the middle class,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the Reagan &#034;tax cut&#034; got rid of all interest deductions except mortgage.  Think about it.  Before this &#034;cut.&#034; your Master Card, Visa, Sears, etc interest payments were deductable.  Then they weren&#039;t.  For the middle class tax payer, the interest deduction was (and is) almost always the largest.  So what was the result of the tax cut for the middle class,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sortition</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-10275</link>
		<dc:creator>Sortition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13282#comment-10275</guid>
		<description>By the way, to whatever extent Reagan &quot;traded deductions for lower rates&quot;, it was a very lucrative trade for the rich. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/98xx/doc9884/12-23-EffectiveTaxRates_Letter.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In 1980, the top 0.01% of household paid 39.1% of their income in federal taxes. By the 1988 they were paying 32.2%.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, to whatever extent Reagan &#034;traded deductions for lower rates&#034;, it was a very lucrative trade for the rich. <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/98xx/doc9884/12-23-EffectiveTaxRates_Letter.pdf" rel="nofollow">In 1980, the top 0.01% of household paid 39.1% of their income in federal taxes. By the 1988 they were paying 32.2%.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sortition</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/11/06/bill-oreilly-and-cuban-style-tax-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-10274</link>
		<dc:creator>Sortition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13282#comment-10274</guid>
		<description>Randy,

There are lots of deductions now as well, but that is beside the point. O&#039;Reilly and his likes make the flat assertion that a high top income tax rate is un-American, deductions or not. This is simply historically wrong, as FAIR points out.

By the way, if you want to make an argument about the history of deductions, please do - with the appropriate facts and sources, of course - I am interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy,</p>
<p>There are lots of deductions now as well, but that is beside the point. O&#039;Reilly and his likes make the flat assertion that a high top income tax rate is un-American, deductions or not. This is simply historically wrong, as FAIR points out.</p>
<p>By the way, if you want to make an argument about the history of deductions, please do &#8211; with the appropriate facts and sources, of course &#8211; I am interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

