<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatives &#039;Work the Refs,&#039; Chapter Eleventy Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/21/conservatives-work-the-refs-chapter-eleventy-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/21/conservatives-work-the-refs-chapter-eleventy-billion/</link>
	<description>The national media watch group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Freedem</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/21/conservatives-work-the-refs-chapter-eleventy-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13150#comment-9925</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;BUCHANAN: I know when we hit the New York Times, for example, in the &#039;60s, all of a sudden, they blossomed with an op-ed page that had some conservatives on it and conservative voices there, and all the other newspapers did, as well.&quot;&quot;&quot;

I wonder how that differs from the Obama Whitehouse &quot;hitting&quot; the Fux Gnus channel? Or in what way various &quot;actual&quot; news organizations handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;&#034;"BUCHANAN: I know when we hit the New York Times, for example, in the &#039;60s, all of a sudden, they blossomed with an op-ed page that had some conservatives on it and conservative voices there, and all the other newspapers did, as well.&#034;"&#034;</p>
<p>I wonder how that differs from the Obama Whitehouse &#034;hitting&#034; the Fux Gnus channel? Or in what way various &#034;actual&#034; news organizations handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi Dragert</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/21/conservatives-work-the-refs-chapter-eleventy-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-9907</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobi Dragert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13150#comment-9907</guid>
		<description>The MSM never has been liberal - it&#039;s a fallacy invented and perpetrated by right-wingers.  To the right wing, liberal media is that which reports the whole truth, despite how it makes some politicians look.  And &quot;fair and balanced&quot; to them means putting forth opposing views to absolutely everything Democrats suggest, most often even if there is no valid &quot;opposing view&quot; -- the more outrageous the &quot;opposing view&quot; they put out, and the louder the big mouth stating it, the higher their TV ratings go.  It&#039;s all entertainment to too many viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSM never has been liberal &#8211; it&#039;s a fallacy invented and perpetrated by right-wingers.  To the right wing, liberal media is that which reports the whole truth, despite how it makes some politicians look.  And &#034;fair and balanced&#034; to them means putting forth opposing views to absolutely everything Democrats suggest, most often even if there is no valid &#034;opposing view&#034; &#8212; the more outrageous the &#034;opposing view&#034; they put out, and the louder the big mouth stating it, the higher their TV ratings go.  It&#039;s all entertainment to too many viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitchell kaidy</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/21/conservatives-work-the-refs-chapter-eleventy-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-9899</link>
		<dc:creator>mitchell kaidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13150#comment-9899</guid>
		<description>During the Nixon Administration days, Bill Safire and Pat Buchanan conducted a campaign of sustained denunciation that had little in common with the Obama critique of the far-right Fox News. Fox has been Far Right, anti-Democratic Party long before Obama was elected.
Some form of the Fairness Doctrine should be revived that, like the original doctrine, authorizes the station licensee to determine if &quot;all sides are heard on a controversial issue of public importance.&quot;--mk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Nixon Administration days, Bill Safire and Pat Buchanan conducted a campaign of sustained denunciation that had little in common with the Obama critique of the far-right Fox News. Fox has been Far Right, anti-Democratic Party long before Obama was elected.<br />
Some form of the Fairness Doctrine should be revived that, like the original doctrine, authorizes the station licensee to determine if &#034;all sides are heard on a controversial issue of public importance.&#034;--mk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick D. Prein</title>
		<link>http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/10/21/conservatives-work-the-refs-chapter-eleventy-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-9852</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick D. Prein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13150#comment-9852</guid>
		<description>During the Bush administration there was a conservative media bias, and few democrats were allowed interviews with the administration.Helen Thomas comes to mind.Is Fox Network a reputable News network or just an arm of the Republikan propaganda apparatus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Bush administration there was a conservative media bias, and few democrats were allowed interviews with the administration.Helen Thomas comes to mind.Is Fox Network a reputable News network or just an arm of the Republikan propaganda apparatus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

