<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The WP&#039;s Public Option Polling, Continued&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/the-wps-public-option-polling-continued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/the-wps-public-option-polling-continued/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Goodspeed</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/the-wps-public-option-polling-continued/comment-page-1/#comment-10125</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Goodspeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13202#comment-10125</guid>
		<description>I have had yet to read a poll, other than those produced by the far-right for their own purposes, that hasn&#039;t shown the &quot;Public Option&quot; to have overwhelming support among the public (as high as 73% to as low at 57%) since debate on the subject became noteworthy.  The Medical Community has shown similar support according to their largest recognized organization, the American Medical Association.

Any reputable source that implies that the majority of the public&#039;s support has been anything other than constant has to be self-serving at best.  I&#039;ll leave what may constitute &quot;at worst&quot; to your imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had yet to read a poll, other than those produced by the far-right for their own purposes, that hasn&#039;t shown the &#034;Public Option&#034; to have overwhelming support among the public (as high as 73% to as low at 57%) since debate on the subject became noteworthy.  The Medical Community has shown similar support according to their largest recognized organization, the American Medical Association.</p>
<p>Any reputable source that implies that the majority of the public&#039;s support has been anything other than constant has to be self-serving at best.  I&#039;ll leave what may constitute &#034;at worst&#034; to your imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightgaunt</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/the-wps-public-option-polling-continued/comment-page-1/#comment-10117</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightgaunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13202#comment-10117</guid>
		<description>Public option now has been reduced to barely tolerable status and Obama doesn&#039;t care one way or the other. It could barely help 3% and that is a crime. We want single payer not this with the Gingrich medical plan. Where the insurance is forced on us. If you can&#039;t pay you are in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public option now has been reduced to barely tolerable status and Obama doesn&#039;t care one way or the other. It could barely help 3% and that is a crime. We want single payer not this with the Gingrich medical plan. Where the insurance is forced on us. If you can&#039;t pay you are in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Couvares</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/26/the-wps-public-option-polling-continued/comment-page-1/#comment-10097</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Couvares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13202#comment-10097</guid>
		<description>The WP and other mainstream journalists are pushing the &quot;surprise comeback&quot; line to counteract their own &quot;populist uprising&quot; line. By trumping up the phony &quot;grassroots&quot; movement against the public option this summer, they made the evidence for continuing support for it incomprehensible. So - voila! - an explanation arrives -- the turnaround. Has they covered Congressional townhalls where constituents praised the reform plans, or spoke thoughtfully about health care options; had they asked fewer questions in surveys about &quot;death panels&quot; and more about what people want from a reformed health care system; they might have found more or less consistent support for the general outlines of the plan being brought forward right now -- indeed, for an even ampler version pf public option. But they didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WP and other mainstream journalists are pushing the &#034;surprise comeback&#034; line to counteract their own &#034;populist uprising&#034; line. By trumping up the phony &#034;grassroots&#034; movement against the public option this summer, they made the evidence for continuing support for it incomprehensible. So &#8211; voila! &#8211; an explanation arrives &#8212; the turnaround. Has they covered Congressional townhalls where constituents praised the reform plans, or spoke thoughtfully about health care options; had they asked fewer questions in surveys about &#034;death panels&#034; and more about what people want from a reformed health care system; they might have found more or less consistent support for the general outlines of the plan being brought forward right now &#8212; indeed, for an even ampler version pf public option. But they didn&#039;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

