Comments on: Fox's Flawed Football Analogy

By: Rod Hardesty

Rod Hardesty — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:11:45 +0000

Say what you will about Beck and Hannity, but when I see the video clips and hear with my own ears what many of the Obama administration have said on many topics that I consider guaranteed to the citizens of this country, then it does not matter if it is "news" or "commentary". I am smart enough to know what is someones opinion and what is fact. If you can't, that is your problem. At this point in time I think people are still free to chose what they watch and listen to. FOX has the most viewers in the time slots from 4:00 PM to 10:00 PM, so deal with it. Rush has more listeners than any five liberals together. O'Reilly, Beck and Hannity radio shows are successful because people CHOSE to listen. Duh, what does that tell you, GENIUS?

By: nintendo ds r4 card

nintendo ds r4 card — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:18:23 +0000

I agree with the above, however I have to draw the line at comparing them to Fox. CNN's flaws are largely of neglect and incompetence. Fox's flaws are by design.

By: Max

Max — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:17:33 +0000

Fucks News. Fair & balanced.

By: Michael Enders

Michael Enders — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:50:16 +0000

If the White House had criticized the opinions expressed by Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, or any one else as being unfair, it would be within its right to do so, but saying that Fox News is not really a news organization is way off base. They have real reporters covering real news stories and in some cases risking their lives to do so. Every news network has commentary. All commentary is biased; that is the nature of commentary. All news organizations have shows that involve commentary, and only one is accused of not being a news organization. If this was an attempt to punish Fox News, it has had the opposite effect; Fox News ratings have gone even higher. The White House has really stepped in it this time and it is going to take a long time to clean the stinky stuff off its shoes.