<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WP Opinion Pages Think Someone Else Should Have a Debate on Single-Payer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-single-payer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-single-payer/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: October 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-single-payer/comment-page-1/#comment-39456</link>
		<dc:creator>October 2009 &#171; Questionable Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13205#comment-39456</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-sing... . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-sing.." rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-sing..</a>. . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaPo Editor Wants a War Debate&#8211;Somewhere Else - Fox News Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-single-payer/comment-page-1/#comment-21680</link>
		<dc:creator>WaPo Editor Wants a War Debate&#8211;Somewhere Else - Fox News Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13205#comment-21680</guid>
		<description>[...] outcome, but we should get there after an honest debate, not through the back door.&#8221; As we pointed out then, the Post had done next to nothing to provide an &#8220;honest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] outcome, but we should get there after an honest debate, not through the back door.&#034; As we pointed out then, the Post had done next to nothing to provide an &#034;honest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WaPo Editor Wants a War Debate--Somewhere Else</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-single-payer/comment-page-1/#comment-21668</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WaPo Editor Wants a War Debate--Somewhere Else</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13205#comment-21668</guid>
		<description>[...] the best outcome, but we should get there after an honest debate, not through the back door.&quot; As we pointed out then, the Post had done next to nothing to provide an &quot;honest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the best outcome, but we should get there after an honest debate, not through the back door.&quot; As we pointed out then, the Post had done next to nothing to provide an &quot;honest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Galvin</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/wp-opinion-pages-think-someone-else-should-have-a-debate-on-single-payer/comment-page-1/#comment-10152</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Galvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13205#comment-10152</guid>
		<description>Coverage, coverage, coverage. 
We don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; coverage! 
We need care. 
Coverage is NOT care. 
Single-payer is the ONLY solution. 
Everything else is just putting lipstick on a pig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coverage, coverage, coverage.<br />
We don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; coverage!<br />
We need care.<br />
Coverage is NOT care.<br />
Single-payer is the ONLY solution.<br />
Everything else is just putting lipstick on a pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

